Shiha Gamal, Soliman Reham, Mikhail Nabiel N H, Alswat Khalid, Abdo Ayman, Sanai Faisal, Derbala Moutaz F, Örmeci Necati, Dalekos George N, Al-Busafi Said, Hamoudi Waseem, Sharara Ala I, Zaky Samy, El-Raey Fathiya, Mabrouk Mai, Marzouk Samir, Toyoda Hidenori
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Egyptian Liver Research Institute and Hospital (ELRIAH), Sherbin, Egypt.
Hepatology and Gastroenterology Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Hepatol Res. 2022 Feb;52(2):165-175. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13729. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Non-invasive tests (NITs), such as Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), developed using classical statistical methods, are increasingly used for determining liver fibrosis stages and recommended in treatment guidelines replacing the liver biopsy. Application of conventional cutoffs of FIB-4 and APRI resulted in high rates of misclassification of fibrosis stages.
There is an unmet need for more accurate NITs that can overcome the limitations of FIB-4 and APRI.
Machine learning with the random forest algorithm was used to develop a non-invasive index using retrospective data of 7238 patients with biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis C from two centers in Egypt; derivation dataset (n = 1821) and validation set in the second center (n = 5417). Receiver operator curve analysis was used to define cutoffs for different stages of fibrosis. Performance of the new score was externally validated in cohorts from two other sites in Egypt (n = 560) and seven different countries (n = 1317). Fibrosis stages were determined using the METAVIR score. Results were also compared with three established tools (FIB-4, APRI, and the aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio [AAR]).
Age in addition to readily available laboratory parameters such as aspartate, and alanine aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, albumin (g/dl), and platelet count (/cm ) correlated with the biopsy-derived stage of liver fibrosis in the derivation cohort and were used to construct the model for predicting the fibrosis stage by applying the random forest algorithm, resulting in an FIB-6 index, which can be calculated easily at http://fib6.elriah.info. Application of the cutoff values derived from the derivation group on the validation groups yielded very good performance in ruling out cirrhosis (negative predictive value [NPV] = 97.7%), compensated advance liver disease (NPV = 90.2%), and significant fibrosis (NPV = 65.7%). In the external validation groups from different countries, FIB-6 demonstrated higher sensitivity and NPV than FIB-4, APRI, and AAR.
FIB-6 score is a non-invasive, simple, and accurate test for ruling out liver cirrhosis and compensated advance liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis C and performs better than APRI, FIB-4, and AAR.
使用经典统计方法开发的无创检测(NITs),如纤维化-4指数(FIB-4)和天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数(APRI),越来越多地用于确定肝纤维化阶段,并在治疗指南中被推荐用于取代肝活检。应用FIB-4和APRI的传统临界值导致纤维化阶段的错误分类率很高。
迫切需要更准确的无创检测方法来克服FIB-4和APRI的局限性。
使用随机森林算法的机器学习方法,利用来自埃及两个中心的7238例经活检证实为慢性丙型肝炎患者的回顾性数据开发一种无创指数;推导数据集(n = 1821)和第二个中心的验证集(n = 5417)。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析来确定不同纤维化阶段的临界值。新评分的性能在来自埃及其他两个地点(n = 560)和七个不同国家(n = 1317)的队列中进行了外部验证。使用METAVIR评分确定纤维化阶段。结果还与三种既定工具(FIB-4、APRI和天冬氨酸转氨酶与丙氨酸转氨酶比值[AAR])进行了比较。
除了天冬氨酸、丙氨酸转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、白蛋白(g/dl)和血小板计数(/cm)等易于获得的实验室参数外,年龄与推导队列中经活检得出的肝纤维化阶段相关,并用于通过应用随机森林算法构建预测纤维化阶段的模型,从而得出FIB-6指数,该指数可在http://fib6.elriah.info上轻松计算。将推导组得出的临界值应用于验证组,在排除肝硬化(阴性预测值[NPV]=97.7%)、代偿期晚期肝病(NPV=90.2%)和显著纤维化(NPV=65.7%)方面表现出非常好的性能。在来自不同国家的外部验证组中,FIB-6显示出比FIB-4、APRI和AAR更高的敏感性和NPV。`
FIB-6评分是一种用于排除慢性丙型肝炎患者肝硬化和代偿期晚期肝病的无创、简单且准确的检测方法,其性能优于APRI、FIB-4和AAR。