Wu Haoliang, Wang Zhiwei, Li Mingxing, Liu Qi, Li Hongbin, Yang Hongfu, Sun Peng, Wei Shunbo, Liu Yuanfeng, Qiao Zhentao, Bai Tao, Liu Weiping, Bai Hualong
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Emergency Intensive Care Ward, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;81:324-332. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.10.032. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
Spiral saphenous vein grafts (SSVG) or paneled vein grafts (PVG) can be used when the diameter of the autologous great saphenous vein does not match the vessel that needs to be repaired. This study aimed to present early results of complex vascular reconstruction with SSVGs and PVGs in the lower extremities.
From May 2019 through January 2021, 6 SSVGs and 3 PVGs were used for vascular reconstruction in 9 patients. Patient data were collected retrospectively, including age, gender, cause of vascular pathology, target vessels, concomitant injury, surgical method, additional surgical methods, and hemodynamic status. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the rate of freedom from reintervention.
Among these patients, 7 had trauma, 1 had graft infection, and 1 had vascular reconstruction after tumor excision. The mean duration of follow-up was 6 ± 6.6 months (range 1-19 months). The rate of freedom from reintervention for any reason was 77.8% at 1 year. Two patients underwent amputation after vascular reconstruction with patent vascular reconstructions. One of the 2 amputations was performed because of infection, and the other was due to ischemia >24 hr. The success rate of reconstruction was 100%, and the primary patency rate was 100%. The rate of limb salvage was 77.8%. There was no death, bleeding, embolism, skin ulcers, graft-related complication, or aneurysmal dilation during follow-up.
SSVG and PVG were associated with low infection rates and satisfactory short-term patency rates. Both 2 grafts may be good choices when there is a diameter mismatch in vascular reconstructions.
当自体大隐静脉直径与需要修复的血管不匹配时,可使用螺旋大隐静脉移植物(SSVG)或拼接静脉移植物(PVG)。本研究旨在展示下肢采用SSVG和PVG进行复杂血管重建的早期结果。
2019年5月至2021年1月,9例患者采用6个SSVG和3个PVG进行血管重建。回顾性收集患者数据,包括年龄、性别、血管病变原因、目标血管、伴随损伤、手术方法、附加手术方法和血流动力学状态。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算再次干预的无复发生存率。
这些患者中,7例有创伤,1例有移植物感染,1例在肿瘤切除后进行血管重建。平均随访时间为6±6.6个月(范围1 - 19个月)。1年时任何原因导致的再次干预无复发生存率为77.8%。2例患者在血管重建后血管通畅但仍接受了截肢手术。2例截肢手术中,1例是因为感染,另1例是因为缺血超过24小时。重建成功率为100%,一期通畅率为100%。肢体挽救率为77.8%。随访期间无死亡、出血、栓塞、皮肤溃疡、移植物相关并发症或动脉瘤样扩张。
SSVG和PVG感染率低,短期通畅率令人满意。在血管重建中出现直径不匹配的情况时,这两种移植物可能都是不错的选择。