• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

断指再植与断指截除术后的功能结局比较

Functional outcome after digit replantation versus amputation.

机构信息

Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center, Eberhard-Karls University Tuebingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of General and Visceral Surgery Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jul 27;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00654-7.

DOI:10.1186/s10195-022-00654-7
PMID:35896899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9329495/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The success of digit replantation is mainly based on survival rates. The functional outcome as well as the recovery of sensibility are essential parameters for judging the outcome after digit replantation but have been poorly assessed in previous studies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-eight patients with 56 complete traumatic digit amputations occurring between 2008 and 2013 returned for a follow-up examination, the earliest being 6 months postoperatively. Each patient's range of motion, fingertip-to-table distance, fingertip-to-palm distance, grip and pinch strengths, static two-point discrimination (2-PD), and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) test level were assessed in order to compare functional outcome and recovery of sensibility between successful replantation (n = 19) and primary or secondary amputation (n = 37). Subjective assessments of the pain level and function of the upper extremity were performed using the numerical rating scale and the DASH score, respectively.

RESULTS

Replanted digits achieved 58% of the median total range of motion of the corresponding uninjured digits. Grip and pinch strength were not significantly different after thumb or finger replantation or amputation. Recovery of sensibility was excellent after replantation, with a median static 2-PD of 5 mm and a reduction of pressure sensibility of two levels of the SWM test compared to the contralateral side. After amputation, the median static 2-PD was also very good, with a median value of 6 mm and a reduction of pressure sensibility of only one level according to the SWM test. There was significantly less pain after replantation at rest (p = 0.012) and under strain (p = 0.012) compared to patients after amputation. No significant differences were observed in the DASH score between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Comparable functional results and sensory recovery but significantly less pain at rest and under strain can be expected after digit replantation when compared to digit amputation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

摘要

背景

断指再植的成功主要取决于成活率。功能结果和感觉恢复是判断断指再植后结果的重要参数,但在以前的研究中评估较差。

患者和方法

2008 年至 2013 年间共有 48 例 56 例完全创伤性断指患者接受随访检查,最早为术后 6 个月。评估每个患者的关节活动度、指尖到桌面的距离、指尖到手掌的距离、握力和捏力强度、静态两点辨别觉(2-PD)和 Semmes-Weinstein 单丝(SWM)测试水平,以比较成功再植(n=19)与初次或二次截肢(n=37)之间的功能结果和感觉恢复。使用数字评分量表和 DASH 评分分别对疼痛水平和上肢功能进行主观评估。

结果

再植手指的总活动度中位数达到相应未受伤手指的 58%。拇指或手指再植或截肢后,握力和捏力无明显差异。再植后感觉恢复良好,静态 2-PD 中位数为 5mm,与对侧相比,SWM 测试压力感觉降低两个级别。截肢后,静态 2-PD 也非常好,中位数为 6mm,SWM 测试压力感觉仅降低一个级别。与截肢患者相比,再植患者在休息时(p=0.012)和在压力下(p=0.012)的疼痛明显减轻。两组间 DASH 评分无显著差异。

