Suppr超能文献

明确认知生态位:论外部认知表征在解释累积文化中的重要性。

Making Cognitive Niches Explicit: On the Importance of External Cognitive Representations in Accounting for Cumulative Culture.

作者信息

Hohol Mateusz, Wołoszyn Kinga, Brożek Bartosz

机构信息

Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Front Integr Neurosci. 2021 Oct 27;15:734930. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2021.734930. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Cumulative transmission and innovation are the hallmark properties of the cultural achievements of human beings. Cognitive scientists have traditionally explained these properties in terms of social learning and creativity. The non-social cognitive dimension of cumulative culture, the so-called technical reasoning, has also been accounted for recently. These explanatory perspectives are methodologically individualistic since they frame cumulative and innovative culture in terms of the processing of inner cognitive representations. Here we show that going beyond methodological individualism could facilitate an understanding of why some inventions are disseminated in a stable form and constitute the basis for further modifications. Drawing on three cases of cognitive history of prominent achievements of Antiquity, i.e., Homerian epics, Euclidean geometry, and Roman law, we investigate which properties of cognitive artifacts shaped cognitive niches for modifying original cognitive tasks or developing new ones. These niches both constrained and enabled the cognitive skills of humans to promote cumulative culture and further innovations. At the same time, we claim that "wide cognition," incorporating both intracranial resources and external cognitive representations, constitutes a platform for building explanations of cognitive phenomena developing over a historical time scale.

摘要

累积传播和创新是人类文化成就的标志性特征。传统上,认知科学家用社会学习和创造力来解释这些特征。累积文化的非社会认知维度,即所谓的技术推理,最近也得到了解释。这些解释视角在方法论上是个人主义的,因为它们从内部认知表征的处理角度来界定累积性和创新性文化。在这里,我们表明超越方法论个人主义有助于理解为什么有些发明以稳定的形式传播,并构成进一步改进的基础。借鉴古代杰出成就的三个认知史案例,即荷马史诗、欧几里得几何和罗马法,我们研究了认知人工制品的哪些属性塑造了认知生态位,以修改原始认知任务或开发新的认知任务。这些生态位既限制又促进了人类的认知技能,以推动累积文化和进一步创新。同时,我们认为,包含颅内资源和外部认知表征的“宽泛认知”构成了一个平台,用于构建对在历史时间尺度上发展的认知现象的解释。

相似文献

1
Making Cognitive Niches Explicit: On the Importance of External Cognitive Representations in Accounting for Cumulative Culture.
Front Integr Neurosci. 2021 Oct 27;15:734930. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2021.734930. eCollection 2021.
2
The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture.
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 19;43:e156. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19003236.
4
Innovation and social transmission in experimental micro-societies: exploring the scope of cumulative culture in young children.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 5;372(1735). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0425.
5
Not by transmission alone: the role of invention in cultural evolution.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 5;376(1828):20200049. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0049. Epub 2021 May 17.
6
Bringing cumulative technological culture beyond copying versus reasoning.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2023 Jan;27(1):30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.09.024. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
7
Toddlers, Tools, and Tech: The Cognitive Ontogenesis of Innovation.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Jan;25(1):81-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
Cultural Evolutionary Perspectives on Creativity and Human Innovation.
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Dec;30(12):736-754. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
9
Time, space, and events in language and cognition: a comparative view.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Oct;1326:72-81. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12491. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
10
[Cognitive explanations of auditory verbal hallucinations in schizophrenia: An inventory of the scientific literature].
Encephale. 2020 Jun;46(3):217-221. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 Mar 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Cultural Artifacts Transform Embodied Practice: How a Sommelier Card Shapes the Behavior of Dyads Engaged in Wine Tasting.
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02671. eCollection 2019.
2
The elephant in the room: What matters cognitively in cumulative technological culture.
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Nov 19;43:e156. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19003236.
3
Culture in the world shapes culture in the head (and vice versa).
Behav Brain Sci. 2019 Sep 12;42:e172. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19001079.
4
What happened to cognitive science?
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;3(8):782-791. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0626-2. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
5
From Wide Cognition to Mechanisms: A Silent Revolution.
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 6;9:2393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393. eCollection 2018.
6
Imitation and Innovation: The Dual Engines of Cultural Learning.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Nov;19(11):688-699. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
The promises and perils of the neuroscience of creativity.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 5;7:246. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00246. eCollection 2013.
9
Colloquium paper: the cognitive niche: coevolution of intelligence, sociality, and language.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 11;107 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):8993-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914630107. Epub 2010 May 5.
10
Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:653-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验