• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性出血控制期间与大量输血相关的休克指数与血液消耗评分评估的比较。

Comparison of Shock Index With the Assessment of Blood Consumption Score for Association With Massive Transfusion During Hemorrhage Control for Trauma.

机构信息

The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii (Mss Day and Ng, Mr Severino, and Dr Hayashi); and University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Honolulu (Dr Huang).

出版信息

J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(6):341-349. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000613.

DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000613
PMID:34766927
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of early mortality following trauma. A massive transfusion protocol (MTP) to guide resuscitation while bleeding is definitively controlled may improve outcomes. Prompts to initiate massive transfusion (MT) include shock index (SI) and the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score.

OBJECTIVE

To compare SI with the ABC score for association with transfusion requirement, need for emergency hemorrhage interventions, and early mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of trauma MTP activations at our Level I trauma center was conducted from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. The study data were obtained from the Trauma Registry and the blood bank. An SI cutoff of 1.0 was chosen for comparison with the positive ABC score.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 146 patients. Shock index ≥ 1 had significant association with MT requirement (p = .002) whereas a positive ABC score did not (p = .65). More patients with SI ≥ 1 required bleeding control interventions (67% surgery, 47% interventional radiology) than patients having a positive ABC score (49% surgery, 29% interventional radiology). For geriatric patients who received MT, 65% had SI ≥ 1 but only 30% had a positive ABC score. Three-hour mortality following emergency department arrival was similar (60% SI ≥ 1, 62% positive ABC score).

CONCLUSION

Shock index ≥ 1 outperformed a positive ABC score for association with MT requirement. Shock index is a simple tool registered nurses can independently utilize to anticipate MT.

摘要

背景

出血是创伤后早期死亡的主要原因。在明确控制出血的同时,采用大量输血方案(MTP)指导复苏可能会改善预后。启动大量输血(MT)的提示包括休克指数(SI)和评估血液消耗(ABC)评分。

目的

比较 SI 与 ABC 评分与输血需求、紧急出血干预的需求以及早期死亡率的关系。

方法

对 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间在我们的一级创伤中心激活的创伤 MTP 进行回顾性队列分析。研究数据来自创伤登记处和血库。选择 SI 截断值为 1.0 与阳性 ABC 评分进行比较。

结果

研究队列包括 146 名患者。SI≥1 与 MT 需求有显著关联(p=0.002),而阳性 ABC 评分则没有(p=0.65)。更多 SI≥1 的患者需要出血控制干预(67%手术,47%介入放射学),而阳性 ABC 评分的患者则为 49%手术,29%介入放射学。对于接受 MT 的老年患者,65%有 SI≥1,但只有 30%有阳性 ABC 评分。急诊科到达后 3 小时死亡率相似(60%SI≥1,62%阳性 ABC 评分)。

结论

SI≥1 与 MT 需求的相关性优于阳性 ABC 评分。SI 是注册护士可以独立使用的简单工具,可以预测 MT。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Shock Index With the Assessment of Blood Consumption Score for Association With Massive Transfusion During Hemorrhage Control for Trauma.创伤性出血控制期间与大量输血相关的休克指数与血液消耗评分评估的比较。
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(6):341-349. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000613.
2
Accuracy of shock index versus ABC score to predict need for massive transfusion in trauma patients.休克指数与ABC评分预测创伤患者大量输血需求的准确性。
Injury. 2018 Jan;49(1):15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Prediction of massive transfusion with the Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) score at Canadian level I trauma centers.在加拿大一级创伤中心采用修订版出血与输血评估(RABT)评分预测大量输血情况。
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.022. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
4
Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Trauma Patients with Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, and Age Shock Index.使用休克指数、改良休克指数和年龄休克指数预测创伤性休克患者的大量输血情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jul 5;13(7):683. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13070683.
5
Comparison of massive and emergency transfusion prediction scoring systems after trauma with a new Bleeding Risk Index score applied in-flight.创伤后大量和紧急输血预测评分系统的比较,应用了一种新的 Bleeding Risk Index 评分,在飞行中进行。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Feb 1;90(2):268-273. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003031.
6
The Extremity/Mechanism/Shock Index/GCS (EMS-G) score: A novel pre-hospital scoring system for early and appropriate MTP activation.创伤/机制/冲击指数/格拉斯哥昏迷评分(EMS-G):一种新型的院前评分系统,用于早期和适当的 MTP 激活。
Am J Surg. 2019 Dec;218(6):1195-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.08.019. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
7
Massive Transfusion: The Revised Assessment of Bleeding and Transfusion (RABT) Score.大量输血:出血与输血的修订评估(RABT)评分
World J Surg. 2018 Nov;42(11):3560-3567. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4674-y.
8
Emergency red cells first: Rapid response or speed bump? The evolution of a massive transfusion protocol for trauma in a single UK centre.先输注紧急红细胞:快速反应还是障碍?英国单个中心创伤大量输血方案的演变
Injury. 2015 Sep;46(9):1772-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.046. Epub 2015 May 31.
9
Early identification of bleeding in trauma patients: external validation of traumatic bleeding scores in the Swiss Trauma Registry.创伤患者出血的早期识别:瑞士创伤登记处创伤性出血评分的外部验证。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 28;26(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04178-8.
10
Use of Plasma-Based Trauma Transfusion Protocols at Level IV Trauma Centers.四级创伤中心基于血浆的创伤输血方案的应用。
J Trauma Nurs. 2018 Jul/Aug;25(4):213-217. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000375.