结论

与断指截肢相比,断指再植后可获得相当的功能结果和感觉恢复,但休息和压力下的疼痛明显减轻。

证据等级

IV。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/7e035fff1f01/10195_2022_654_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/09a186e91ab3/10195_2022_654_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/8f914b80c820/10195_2022_654_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/249aad9e3f75/10195_2022_654_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/875d835d46f5/10195_2022_654_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/50b2d70ff2df/10195_2022_654_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/81d67c4b2191/10195_2022_654_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/7e035fff1f01/10195_2022_654_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/09a186e91ab3/10195_2022_654_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/8f914b80c820/10195_2022_654_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/249aad9e3f75/10195_2022_654_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/875d835d46f5/10195_2022_654_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/50b2d70ff2df/10195_2022_654_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/81d67c4b2191/10195_2022_654_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63eb/9329495/7e035fff1f01/10195_2022_654_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Functional outcome after digit replantation versus amputation.断指再植与断指截除术后的功能结局比较
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Jul 27;23(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00654-7.
2
Patient-Reported and Functional Outcomes After Revision Amputation and Replantation of Digit Amputations: The FRANCHISE Multicenter International Retrospective Cohort Study.患者报告的和功能结果后,修订截肢和再植的数字截肢: FRANCHISE 多中心国际回顾性队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):637-646. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0418.
3
Long-term functional, subjective and psychological results after single digit replantation.单指再植后的长期功能、主观感受及心理结果
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2018 Mar;52(2):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2017.09.001. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
4
Replantation of digit-tip amputation caused by crush injuries with supermicrosurgery technique.应用超微外科技术再植挤压性断指指尖。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1497-1502. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02485-z. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
5
Functional and cosmetic outcome of single-digit ray amputation in hand.手部单指射线截肢的功能和美容效果。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2017 Dec;101(3):275-281. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0484-x. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
6
Predictors of Hand Dexterity after Single-Digit Replantation.单指再植后手灵巧性的预测因素。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Mar;35(3):194-197. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669446. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
7
Long-Term Outcomes of Successful Fingertip Replantation: A Follow-Up of at Least 10 Years.成功指尖再植的长期结果:至少 10 年的随访。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov;146(5):1059-1069. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007247.
8
[Management of finger-level avulsion injuries].[手指离断伤的处理]
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2007 Dec;39(6):396-402. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965732.
9
Replantation for multiple digit amputations: A retrospective analysis of the clinical results.多指离断再植:临床结果的回顾性分析
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Nov;73(11):1995-2000. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.077. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
Contribution of revision amputation vs replantation for certain digits to functional outcomes after traumatic digit amputations: A comparative study based on multicenter prospective cohort.修正性截肢与再植对创伤性指断离后功能结局的影响:一项基于多中心前瞻性队列的比较研究。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106164. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Return-to-Work After Attempted Digit Replantation: A Systematic Review of 31 Studies.断指再植术后重返工作岗位:31项研究的系统评价
Hand (N Y). 2024 Sep 26:15589447241279445. doi: 10.1177/15589447241279445.
2
Analyzing attempt and success factors for amputated digit replantation in Japan using the diagnosis procedure combination database.利用诊断程序组合数据库分析日本断指再植的尝试和成功因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 28;14(1):12156. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62879-2.
3
Functional Outcomes in Upper Limb Replantation-A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Contribution of revision amputation vs replantation for certain digits to functional outcomes after traumatic digit amputations: A comparative study based on multicenter prospective cohort.修正性截肢与再植对创伤性指断离后功能结局的影响:一项基于多中心前瞻性队列的比较研究。
Int J Surg. 2021 Dec;96:106164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106164. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
2
A 17-Year Experience in Hand and Digit Replantation at an Academic Center.一家学术中心的 17 年断肢(指、趾)再植经验
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Oct 1;148(4):816-824. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008314.
3
Comparing digital replantation versus revision amputation patient reported outcomes for traumatic digital amputations of the hand: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
上肢再植的功能结局——一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 24;13(5):1289. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051289.
4
Outcomes following replantation surgery.再植手术后的结果。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Oct;34(7):3709-3715. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03729-1. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
比较手部创伤性断指的数字化再植与 Revision 截肢患者报告结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Microsurgery. 2021 Jul;41(5):488-497. doi: 10.1002/micr.30738. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
Test-retest reliability of tip, key, and palmar pinch force sense in healthy adults.健康成年人中指尖、钥匙捏力和掌捏力感觉的重测信度。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Mar 26;21(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-3187-7.
5
The Preferred Management of a Single-Digit Distal Phalanx Amputation.单指末节断指的最佳处理方式。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020 May;36(4):301-310. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1701013. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Patient-Reported and Functional Outcomes After Revision Amputation and Replantation of Digit Amputations: The FRANCHISE Multicenter International Retrospective Cohort Study.患者报告的和功能结果后,修订截肢和再植的数字截肢: FRANCHISE 多中心国际回顾性队列研究。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):637-646. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0418.
7
Predictors of Hand Dexterity after Single-Digit Replantation.单指再植后手灵巧性的预测因素。
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 Mar;35(3):194-197. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1669446. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
Initial Management of Traumatic Digit Amputations: A Retrospective Study of Functional Outcomes.创伤性断指的初始处理:功能结局的回顾性研究
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018 May;34(4):250-257. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1626692. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
9
Long-Term Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Digital Replantation versus Revision Amputation.数字再植与翻修截肢术后长期健康相关生活质量结局
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017 Jul;33(6):446-451. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601052. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
10
Evaluation of sensory recovery after reconstruction of digital nerves of the hand using muscle-in-vein conduits in comparison to nerve suture or nerve autografting.与神经缝合或自体神经移植相比,使用静脉内肌肉导管重建手部指神经后感觉恢复的评估。
Microsurgery. 2014 Nov;34(8):608-15. doi: 10.1002/micr.22302. Epub 2014 Aug 2.