Suppr超能文献

高收入国家中导致死胎的病因的种族差异:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Ethnic variation in causes of stillbirth in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Aug;158(2):270-277. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14023. Epub 2021 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Inequities in stillbirth rate according to ethnicity persist in high-income nations. The objective of the present study is to investigate whether causes of stillbirth differ by ethnicity in high-income nations.

METHODS

The following databases were searched since their inception to 1 February 2021: Medline, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Global Health. Cohort, cross-sectional, and retrospective studies were included. Causes of stillbirth were aligned to the International Classification of Disease 10 for Perinatal Mortality (ICD10-PM) and pooled estimates were derived by meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifteen reports from three countries (72 555 stillbirths) were included. Seven ethnic groups - "Caucasian" (n = 11 studies), "African" (n = 11 studies), "Hispanic" (n = 7 studies), "Indigenous Australian" (n = 4 studies), "Asian" (n = 2 studies), "South Asian" (n = 2 studies), and "American Indian" (n = 1 study) - were identified. There was an overall paucity of recent, high-quality data for many ethnicities. For those with the greatest amount of data - Caucasian, African, and Hispanic - no major differences in the causes of stillbirth were identified.

CONCLUSION

There is a paucity of high-quality information on causes of stillbirth for many ethnicities. Improving investigation and standardizing classification of stillbirths is needed to assess whether causes of stillbirth differ across more diverse ethnic groups.

摘要

目的

高收入国家的死产率仍存在种族差异。本研究旨在调查高收入国家的死产原因是否因种族而异。

方法

自成立以来,我们检索了以下数据库,直到 2021 年 2 月 1 日:Medline、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL、Cochrane 图书馆和全球健康。纳入了队列、横断面和回顾性研究。将死产的原因与国际疾病分类第 10 版围产期死亡率(ICD10-PM)进行了对齐,并通过荟萃分析得出了汇总估计值。

结果

纳入了来自三个国家的 15 份报告(72 555 例死产)。确定了七个种族群体——“高加索人”(n=11 项研究)、“非洲人”(n=11 项研究)、“西班牙裔”(n=7 项研究)、“澳大利亚原住民”(n=4 项研究)、“亚洲人”(n=2 项研究)、“南亚人”(n=2 项研究)和“美洲印第安人”(n=1 项研究)。对于许多种族来说,目前缺乏高质量的最新数据。对于那些数据最多的种族——高加索人、非洲人和西班牙裔人——没有发现死产原因的重大差异。

结论

对于许多种族来说,关于死产原因的高质量信息很少。需要改进调查并规范死产分类,以评估不同族裔群体之间的死产原因是否存在差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验