Tayebwa Edwin, Kalisa Richard, Ndibaza Amedee Fidele, Cornelissen Lisa, Teeselink Eefje Klein, Kim Young-Mi, van Dillen Jeroen, Stekelenburg Jelle
University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Global Health, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
IntraHealth International, Kigali 6639, Rwanda.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11211. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111211.
Most maternal and perinatal deaths could be prevented through timely access to skilled birth attendants. Women should access appropriate obstetric care during pregnancy, labor, and puerperium. Maternity waiting homes (MWHs) permit access to emergency obstetric care when labor starts. This study compared maternal and perinatal outcomes among MWH users and non-users through a retrospective cohort study. Data were collected through obstetric chart reviews and analyzed using STATA version 15. Of the 8144 deliveries reported between 2015 and 2019, 1305 women had high-risk pregnancies and were included in the study. MWH users had more spontaneous vaginal deliveries compared to non-users (38.6% versus 16.8%) and less cesarean sections (57.7% versus 76.7%). Maternal morbidities such as postpartum hemorrhage occurred less frequently among users than non-users (2.13% versus 5.64%). Four women died among non-users while there was no death among users. Non-users had more stillbirths than users (7.68% versus 0.91%). The MWH may have contributed to the observed differences in outcomes. However, many women with high risk pregnancies did not use the MWH, indicating a probable gap in awareness, usefulness, or their inability to stay due to other responsibilities at home. Use of MWHs at scale could improve maternal and perinatal outcomes in Rwanda.
通过及时获得熟练的助产人员,大多数孕产妇和围产期死亡是可以预防的。妇女在孕期、分娩期和产褥期应获得适当的产科护理。产妇候产之家(MWHs)能在分娩开始时提供紧急产科护理。本研究通过回顾性队列研究比较了产妇候产之家使用者和非使用者的孕产妇及围产期结局。数据通过产科病历审查收集,并使用STATA 15版本进行分析。在2015年至2019年报告的8144例分娩中,1305名妇女有高危妊娠并被纳入研究。与非使用者相比,产妇候产之家使用者的自然阴道分娩更多(38.6%对16.8%),剖宫产更少(57.7%对76.7%)。产后出血等孕产妇发病率在使用者中比非使用者更少见(2.13%对5.64%)。非使用者中有4名妇女死亡,而使用者中无死亡病例。非使用者的死产比使用者更多(7.68%对0.91%)。产妇候产之家可能促成了观察到的结局差异。然而,许多有高危妊娠的妇女没有使用产妇候产之家,这表明在认识、效用方面可能存在差距,或者她们由于家中的其他责任而无法入住。大规模使用产妇候产之家可以改善卢旺达的孕产妇和围产期结局。