Health Quality Council of Alberta, Calgary, AB T2N 2A4, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111250.
(1) Background: There are many complexities and trade-offs that design teams consider when designing or renovating a built environment for healthcare. Virtual reality (VR) mock-ups can allow design teams to evaluate the planned design. This study aimed to examine the overall value of using VR mock-ups to conduct a simulation-based mock-up evaluation. (2) Methods: Data collected from scenario enactments within a VR mock-up was compared to data collected from an existing medication room with the same design to assess predictive validity. Outcomes regarding quality and patient safety were also examined as a result of design modifications to the VR mock-up which were identified through a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) of the existing medication room. Survey data from participants, hospital design stakeholders, and POE recommendation recipients captured perceptions regarding the evaluation process. Specifically, this included perceptions regarding mock-up and scenario realism as well as utility of the evaluation process. (3) Results: Evidence-based data collected using the VR mock-up accurately assessed workflow (link analysis), bumps, impediments, interruptions, and task completion times. Collecting data pertaining to selection errors and equipment placement were identified after procuring the VR software and therefore the accuracy of these measures was not assessed. Searching behaviours were not possible to capture using the VR software. A 506% return on investment was achieved through the VR mock-up evaluations. (4) Conclusion: Organizations should consider what evaluation objectives are planned and how they will be measured for a mock-up evaluation to determine if VR is appropriate.
(1) 背景:在为医疗保健设计或翻新建筑环境时,设计团队需要考虑许多复杂性和权衡因素。虚拟现实 (VR) 模型可以让设计团队评估规划设计。本研究旨在探讨使用 VR 模型进行基于模拟的模型评估的整体价值。(2) 方法:将 VR 模型内情景实施过程中收集的数据与具有相同设计的现有药房数据进行比较,以评估预测有效性。还通过对现有药房进行使用后评估 (POE),确定了 VR 模型中的设计修改,从而评估了与质量和患者安全相关的结果。参与者、医院设计利益相关者和 POE 建议接受者的调查数据收集了对评估过程的看法。具体来说,这包括对模型和情景真实性的看法以及评估过程的实用性。(3) 结果:使用 VR 模型收集的循证数据准确评估了工作流程(链接分析)、颠簸、障碍物、中断和任务完成时间。在获得 VR 软件后,确定了与选择错误和设备放置相关的数据,因此这些措施的准确性未得到评估。无法使用 VR 软件捕获搜索行为。通过 VR 模型评估实现了 506%的投资回报率。(4) 结论:组织应考虑计划的评估目标以及如何衡量模拟评估,以确定 VR 是否合适。