Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Canada.
Department of Anthropology and the Pembroke Center for Teaching and Research on Women, Brown University, United States.
Women Birth. 2022 Sep;35(5):484-492. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
PROBLEM & BACKGROUND: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, policies have been implemented to limit interpersonal contact in clinical and community settings. The impacts of pandemic-related policies on experiences of pregnancy and birth are crucial to investigate and learn from.
To examine the impact of pandemic policy changes on experiences of pregnancy and birth, thereby identifying barriers to good care; to inform understandings of medicalization, care, pregnancy, and subjectivity during times of crisis; and to critically examine the assumptions about pregnancy and birth that are sustained and produced through policy.
Qualitative descriptive study drawing on 67 in-depth interviews with people who were pregnant and/or gave birth in Canada during the pandemic. The study took a social constructionist standpoint and employed thematic analysis to derive meaning from study data.
The pandemic has resulted in an overall scaling back of perinatal care alongside the heavy use of interventions (e.g., induction of labour, cesarian section) in response to pandemic stresses and uncertainties. Intervention use here is an outcome of negotiation and collaboration between pregnant people and their care providers as they navigate pregnancy and birth in stressful, uncertain conditions.
Continuity of care throughout pregnancy and postpartum, labour support persons, and non-clinical services and interventions for pain management are all essential components of safe maternal healthcare. However, pandemic perinatal care demonstrates that they are not viewed as such.
The pandemic has provided an opportunity to restructure Canadian reproductive health care to better support and encourage out-of-hospital births - including midwife-assisted births - for low-risk pregnancies.
自加拿大 COVID-19 大流行以来,已实施了多项政策以限制临床和社区环境中的人际接触。大流行相关政策对妊娠和分娩体验的影响至关重要,需要进行调查并从中吸取经验教训。
研究大流行政策变化对妊娠和分娩体验的影响,从而找出护理障碍;了解在危机时期医学化、护理、妊娠和主体性的相关情况;批判性地审视通过政策维持和产生的关于妊娠和分娩的假设。
采用定性描述性研究方法,对 67 名在大流行期间怀孕和/或分娩的加拿大居民进行了深入访谈。该研究采用社会建构主义立场,并运用主题分析从研究数据中得出意义。
大流行导致围产期护理全面缩减,同时由于大流行的压力和不确定性,大量使用干预措施(例如引产、剖腹产)。这里的干预措施使用是怀孕者及其护理提供者在紧张、不确定的条件下协商和合作的结果,他们共同应对妊娠和分娩。
妊娠和产后的连续护理、分娩支持人员以及非临床服务和疼痛管理干预措施都是安全产妇医疗保健的重要组成部分。然而,围产期大流行护理表明,这些措施并未被视为如此。
大流行为加拿大生殖健康护理提供了一个机会,可以更好地支持和鼓励低风险妊娠的非住院分娩,包括助产士协助分娩。