Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Fertility Clinic, Brussels, Belgium; Research Laboratory on Human Reproduction, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium.
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
ESMO Open. 2021 Dec;6(6):100300. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100300. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
Knowledge is growing on the safety of assisted reproductive techniques (ART) in cancer survivors. No data exist, however, for the specific population of breast cancer patients harboring germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants.
This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study across 30 centers worldwide including women diagnosed at ≤40 years with stage I-III breast cancer, between January 2000 and December 2012, harboring known germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. Patients included in this analysis had a post-treatment pregnancy either achieved through use of ART (ART group) or naturally (non-ART group). ART procedures included ovulation induction, ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and embryo transfer under hormonal replacement therapy.
Among the 1424 patients registered in the study, 168 were eligible for inclusion in the present analysis, of whom 22 were in the ART group and 146 in the non-ART group. Survivors in the ART group conceived at an older age compared with those in the non-ART group (median age: 39.7 versus 35.4 years, respectively). Women in the ART group experienced more delivery complications compared with those in the non-ART group (22.1% versus 4.1%, respectively). No other apparent differences in obstetrical outcomes were observed between cohorts. The median follow-up from pregnancy was 3.4 years (range: 0.8-8.6 years) in the ART group and 5.0 years (range: 0.8-17.6 years) in the non-ART group. Two patients (9.1%) in the ART group experienced a disease-free survival event (specifically, a locoregional recurrence) compared with 40 patients (27.4%) in the non-ART group. In the ART group, no patients deceased compared with 10 patients (6.9%) in the non-ART group.
This study provides encouraging safety data on the use of ART in breast cancer survivors harboring germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, when natural conception fails or when they opt for ART in order to carry out preimplantation genetic testing.
关于辅助生殖技术(ART)在癌症幸存者中的安全性的知识正在不断增加。然而,对于携带种系 BRCA1/2 致病性变异的乳腺癌患者这一特定人群,尚无相关数据。
这是一项跨越全球 30 个中心的多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1999 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间诊断为 I-III 期乳腺癌且年龄≤40 岁的女性患者,这些患者携带已知的种系 BRCA1/2 致病性变异。本分析纳入的患者在治疗后通过使用 ART(ART 组)或自然妊娠(非 ART 组)实现了妊娠。ART 程序包括促排卵、体外受精或胞浆内精子注射的卵巢刺激,以及在激素替代治疗下的胚胎移植。
在研究中登记的 1424 名患者中,有 168 名符合本分析的纳入标准,其中 22 名患者在 ART 组,146 名患者在非 ART 组。与非 ART 组相比,ART 组的患者受孕年龄更大(中位数年龄分别为 39.7 岁和 35.4 岁)。与非 ART 组相比,ART 组的产妇并发症更多(分别为 22.1%和 4.1%)。两组间的其他产科结局无明显差异。ART 组的中位妊娠随访时间为 3.4 年(范围:0.8-8.6 年),而非 ART 组为 5.0 年(范围:0.8-17.6 年)。在 ART 组中,有 2 名患者(9.1%)发生无疾病生存事件(具体为局部复发),而非 ART 组有 40 名患者(27.4%)发生该事件。在 ART 组中,无患者死亡,而非 ART 组有 10 名患者(6.9%)死亡。
当自然妊娠失败或为了进行胚胎植入前遗传学检测而选择 ART 时,本研究为携带种系致病性变异的乳腺癌幸存者使用 ART 提供了令人鼓舞的安全性数据。