• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国外科医师学会虚拟验证审查委员会访视:医疗体系观点

Navigating an American College of Surgeons Virtual Verification Review Committee Visit: A Health System Perspective.

机构信息

Northwell Health Trauma Institute, Department of Surgery, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.

出版信息

J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(6):395-400. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000619.

DOI:10.1097/JTN.0000000000000619
PMID:34766934
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faced with a global pandemic at the beginning of 2020, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT) canceled in-person site visits. Late in 2020, the focus shifted to recovery and returning to a "new normal," and the ACS transitioned to virtual visits.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides insight from a health system perspective on how we developed a virtual platform, prepared our system and staff, organized our teams, and lessons learned during virtual ACS visits.

METHODS

The Northwell Health Trauma Institute, a member of the largest health system in New York State, oversees seven centers ranging from Level I to Level III, including two pediatric centers. Preparations for virtual visits began with standardizing processes to ensure a smooth transition for our centers. We utilized the ACS virtual agenda as a framework. The methods we used will be divided into categories, including technology, personnel, and preparations.

RESULTS

Having multiple sites engage in the virtual visit enabled us to gain insight as we completed each visit. We standardized processes and created a team site for uploading documents. As a result, we established best practices.

CONCLUSION

Shifting focus from an in-person visit to a virtual visit provided us with an opportunity to assess our preparations and to determine the most effective and efficient ways to navigate this new process. Having multiple sites allowed us to critique our process and make changes as we proceeded with subsequent sites.

摘要

背景

2020 年初,面对全球大流行,美国外科医师学会创伤委员会 (ACS-COT) 取消了现场考察。2020 年末,重点转向复苏和回归“新常态”,ACS 转向虚拟访问。

目的

本文从医疗系统的角度提供了一些见解,介绍了我们如何开发虚拟平台、准备我们的系统和人员、组织我们的团队,以及在虚拟 ACS 访问中获得的经验教训。

方法

Northwell Health 创伤研究所是纽约州最大的医疗系统的成员,负责监督从一级到三级的七个中心,包括两个儿科中心。虚拟访问的准备工作从标准化流程开始,以确保我们的中心顺利过渡。我们利用 ACS 虚拟议程作为框架。我们使用的方法将分为技术、人员和准备三个类别。

结果

多个站点参与虚拟访问使我们能够在完成每次访问时获得深入了解。我们标准化了流程并创建了一个团队站点来上传文件。因此,我们建立了最佳实践。

结论

从现场访问转移到虚拟访问为我们提供了评估准备情况的机会,并确定了导航这一新过程的最有效和最有效的方法。多个站点允许我们在处理后续站点时对我们的流程进行批评,并进行更改。

相似文献

1
Navigating an American College of Surgeons Virtual Verification Review Committee Visit: A Health System Perspective.美国外科医师学会虚拟验证审查委员会访视:医疗体系观点
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(6):395-400. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000619.
2
Preparing for an American College of Surgeons Virtual Trauma Reverification Site Visit: One Center's Experience.美国外科医师学会虚拟创伤再认证现场考察准备:一家中心的经验。
J Trauma Nurs. 2021;28(3):203-208. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000584.
3
Preparation and achievement of American College of Surgeons level I trauma verification raises hospital performance and improves patient outcome.美国外科医师学会一级创伤认证的准备与达成提升了医院绩效并改善了患者预后。
J Trauma. 2001 Aug;51(2):294-9; discussion 299-300. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200108000-00011.
4
Characteristics of ACS-verified Level I and Level II trauma centers: A study linking trauma center verification review data and the National Trauma Data Bank of the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma.经美国外科医师学会创伤委员会认证的一级和二级创伤中心的特征:一项将创伤中心认证审查数据与美国外科医师学会创伤委员会国家创伤数据库相联系的研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Oct;81(4):735-42. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001136.
5
American College of Surgeons trauma center verification versus state designation: are Level II centers slipping through the cracks?美国外科医师学会创伤中心验证与州指定:二级中心是否被忽视了?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):44-9; discussion 49. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182988729.
6
Noncompliance with American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma recommended criteria for full trauma team activation is associated with undertriage deaths.不符合美国外科医师学会创伤委员会推荐的充分创伤小组激活标准与分诊不足死亡有关。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Feb;84(2):287-294. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001745.
7
Decreased Pediatric Trauma Length of Stay and Improved Disposition With Implementation of Lewin's Change Model.实施卢因变革模型后小儿创伤住院时间缩短及出院情况改善
J Trauma Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;26(2):84-88. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000426.
8
A paradigm for achieving successful pediatric trauma verification in the absence of pediatric surgical specialists while ensuring quality of care.一种在没有小儿外科专家的情况下实现成功的小儿创伤核查同时确保医疗质量的范例。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Mar;80(3):433-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000945.
9
Trauma system evaluation in developing countries: applicability of American College of Surgeons/Committee on Trauma (ACS/COT) basic criteria.发展中国家的创伤系统评估:美国外科医师学会/创伤委员会(ACS/COT)基本标准的适用性
World J Surg. 2014 Aug;38(8):1898-904. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2538-7.
10
Analysis of American College of Surgeons trauma consultation program.美国外科医师学会创伤会诊项目分析
Arch Surg. 1995 Jun;130(6):578-83; discussion 583-4. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430060016003.