MannKind Corporation, 30930 Russell Ranch Rd, Suite 300, Westlake Village, CA, 91362, USA.
Profil, Neuss, Germany.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2022 Mar;61(3):413-422. doi: 10.1007/s40262-021-01084-0. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
This study was performed to satisfy a US Food and Drug Administration post-marketing requirement to compare the dose responses for Technosphere Insulin (TI; MannKind Corporation, Westlake Village, CA, USA) and subcutaneous insulin lispro (LIS) across a wide range of doses.
This single-center, open-label, randomized, cross-over study defined the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic curves for inhaled TI vs subcutaneous LIS in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Each volunteer received six treatments while undergoing euglycemic clamps: three doses of TI (10, 30 and 120 U) and LIS (8, 30, and 90 U). Primary endpoint was area under the glucose infusion rate vs time curve from start of treatment administration to end of clamp. Key secondary endpoints included readouts of insulin exposure and timing of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles.
Insulin exposure was more than dose proportional, increasing with dose for LIS and dose for TI. Time to reach 10% of the maximum glucose infusion rate was 7 to 15 min for TI vs 21 to 38 min for LIS. End of effect was dose dependent for both treatments, ranging from 2 to 6 h (TI) and 5 to 10 h (LIS). Glucose infusion rate exhibited saturation for both treatments. Technosphere Insulin produced a lesser total effect per unit insulin than LIS due to its faster absorption and correspondingly shorter duration of exposure. The difference was large enough to require significantly different doses to achieve the same total effect.
Technosphere Insulin has a considerably faster onset and shorter duration of action than LIS. Consequently, the overall effect of TI is smaller than that of LIS and unit-for-unit dose conversion is not appropriate.
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02470637; 12 June, 2015.
本研究旨在满足美国食品和药物管理局的一项上市后要求,即在广泛的剂量范围内比较 Technosphere Insulin(TI;MannKind Corporation,加利福尼亚州西湖村)和皮下胰岛素赖脯(LIS)的剂量反应。
这项单中心、开放标签、随机、交叉研究定义了 1 型糖尿病患者吸入 TI 与皮下 LIS 的药代动力学/药效学曲线。
每个志愿者在进行血糖钳夹时接受六种治疗:三种剂量的 TI(10、30 和 120 U)和 LIS(8、30 和 90 U)。主要终点是从治疗开始到钳夹结束时葡萄糖输注率与时间曲线下的面积。关键次要终点包括胰岛素暴露和药代动力学/药效学曲线出现时间的读数。
胰岛素暴露与剂量不成比例,LIS 和 TI 的剂量均增加。达到最大葡萄糖输注率的 10%所需的时间为 TI 的 7 至 15 分钟,而 LIS 的 21 至 38 分钟。两种治疗的作用结束均取决于剂量,范围为 2 至 6 小时(TI)和 5 至 10 小时(LIS)。两种治疗均表现出葡萄糖输注率的饱和。由于 TI 吸收更快,相应的暴露时间更短,因此每单位胰岛素的总效应小于 LIS。差异之大,以至于需要使用显著不同的剂量才能达到相同的总效果。
TI 的起效速度明显快于 LIS,作用持续时间也短于 LIS。因此,TI 的整体效果小于 LIS,单位剂量转换并不合适。
ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02470637;2015 年 6 月 12 日。