Al-Zordk Walid, Saudi Alaa, Abdelkader Abdelraheem, Taher Mansoura, Ghazy Mohamed
Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Horus University, Damietta 34511, Egypt.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;14(21):6476. doi: 10.3390/ma14216476.
This study assesses the effect of the material type (lithium disilicate, zirconia, and polymer-infiltrated ceramic) and dental bonding substrates (dentin, dentin with intra-coronal cavity, and dentin with composite filling) on the fracture resistance and failure mode of molars restored by occlusal veneers.
Ninety occlusal veneers, fabricated from either lithium disilicate, zirconia, or polymer-infiltrated ceramic, were adhesively bonded to teeth prepared with either dentin, dentin with intra-coronal cavity, or dentin with composite filling. All specimens were thermally aged (5000 cycles), then load cycled (120,000 cycles). Each specimen was subjected to a compressive load through fracture, then was examined (×20) to identify the fracture type. Data were statistically analyzed.
Material type and dental substrate had no significant effect on the fracture resistance of adhesively retained occlusal veneer restorations. For each material, no significant differences were found between veneers bonded to dentin, dentin with intra-coronal cavity, and dentin with composite filling. Additionally, within each bonding substrate, there were no significant differences between lithium disilicate, zirconia, and polymer-infiltrated ceramic veneers. The adhesive failure was recorded mainly with zirconia occlusal veneer restorations.
Considering the fracture results, lithium disilicate, zirconia, and polymer-infiltrated ceramic occlusal veneers perform well whatever the type of dental bonding surface. When the dental bonding surface varies, different occlusal veneer materials should be considered. Occlusal veneers bonded to dentin, dentin with composite filling, or dentin with an intra-coronal cavity exhibited a fracture resistance exceeding the average human masticatory forces in the molar area.
本研究评估材料类型(二硅酸锂、氧化锆和聚合物渗透陶瓷)以及牙体粘结基底(牙本质、有冠内洞的牙本质和有复合树脂充填的牙本质)对经咬合面贴面修复的磨牙抗折性及折裂模式的影响。
用二硅酸锂、氧化锆或聚合物渗透陶瓷制作90个咬合面贴面,将其粘结到预备好的牙体上,牙体分别为单纯牙本质、有冠内洞的牙本质或有复合树脂充填的牙本质。所有标本进行热老化(5000次循环),然后进行加载循环(120,000次循环)。每个标本承受压缩载荷直至折断,然后进行检查(×20倍放大)以确定折裂类型。对数据进行统计学分析。
材料类型和牙体基底对粘结固位的咬合面贴面修复体的抗折性无显著影响。对于每种材料,粘结到单纯牙本质、有冠内洞的牙本质和有复合树脂充填的牙本质上的贴面之间未发现显著差异。此外,在每种粘结基底内,二硅酸锂、氧化锆和聚合物渗透陶瓷贴面之间也无显著差异。粘结失败主要记录于氧化锆咬合面贴面修复体。
考虑折裂结果,无论牙体粘结面类型如何,二硅酸锂、氧化锆和聚合物渗透陶瓷咬合面贴面的性能均良好。当牙体粘结面不同时,应考虑不同的咬合面贴面材料。粘结到牙本质、有复合树脂充填的牙本质或有冠内洞的牙本质上的咬合面贴面的抗折性超过磨牙区人类平均咀嚼力。