• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection Is Associated with High Rate of Failure to Reimplant and Mortality.用于治疗假体周围肩关节感染的两阶段翻修关节成形术与再植入失败率和死亡率较高相关。
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 6;10(21):5186. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215186.
2
Current actual success rate of the two-stage exchange arthroplasty strategy in chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection.两阶段髋关节和膝关节置换术后假体周围感染翻修策略的当前实际成功率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Dec;102-B(12):1682-1688. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B12.BJJ-2020-0792.R1.
3
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Rate and Reason for the Attrition After the First Stage.两阶段关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染:一期手术后的磨损率及原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2749-2756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
4
The Fate of Spacers in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. spacer 在位情况在假体周围关节感染治疗中的作用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Sep 16;97(18):1495-502. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00958.
5
Staged Revision With Antibiotic Spacers for Shoulder Prosthetic Joint Infections Yields High Infection Control.使用抗生素间隔物分期翻修治疗肩关节人工关节感染可有效控制感染。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):146-152. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000049.
6
Clinical Outcome of Two-Stage Revision after Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection.人工肩关节周围感染后两阶段翻修的临床结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 9;10(2):218. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020218.
7
Two-stage reimplantation for deep infection after total elbow arthroplasty.全肘关节置换术后深部感染的两阶段再植入术
Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Dec;14(6):668-676. doi: 10.1177/17585732211043524. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
Time to Reimplantation: Waiting Longer Confers No Added Benefit.再植时间:等待时间延长并无额外获益。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1850-1854. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.073. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
9
Outcomes of revision arthroplasty for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a three-stage revision protocol.肩假体周围关节感染翻修术的结果:三阶段翻修方案。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):268-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.014. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
10
Patients With Failed Prior Two-Stage Exchange Have Poor Outcomes After Further Surgical Intervention.先前两阶段翻修失败的患者在进一步手术干预后预后较差。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1262-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes of Two-Stage Revision Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Shoulder.肩关节假体周围感染两阶段翻修关节成形术的中长期疗效
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 16;14(2):547. doi: 10.3390/jcm14020547.
2
Mid- to long-term outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty as revision procedure for failed hemiarthroplasty after proximal humerus fracture.肱骨近端骨折后肱骨头置换失败行反式全肩关节置换术的中期至长期疗效。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 20;25(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07870-8.
3
One- vs. Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.人工关节周围肩部感染的一期与二期翻修术:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 May 14;13(5):440. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13050440.
4
Innovations in the Realm of Shoulder Arthroplasty.肩关节置换领域的创新
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 28;12(1):237. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010237.
5
Changes in microbiological spectrum and antibiotic susceptibility in two-stage exchange for periprosthetic shoulder infections.二期清创旷置治疗人工肩假体周围感染的微生物谱和抗生素敏感性变化。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jul;143(7):3871-3878. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04635-7. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of serum C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection.血清 C-反应蛋白在人工肩袖感染诊断中的作用。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):1715-1721. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03779-2. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
Clinical Outcome of Two-Stage Revision after Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection.人工肩关节周围感染后两阶段翻修的临床结果
J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 9;10(2):218. doi: 10.3390/jcm10020218.
3
The management of infected shoulder arthroplasty by two-stage revision.两阶段翻修术治疗感染性肩关节置换术
Shoulder Elbow. 2020 Dec;12(1 Suppl):70-80. doi: 10.1177/1758573219841057. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
4
Single-stage versus two-stage revision for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一期与两期翻修治疗肩假体周围关节感染的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Dec;29(12):2476-2486. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.034. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
5
Antibiotic cement spacer retention for chronic shoulder infection after minimum 2-year follow-up.抗生素骨水泥间隔器保留用于慢性肩部感染,随访至少 2 年。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Sep;29(9):e325-e329. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.065. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
6
The role of implant sonication in the diagnosis of periprosthetic shoulder infection.植入物超声冲洗在人工关节周围感染诊断中的作用。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):e222-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.011. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With High Attrition Rate and Mortality.初次全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染行二期翻修术与高损耗率和高死亡率相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1384-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.005. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Diagnosis and Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Shoulder Arthroplasty.肩关节置换术后假体周围关节感染的诊断与处理
JBJS Rev. 2019 Jul;7(7):e3. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00152.
9
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Rate and Reason for the Attrition After the First Stage.两阶段关节置换术治疗人工关节周围感染:一期手术后的磨损率及原因。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Nov;34(11):2749-2756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
10
Management of infected shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of treatment strategies.感染性肩关节置换术后的处理:治疗策略比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):1658-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Jun 14.

