Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen Street, Suite 8100, Newark, NJ, 07103, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2022 Feb;164(2):565-573. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05055-z. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
Epilepsy surgery continues to be profoundly underutilized despite its safety and effectiveness. We sought to investigate factors that may contribute to this phenomenon, with a particular focus on the antecedent underutilization of appropriate preoperative studies.
We reviewed patient data from a pediatric epilepsy clinic over an 18-month period. Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) were categorized according to brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings (lesional, MRI-negative, or multifocal abnormalities) and type of epilepsy diagnosis based on semiology and electroencephalography (EEG) (focal or generalized). We then analyzed the rates of diagnostic test utilization, surgical referral, and subsequent epilepsy surgery as well as vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).
Of the 249 patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy, 138 (55.4%) were found to have DRE. Excluding the 10 patients with DRE who did not undergo MRI, 76 patients (59.4%) were found to be MRI-negative (non-lesional epilepsy), 37 patients (28.9%) were found to have multifocal abnormalities, and 15 patients (11.7%) were found to have a single epileptogenic lesion on MRI (lesional epilepsy). Positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were each completed in nine patients (7.0%) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in four patients (3.1%). Despite the low utilization rate of adjunctive studies, over half (56.3%) ultimately underwent VNS alone, and 8.6% ultimately underwent definitive intracranial resection or disconnection surgery.
The underutilization of appropriate non-invasive, presurgical testing in patients with focal DRE may in part explain the continued underutilization of definitive, resective/disconnective surgery. For patients without access to a high-volume, multidisciplinary surgical epilepsy center, adjunctive presurgical studies [e.g., PET, SPECT, MEG, electrical source imaging (ESI), EEG-functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)], even when available, are rarely ordered, and this may contribute to excessive rates of VNS in lieu of definitive intracranial surgery.
尽管癫痫手术安全且有效,但它的应用仍严重不足。我们试图研究可能导致这种现象的因素,特别关注术前研究不足的情况。
我们回顾了 18 个月内小儿癫痫诊所的患者数据。根据磁共振成像(MRI)结果(病变、MRI 阴性或多灶性异常)和根据症状学和脑电图(EEG)(局灶性或全面性)进行的癫痫诊断类型,将耐药性癫痫(DRE)患者进行分类。然后,我们分析了诊断性检测的使用率、手术转诊率、随后的癫痫手术以及迷走神经刺激(VNS)率。
在 249 例癫痫诊断患者中,有 138 例(55.4%)被诊断为 DRE。排除 10 例未行 MRI 的 DRE 患者,76 例(59.4%)为 MRI 阴性(非病变性癫痫),37 例(28.9%)为多灶性异常,15 例(11.7%)为 MRI 上单个致痫病变(病变性癫痫)。正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)分别在 9 例(7.0%)和 4 例(3.1%)患者中完成。尽管辅助研究的利用率较低,但超过一半(56.3%)最终单独接受了 VNS,8.6%最终接受了明确的颅内切除或离断手术。
局灶性 DRE 患者适当的非侵入性术前检测的利用率低,可能部分解释了明确的、可切除/离断性手术的持续低利用率。对于无法进入大容量、多学科手术癫痫中心的患者,辅助术前检查(如 PET、SPECT、MEG、电源成像(ESI)、EEG-功能磁共振成像(fMRI))即使可用,也很少被订购,这可能导致过度使用 VNS 替代明确的颅内手术。