Suppr超能文献

修正性截肢与再植对创伤性指断离后功能结局的影响:一项基于多中心前瞻性队列的比较研究。

Contribution of revision amputation vs replantation for certain digits to functional outcomes after traumatic digit amputations: A comparative study based on multicenter prospective cohort.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 80 PLA Hospital, No. 256, Beigong West Street, Weifang City, Shandong, China Department of Hand Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, No. 76, Nanguo Road, Nanshaomen, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106164. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic digit amputations can result in significant impairment. Optimal surgical treatment is unclear for certain digits in various amputation patterns. Our aim was to compare the contribution of revision amputation vs replantation for each particular digit to functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study at three tertiary hospitals was conducted in China. Eligible participants were 3192 patients with traumatic digit amputations enrolled from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2018. The primary outcome was Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) scores 2 years after initial surgery. Secondary outcome was score on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH).

RESULTS

Of 3192 enrolled patients, 2890 completed the study. Main-effect linear regression showed that participants with replantation of thumb, index, long, and ring (proximal to the proximal interphalangeal [PIP] joint) fingers had significantly better MHQ scores compared to participants with the corresponding finger revision amputation. DASH results were comparable. Finger-finger interaction analyses conducted with multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) revealed that the small finger and ring finger had the smallest and greatest interactions with other fingers, respectively. After stratification by amputation level of thumb, index finger, or long finger, linear regression showed that replantation of the ring finger distal to the PIP joint resulted in better MHQ and DASH when the thumb or long finger was also traumatically amputated proximal to the IP/PIP joint.

CONCLUSIONS

Replantation of the thumb, index, long, and ring (proximal to PIP joint) fingers is preferable to revision amputation, regardless of amputation pattern. Replantation of the ring finger amputated distal to PIP was beneficial only when the thumb or long finger was amputated proximal to IP/PIP joint. Replantation or revision amputation of the small finger was indistinguishable in terms of functional outcome. Future investigations and clinical decisions should take into account the role of finger-finger interactions.

摘要

背景

创伤性断指会导致严重的功能障碍。对于不同的断指模式,某些特定手指的最佳手术治疗方法尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较每个特定手指的再截肢与再植对功能结果的影响。

材料和方法

在中国的三家三级医院进行了前瞻性队列研究。纳入的合格参与者是 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 1 日期间因创伤性断指就诊的 3192 名患者。主要结局是初始手术后 2 年的密歇根手功能问卷(MHQ)评分。次要结局是手臂、肩部和手残疾(DASH)评分。

结果

在纳入的 3192 名患者中,有 2890 名完成了研究。主效应线性回归显示,与相应手指再截肢相比,拇指、食指、中指和环指(近指间关节 [PIP] 关节)再植的患者 MHQ 评分显著更好。DASH 结果相当。采用多因素维度缩减(MDR)进行的手指-手指相互作用分析显示,小指和环指分别与其他手指的相互作用最小和最大。在拇指、食指或中指再截肢水平分层后,线性回归显示,当拇指或中指也在 IP/PIP 关节近端外伤性截肢时,PIP 关节远端的环指再植导致更好的 MHQ 和 DASH。

结论

无论截肢模式如何,拇指、食指、中指和环指(近 PIP 关节)的再植优于再截肢。只有当拇指或中指在 IP/PIP 关节近端截肢时,PIP 关节远端的环指再植才有益。小指的再植或再截肢在功能结果方面没有区别。未来的研究和临床决策应考虑手指间相互作用的作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验