用于治疗假体周围肩关节感染的两阶段翻修关节成形术与再植入失败率和死亡率较高相关。

Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Shoulder Infection Is Associated with High Rate of Failure to Reimplant and Mortality.

作者信息

Akgün Doruk, Wiethölter Mats, Maziak Nina, Paksoy Alp, Karczewski Daniel, Scheibel Markus, Moroder Philipp

机构信息

Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlind, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 6;10(21):5186. doi: 10.3390/jcm10215186.

DOI:10.3390/jcm10215186
PMID:34768706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8584704/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the shoulder, who fail to undergo reimplantation in an attempted two-stage exchange seem to be neglected in the current literature. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical course of patients after the first stage in the process of an attempted two-stage exchange for shoulder PJI.

METHODS

After a retrospective review of our institutional database between 2008 and 2018, 49 patients, who were treated with an intended two-stage exchange for shoulder PJI, were identified. Patients' demographics, laboratory and health status parameters, along with records of clinical outcome were collected. The primary outcome measurements analyzed were infection eradication, successful reimplantation, and patient survival.

RESULTS

Reimplantation was completed in only 35 (71%) of 49 cases and eradication of infection was achieved in 85.7% of patients with successful reimplantation after a mean follow-up duration of 5.1 years (1.1 to 10.2 years). Reasons for failure to reimplant were premature death in 36%, high general morbidity in 29%, satisfaction with the current status in 21%, or severe infection with poor bone and soft tissues in 14% of the patients. Of the 14 cases without reimplantation, eradication rate of infection was 57% after a mean follow-up of 5 years (2.6 to 11 years). The overall mortality rate of the entire cohort was 25% at the latest follow-up and 10% within ninety days after implant removal. Patients who deceased or did not undergo reimplantation during the follow-up were significantly older and had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).

CONCLUSIONS

While the two-stage exchange arthroplasty can lead to high rates of infection eradication, a considerable subset of patients never undergoes the second stage for a variety of reasons. Shoulder PJI and its treatment are associated with a high risk of mortality, especially in patients with older age and higher CCI.

摘要

背景

对于肩部假体周围关节感染(PJI)患者,在尝试进行两阶段置换时未能进行再植入的情况,在当前文献中似乎被忽视了。本研究的目的是评估在尝试对肩部PJI进行两阶段置换过程中第一阶段后患者的临床病程。

方法

在对我们机构2008年至2018年的数据库进行回顾性分析后,确定了49例接受肩部PJI两阶段置换治疗的患者。收集了患者的人口统计学、实验室和健康状况参数以及临床结果记录。分析的主要结局指标为感染根除、成功再植入和患者存活情况。

结果

49例患者中仅35例(71%)完成了再植入,平均随访5.1年(1.1至10.2年)后,成功再植入的患者中有85.7%实现了感染根除。未进行再植入的原因包括36%的患者过早死亡、29%的患者全身发病率高、21%的患者对现状满意以及14%的患者存在严重感染且骨和软组织状况不佳。在14例未进行再植入的患者中(平均随访5年,2.6至11年),感染根除率为57%。在最新随访时,整个队列的总死亡率为25%,在植入物取出后90天内为10%。在随访期间死亡或未进行再植入的患者年龄显著更大,且Charlson合并症指数(CCI)显著更高。

结论

虽然两阶段置换关节成形术可导致较高的感染根除率,但相当一部分患者由于各种原因从未进行第二阶段手术。肩部PJI及其治疗与高死亡率风险相关,尤其是在年龄较大和CCI较高的患者中。