Department of Medicine D, Division of General Internal and Emergency Medicine, Nephrology, Hypertension and Rheumatology, University Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Emergency Department, University Hospital of Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 13;29(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00973-4.
While there are clear national resuscitation room admission guidelines for major trauma patients, there are no comparable alarm criteria for critically ill nontrauma (CINT) patients in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to define and validate specific trigger factor cut-offs for identification of CINT patients in need of a structured resuscitation management protocol.
All CINT patients at a German university hospital ED for whom structured resuscitation management would have been deemed desirable were prospectively enrolled over a 6-week period (derivation cohort, n = 108). The performance of different thresholds and/or combinations of trigger factors immediately available during triage were compared with the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score. Identified combinations were then tested in a retrospective sample of consecutive nontrauma patients presenting at the ED during a 4-week period (n = 996), and two large external datasets of CINT patients treated in two German university hospital EDs (validation cohorts 1 [n = 357] and 2 [n = 187]).
The any-of-the-following trigger factor iteration with the best performance in the derivation cohort included: systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, oxygen saturation < 90%, and Glasgow Coma Scale score < 15 points. This set of triggers identified > 80% of patients in the derivation cohort and performed better than NEWS and qSOFA scores in the internal validation cohort (sensitivity = 98.5%, specificity = 98.6%). When applied to the external validation cohorts, need for advanced resuscitation measures and hospital mortality (6.7 vs. 28.6%, p < 0.0001 and 2.7 vs. 20.0%, p < 0.012) were significantly lower in trigger factor-negative patients.
Our simple, any-of-the-following decision rule can serve as an objective trigger for initiating resuscitation room management of CINT patients in the ED.
虽然有明确的国家复苏室入院指南适用于重大创伤患者,但对于急诊科(ED)中的非创伤性危重病(CINT)患者,尚无可比的报警标准。本研究的目的是定义和验证特定的触发因素临界值,以识别需要结构化复苏管理方案的 CINT 患者。
在德国一所大学医院 ED 中,对在 6 周期间前瞻性纳入的所有需要结构化复苏管理的 CINT 患者(推导队列,n=108)进行研究。比较了不同的阈值和/或在分诊时立即可用的触发因素组合与国家早期预警评分(NEWS)和快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分的性能。然后在 ED 连续就诊的非创伤性患者的回顾性样本中对确定的组合进行测试(n=996),并在两个德国大学医院 ED 治疗的 CINT 患者的两个大型外部数据集(验证队列 1 [n=357]和 2 [n=187])中进行测试。
推导队列中表现最佳的任何以下触发因素迭代包括:收缩压<90mmHg、氧饱和度<90%和格拉斯哥昏迷评分<15 分。这组触发因素在推导队列中识别出>80%的患者,并且在内部验证队列中的表现优于 NEWS 和 qSOFA 评分(敏感性=98.5%,特异性=98.6%)。当应用于外部验证队列时,在触发因素阴性患者中,需要进行高级复苏措施和医院死亡率显著降低(6.7% vs. 28.6%,p<0.0001 和 2.7% vs. 20.0%,p<0.012)。
我们的简单、任何以下决策规则可以作为触发因素,用于启动 ED 中 CINT 患者的复苏室管理。