Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Community Guide Office, Office of the Associate Director for Policy and Strategy, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Jan;62(1):e45-e55. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.06.021. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
Intimate partner violence and sexual violence are widespread and often occur early in life. This systematic review examines the effectiveness of interventions for primary prevention of intimate partner violence and sexual violence among youth.
Studies were identified from 2 previous systematic reviews and an updated search (January 2012-June 2016). Included studies were implemented among youth, conducted in high-income countries, and aimed to prevent or reduce the perpetration of intimate partner violence or sexual violence. In 2016-2017, Guide to Community Preventive Services (Community Guide) methods were used to assess effectiveness as determined by perpetration, victimization, or bystander action. When heterogeneity of outcomes prevented usual Community Guide methods, the team systematically applied criteria for favorability (statistically significant at p<0.05 or approaching significance at p<0.10) and consistency (75% of results in the same direction).
A total of 28 studies (32 arms) met inclusion and quality of execution criteria. Interventions used combinations of teaching healthy relationship skills, promoting social norms to protect against violence, or creating protective environments. Overall, 18 of 24 study arms reported favorable results on the basis of the direction of effect for decreasing perpetration; however, favorability for bystander action diminished with longer follow-up. Interventions did not demonstrate consistent results for decreasing victimization. A bridge search conducted during Fall 2020 confirmed these results.
Interventions for the primary prevention of intimate partner violence and sexual violence are effective in reducing perpetration. Increasing bystander action may require additional follow-up as effectiveness diminishes over time. Findings may inform researchers, school personnel, public health, and other decision makers about effective strategies to prevent intimate partner violence and sexual violence among youth.
亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力普遍存在,且通常发生在生命早期。本系统评价研究了针对青年人群亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力的初级预防干预措施的有效性。
本研究从两项先前的系统评价和一项更新的检索(2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月)中确定了研究。纳入的研究针对青年人群实施,在高收入国家开展,并旨在预防或减少亲密伴侣暴力或性暴力的发生。在 2016-2017 年,采用社区预防服务指南(社区指南)方法评估有效性,其通过施暴行为、受害情况或旁观者行为来判断。当结局的异质性妨碍了通常的社区指南方法时,团队系统地应用了有利性(在 p<0.05 时具有统计学意义或在 p<0.10 时接近显著)和一致性(75%的结果为同一方向)标准。
共有 28 项研究(32 个研究组)符合纳入标准和执行质量标准。干预措施采用教授健康的人际关系技能、促进防止暴力的社会规范或创建保护环境相结合的方式。总体而言,24 个研究组中有 18 个组根据减少施暴行为的效果方向报告了有利结果;然而,随着随访时间的延长,旁观者行为的有利性减弱。干预措施对减少受害情况没有一致的效果。2020 年秋季进行的桥梁搜索证实了这些结果。
针对亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力的初级预防干预措施在减少施暴行为方面是有效的。要提高旁观者行为,可能需要随着时间的推移增加额外的随访,因为有效性会逐渐减弱。这些发现可能为研究人员、学校人员、公共卫生和其他决策者提供信息,了解预防青年人群亲密伴侣暴力和性暴力的有效策略。