• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用双重酸蚀表面处理的牙种植体的临床评价:一项长达10年随访的队列观察研究

Clinical Evaluation of Dental Implants with a Double Acid-Etched Surface Treatment: A Cohort Observational Study with Up to 10-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Santos Marino Juan, Cortés-Bretón Brinkmann Jorge, García-Gil Ignacio, Martínez-Rodríguez Natalia, Fraile Javier Flores, Barona Dorado Cristina, Martínez-González José María

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.

Department of dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;14(21):6483. doi: 10.3390/ma14216483.

DOI:10.3390/ma14216483
PMID:34772010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8585230/
Abstract

The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the survival and success rates of dental implants with a double acid-etched surface treatment with evaluation times up to 10 years post-loading. This study was conducted at a hospital oral surgery and implantology unit. It included 111 dental implants with a double acid-etched surface. Three groups were created: Group 1 (1-3 years loading), Group 2 (3-5 years loading), and Group 3 (over 5 years loading). Probing depth, resonance frequency analysis (ISQ value), and marginal bone loss were evaluated. The data obtained underwent statistical analysis. Overall, 78 patients were included in the study, who received, in total, 111 dental implants, all replacing single teeth. Mean probing depth was 3.03 mm and mean ISQ was 65.54. Regarding marginal bone loss, in Group 1, 67.6% of implants did not undergo any thread loss, in Group 2, 48.3%, and in Group 3, 59.6%; 59.10% of all implants did not present thread loss with a mean bone loss of 0.552 mm. The implant survival rate was 99.1%, and the success rate was 96.37%. Implants with a double acid-etched surface showed excellent success rates in terms of marginal bone loss, ISQ, and probing depth after up to 10 years of loading, making them a clinically predictable treatment option. Future studies are needed to compare this implant surface with other types in different restorative situations.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是评估经过双重酸蚀表面处理的牙种植体在加载后长达10年的评估时间内的存活率和成功率。本研究在一家医院的口腔外科和种植科进行。研究纳入了111颗具有双重酸蚀表面的牙种植体。将其分为三组:第1组(加载1 - 3年)、第2组(加载3 - 5年)和第3组(加载超过5年)。评估了探诊深度、共振频率分析(ISQ值)和边缘骨吸收情况。对获得的数据进行了统计分析。总体而言,78名患者纳入本研究,共接受了111颗牙种植体,均为单颗牙置换。平均探诊深度为3.03毫米,平均ISQ为65.54。关于边缘骨吸收,在第1组中,67.6%的种植体未发生任何螺纹骨吸收,第2组为48.3%,第3组为59.6%;所有种植体中有59.10%未出现螺纹骨吸收,平均骨吸收为0.552毫米。种植体存活率为99.1%,成功率为96.37%。具有双重酸蚀表面的种植体在加载长达10年后,在边缘骨吸收、ISQ和探诊深度方面显示出优异的成功率,使其成为一种临床可预测的治疗选择。未来需要开展研究,在不同修复情况下将这种种植体表面与其他类型进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/1365d894a37a/materials-14-06483-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/f3f5fe19d73f/materials-14-06483-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/6757b8425bc2/materials-14-06483-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/4a6a9df53076/materials-14-06483-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/1c7358ae556e/materials-14-06483-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/00e9df6bca37/materials-14-06483-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/7343d9028077/materials-14-06483-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/1365d894a37a/materials-14-06483-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/f3f5fe19d73f/materials-14-06483-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/6757b8425bc2/materials-14-06483-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/4a6a9df53076/materials-14-06483-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/1c7358ae556e/materials-14-06483-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/00e9df6bca37/materials-14-06483-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/7343d9028077/materials-14-06483-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0755/8585230/1365d894a37a/materials-14-06483-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical Evaluation of Dental Implants with a Double Acid-Etched Surface Treatment: A Cohort Observational Study with Up to 10-Year Follow-Up.采用双重酸蚀表面处理的牙种植体的临床评价:一项长达10年随访的队列观察研究
Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;14(21):6483. doi: 10.3390/ma14216483.
2
Comparative Results of Single Implants With and Without Laser-Microgrooved Collar Placed and Loaded with Different Protocols: A Long-Term (7 to 10 years) Retrospective Multicenter Study.单植入体比较研究:有无激光微螺纹颈圈植入及不同负载方案的长期(7-10 年)回顾性多中心研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):841-849. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7605.
3
Periodic Assessment of Peri-implant Tissue Changes: Imperative for Implant Success.种植体周围组织变化的定期评估:种植成功的必要条件
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Feb 1;20(2):173-178.
4
Radiographic and clinical outcomes of rooted, platform-switched, microthreaded implants with a sandblasted, large-grid, and acid-etched surface: A 5-year prospective study.喷砂酸蚀大颗粒表面根面成型、平台转换、微螺纹种植体的放射学及临床效果:5 年前瞻性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017 Dec;19(6):1074-1081. doi: 10.1111/cid.12543. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.采用经化学改良的喷砂酸蚀表面的非潜入式钛种植体早期负荷:一项聚焦于种植体周骨变化和种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)值的下颌后牙区前瞻性病例系列研究的 6 个月结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
6
Stability, marginal bone loss and survival of standard and modified sand-blasted, acid-etched implants in bilateral edentulous spaces: a prospective 15-month evaluation.双侧无牙颌中标准和改良喷砂酸蚀种植体的稳定性、边缘骨丧失和存活率:前瞻性 15 个月评估。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Aug;22(8):840-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02065.x. Epub 2010 Dec 28.
7
Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.即刻加载种植体在拔牙窝中的应用:5 年临床结果的回顾性分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
8
Clinical outcome of 802 immediately loaded 2-stage submerged implants with a new grit-blasted and acid-etched surface: 12-month follow-up.802颗采用新型喷砂和酸蚀表面的两段式潜入式即刻负重种植体的临床结果:12个月随访
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006 Sep-Oct;21(5):763-8.
9
Six-Year Radiographic, Clinical, and Soft Tissue Outcomes of Immediately Loaded, Straight-Walled, Platform-Switched, Titanium-Alloy Implants with Nanosurface Topography.具有纳米表面形貌的直壁、平台转换钛合金种植体即刻负载的六年影像学、临床及软组织结果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Jan-Feb;31(1):167-71. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4162.
10
A multi-center study comparing dual acid-etched and machined-surfaced implants in various bone qualities.一项比较双酸蚀和机械加工表面种植体在不同骨质量中的多中心研究。
J Periodontol. 2001 Oct;72(10):1384-90. doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1384.

