Landersdorfer Cornelia B, Nation Roger L
Drug Delivery, Disposition and Dynamics, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Oct 29;12:770518. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.770518. eCollection 2021.
Within a few years after the first successful clinical use of penicillin, investigations were conducted in animal infection models to explore a range of factors that were considered likely to influence the antibacterial response to the drug. Those studies identified that the response was influenced by not only the total daily dose but also the interval between individual doses across the day, and whether penicillin was administered in an intermittent or continuous manner. Later, as more antibiotics were discovered and developed, antimicrobial pharmacologists began to measure antibiotic concentrations in biological fluids. This enabled the linking of antibacterial response at a single time point in an animal or infection model with one of three summary pharmacokinetic (PK) measures of exposure to the antibiotic. The summary PK exposure measures were normalised to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), an measure of the pharmacodynamic (PD) potency of the drug. The three PK-PD indices (ratio of maximum concentration to MIC, ratio of area under the concentration-time curve to MIC, time concentration is above MIC) have been used extensively since the 1980s. While these MIC-based summary PK-PD metrics have undoubtedly facilitated the development of new antibiotics and the clinical application of both new and old antibiotics, it is increasingly recognised that they have a number of substantial limitations. In this article we use a historical perspective to review the origins of the three traditional PK-PD indices before exploring in detail their limitations and the implications arising from those limitations. Finally, in the interests of improving antibiotic development and dosing in patients, we consider a model-based approach of linking the full time-course of antibiotic concentrations with that of the antibacterial response. Such an approach enables incorporation of other factors that can influence treatment outcome in patients and has the potential to drive model-informed precision dosing of antibiotics into the future.
在青霉素首次成功用于临床后的几年内,人们在动物感染模型中开展了研究,以探索一系列被认为可能影响药物抗菌反应的因素。这些研究表明,抗菌反应不仅受每日总剂量的影响,还受一天中各剂之间的间隔时间以及青霉素是以间歇方式还是连续方式给药的影响。后来,随着更多抗生素的发现和研发,抗菌药理学家开始测量生物体液中的抗生素浓度。这使得能够将动物或感染模型中单个时间点的抗菌反应与抗生素暴露的三种汇总药代动力学(PK)指标之一联系起来。汇总的PK暴露指标被标准化为最低抑菌浓度(MIC),这是药物药效学(PD)效力的一种度量。自20世纪80年代以来,这三种PK-PD指数(最大浓度与MIC之比、浓度-时间曲线下面积与MIC之比、浓度高于MIC的时间)得到了广泛应用。虽然这些基于MIC的汇总PK-PD指标无疑促进了新抗生素的研发以及新旧抗生素的临床应用,但人们越来越认识到它们存在一些重大局限性。在本文中,我们从历史角度回顾了三种传统PK-PD指数的起源,然后详细探讨它们的局限性以及这些局限性所带来的影响。最后,为了改进抗生素研发和患者给药方案,我们考虑一种基于模型的方法,即将抗生素浓度的整个时间过程与抗菌反应的时间过程联系起来。这种方法能够纳入其他可能影响患者治疗结果的因素,并有可能推动未来基于模型的抗生素精准给药。