Psoriasis-Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Dermatology. 2022;238(4):615-619. doi: 10.1159/000519924. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
After registration of drugs, evidence about efficacy and safety is solely based on data of phase 2/3 clinical trial programs. A major drawback is the selection of patients following inclusion/exclusion criteria. There is a considerable time and knowledge gap between study and registry data that evaluate real-world evidence (RWE). To close this gap, prospective cohort data are helpful.
Soon after tildrakizumab, an interleukin 23p19-inhibitor, was registered for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, a prospective single-center cohort study was established to evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab in daily practice.
Following approval of tildrakizumab, patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis eligible for systemic treatment were included into the Kiel Tildra Cohort (KTC) and followed using routine assessments of efficacy, psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), dermatology life quality index (DLQI), itch (visual analog scale), and safety. Data of the KTC were compared to the respective phase 3 clinical trials.
The KTC included 150 patients differing substantially from those in the trial program. There was a high rate of previous systemic (87.3%) and biologic (31.8%) therapy and of comorbidity in the KTC as compared to the phase 3 studies. Due to the best practice approach, baseline PASI was lower in the KTC, but DLQI was similar in both groups. At the time of this analysis, 126 patients completed week 28, 92 patients week 52, and 58 patients week 76, respectively. There was a constant improvement in PASI, BSA, DLQI, and itch from baseline until week 76. There was no clinically meaningful laboratory abnormality.
Patients treated in routine practice with tildrakizumab differed substantially from the phase 3 studies. Despite systemic pre-treatment and increased comorbidity, tildrakizumab showed comparable efficacy and safety in the KTC. Prospective cohort studies are a suitable tool to generate RWE before registry data become available.
药物注册后,疗效和安全性的证据仅基于 2/3 期临床试验的数据。一个主要的缺点是根据纳入/排除标准选择患者。在研究和评估真实世界证据(RWE)的数据之间存在相当大的时间和知识差距。为了缩小这一差距,前瞻性队列数据很有帮助。
在白细胞介素 23p19 抑制剂替度鲁单抗注册后不久,建立了一项前瞻性单中心队列研究,以评估替度鲁单抗在日常实践中的疗效和安全性。
在替度鲁单抗获得批准后,符合全身治疗条件的中度至重度斑块型银屑病患者被纳入基尔替德拉队列(KTC),并通过疗效常规评估、银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)、体表面积(BSA)、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)、瘙痒(视觉模拟评分)和安全性进行随访。KTC 的数据与相应的 3 期临床试验进行了比较。
KTC 纳入的 150 名患者与试验方案中的患者有很大的不同。与 3 期研究相比,KTC 中有很高的既往全身(87.3%)和生物(31.8%)治疗率和合并症率。由于采用了最佳实践方法,KTC 的基线 PASI 较低,但两组的 DLQI 相似。在本次分析时,分别有 126 名患者完成了第 28 周、92 名患者完成了第 52 周、58 名患者完成了第 76 周。从基线到第 76 周,PASI、BSA、DLQI 和瘙痒均持续改善。没有临床上有意义的实验室异常。
在常规实践中接受替度鲁单抗治疗的患者与 3 期研究中的患者有很大的不同。尽管有系统的前期治疗和合并症增加,替度鲁单抗在 KTC 中显示出相似的疗效和安全性。前瞻性队列研究是在注册数据可用之前生成 RWE 的合适工具。