引用本文的文献

1
How to Enhance Dental Implant Therapies and Definitive Restoration Outcomes to Reduce Complications and Improve Patient Well-Being.如何加强牙种植治疗及最终修复效果以减少并发症并改善患者健康状况。
Materials (Basel). 2023 May 15;16(10):3730. doi: 10.3390/ma16103730.
2
Impact of Platform Switched Implants on Marginal Bone Level in Mandibular Overdentures: A Six-Year Follow-Up Longitudinal Study.平台转换种植体对下颌覆盖义齿边缘骨水平的影响:一项为期六年的纵向随访研究。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022 Oct 19;14:307-319. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S378636. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Propolis in the Treatment of Periodontal Disease: Updated Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.蜂胶治疗牙周病的有效性:更新的系统评价与荟萃分析
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;10(2):269. doi: 10.3390/antiox10020269.
2
Allergies to Titanium Dental Implants: What Do We Really Know about Them? A Scoping Review.钛牙种植体过敏:我们对其究竟了解多少?一项范围综述。
Biology (Basel). 2020 Nov 18;9(11):404. doi: 10.3390/biology9110404.
3
Bioactive Surfaces vs. Conventional Surfaces in Titanium Dental Implants: A Comparative Systematic Review.
钛牙种植体中生物活性表面与传统表面的比较系统评价
J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 29;9(7):2047. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072047.
4
The influence of submerged healing abutment or subcrestal implant placement on soft tissue thickness and crestal bone stability. A 2-year randomized clinical trial.种植体愈合基台或种植体颈侧置埋对软组织厚度和牙槽嵴稳定性的影响。一项为期 2 年的随机临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Aug;22(4):497-506. doi: 10.1111/cid.12903. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
5
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Treatment with Dental Implants with Acid Etched Surface.酸蚀表面种植牙治疗的长期临床结果
Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 27;13(7):1553. doi: 10.3390/ma13071553.
6
Influence of the Titanium Implant Surface Treatment on the Surface Roughness and Chemical Composition.钛植入物表面处理对表面粗糙度和化学成分的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 9;13(2):314. doi: 10.3390/ma13020314.
7
A Systematic Review of Survival Rates of Osseointegrated Implants in Fully and Partially Edentulous Patients Following Immediate Loading.即刻负重后全口和部分缺牙患者骨结合种植体存活率的系统评价
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 4;8(12):2142. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122142.
8
Use of resonance frequency analysis to evaluate the effects of surface properties on the stability of different implants.使用共振频率分析评估表面特性对不同种植体稳定性的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Mar;31(3):239-245. doi: 10.1111/clr.13560. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
9
Effect of Peri-implant Keratinized Tissue Width on Tissue Health and Stability: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.种植体周围角化组织宽度对组织健康和稳定性的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1307-1317. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7622.
10
Influence of marginal bone loss on peri-implantitis: Systematic review of literature.边缘骨丢失对种植体周围炎的影响:文献系统综述
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Nov 1;11(11):e1045-e1071. doi: 10.4317/jced.56202. eCollection 2019 Nov.