Suppr超能文献

植入深度与人工耳蜗言语识别效果:28mm 和 31.5mm 侧墙电极的比较研究。

Insertion Depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition Outcomes: A Comparative Study of 28- and 31.5-mm Lateral Wall Arrays.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Otol Neurotol. 2022 Feb 1;43(2):183-189. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003416.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

  1. To compare speech recognition outcomes between cochlear implant (CI) recipients of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode arrays, and 2) to characterize the relationship between angular insertion depth (AID) and speech recognition.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic referral center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-five adult CI recipients of fully inserted 28-mm (n = 28) or 31.5-mm (n = 47) lateral wall arrays listening with a CI-alone device.

INTERVENTIONS

Cochlear implantation with postoperative computed tomography.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) word recognition assessed with the CI-alone at 12 months postactivation.

RESULTS

The mean AID of the most apical electrode contact for the 31.5-mm array recipients was significantly deeper than the 28-mm array recipients (628° vs 571°, p < 0.001). Following 12 months of listening experience, mean CNC word scores were significantly better for recipients of 31.5-mm arrays compared with those implanted with 28-mm arrays (59.5% vs 48.3%, p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.70; 95% CI [0.22, 1.18]). There was a significant positive correlation between AID and CNC word scores (r = 0.372, p = 0.001), with a plateau in performance observed around 600°.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implant recipients implanted with a 31.5-mm array experienced better speech recognition than those with a 28-mm array at 12 months postactivation. Deeper insertion of a lateral wall array appears to confer speech recognition benefit up to ∼600°, with a plateau in performance observed thereafter. These data provide preliminary evidence of the insertion depth necessary to optimize speech recognition outcomes for lateral wall electrode arrays among CI-alone users.

摘要

目的

1)比较使用 28 毫米和 31.5 毫米侧墙电极阵列的人工耳蜗植入(CI)受者的言语识别结果,2)描述角度插入深度(AID)与言语识别的关系。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

设置

三级学术转诊中心。

患者

75 名成年 CI 受者,他们使用完全插入的 28 毫米(n=28)或 31.5 毫米(n=47)侧墙阵列,使用 CI 单独设备进行听力测试。

干预措施

在术后进行计算机断层扫描。

主要观察指标

在激活后 12 个月,使用 CI 单独设备评估辅音-核-辅音(CNC)单词识别。

结果

31.5 毫米阵列受者的最顶端电极接触的平均 AID 明显深于 28 毫米阵列受者(628° vs 571°,p<0.001)。在 12 个月的听力体验后,31.5 毫米阵列受者的 CNC 单词得分明显优于 28 毫米阵列受者(59.5% vs 48.3%,p=0.004;Cohen's d=0.70;95%CI [0.22, 1.18])。AID 与 CNC 单词得分之间存在显著正相关(r=0.372,p=0.001),在大约 600°处观察到性能的平台。

结论

在激活后 12 个月,使用 31.5 毫米阵列的 CI 受者的言语识别能力优于使用 28 毫米阵列的受者。侧墙阵列的更深插入似乎可以提供言语识别益处,最高可达约 600°,此后性能出现平台。这些数据初步证明了在 CI 单独使用的情况下,优化侧墙电极阵列言语识别结果所需的插入深度。

相似文献

4
Influence of Age at Cochlear Implantation and Frequency-to-Place Mismatch on Early Speech Recognition in Adults.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Jun;162(6):926-932. doi: 10.1177/0194599820911707. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
5
Cochlear coverage with lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays affects post-operative speech recognition.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 12;18(7):e0287450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287450. eCollection 2023.
7
Insertion depth impacts speech perception and hearing preservation for lateral wall electrodes.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2352-2357. doi: 10.1002/lary.26467. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
8
Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Laryngoscope. 2021 Sep;131(9):2106-2111. doi: 10.1002/lary.29663. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Electrode-Modiolus Distance Affects Speech Perception for Lateral Wall Electrodes.
Otol Neurotol. 2023 Dec 1;44(10):e702-e709. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004019. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
10
Speech Recognition Performance Differences Between Precurved and Straight Electrode Arrays From a Single Manufacturer.
Otol Neurotol. 2022 Dec 1;43(10):1149-1154. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003703. Epub 2022 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

2
A Level-Adjusted Cochlear Frequency-to-Place Map for Estimating Tonotopic Frequency Mismatch With a Cochlear Implant.
Ear Hear. 2025;46(4):963-975. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001641. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
3
Influence of cochlear coverage on speech perception in single sided deafness, bimodal, and bilateral implanted cochlear implant patients.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Apr;282(4):1853-1863. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-09086-x. Epub 2024 Dec 17.
4
Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Feb;282(2):701-712. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08950-0. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
5
How to vocode: Using channel vocoders for cochlear-implant research.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2024 Apr 1;155(4):2407-2437. doi: 10.1121/10.0025274.
6
Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth on Speech Perception Outcomes: A Systematic Review.
Otol Neurotol Open. 2023 Dec 14;3(4):e045. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000045. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Word Recognition with a Cochlear Implant in Relation to Prediction and Electrode Position.
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):183. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010183.
8
Otological Planning Software-OTOPLAN: A Narrative Literature Review.
Audiol Res. 2023 Oct 18;13(5):791-801. doi: 10.3390/audiolres13050070.
10
Comparison of speech perception in bimodal cochlear implant patients with respect to the cochlear coverage.
HNO. 2024 Jan;72(Suppl 1):17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01327-5. Epub 2023 Aug 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验