Zhang Zengqiao, Wang Wu, Song Yongjia, Zhai Tianjun, Zhu Yan, Jiang Liming, Li Qunfeng, Jin Lei, Li Kunpeng, Feng Wei
Department of Rehabilitation, Seventh People's Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
School of Rehabilitation Science, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 29;12:745618. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.745618. eCollection 2021.
Hand spasticity after stroke influences the rehabilitation of hand function. Immediate and effective relief of spasticity potentially creates conditions for later rehabilitation training, which has far-reaching significance in the smooth transition of patients to the recovery period. To evaluate the immediate effect of dry needling (DN) at myofascial trigger point on hand spasticity in stroke patients. This was a prospective, evaluator blind, multicenter, randomized controlled study. A total of 210 participants were randomly divided into DN group (DN, = 70), sham dry needling group (SDN, = 70), and control group ( = 70). Participants in the DN group were treated with DN at myofascial trigger point five times (30 min each time) every week for 4 weeks. Subjects in the SDN group were manipulated the same way as in the DN group, except that the acupuncture site was located in the area adjacent to the myofascial trigger point, which constituted a SDN. Routine rehabilitation treatment was performed for participants in the two groups and in the control group. The primary evaluation index was the immediate effect of hand spasticity relief. Secondary evaluation indicators included the cumulative effect of hand spasticity relief from baseline to week 4, and the changes in flexion angles of the wrist, thumb, and fingers 2-5 in the rest position before, immediately after, and 4 weeks after intervention. The immediate effective rate of spasticity relief (thumb, fingers 2-5, and wrist) of patients with different degrees of spasticity in the DN group was higher than that in the control and SDN groups (thumb, χ = 55.833, < 0.001; fingers 2-5, χ = 68.096, < 0.001; wrist, χ = 49.180, < 0.001) ( < 0.05). The effective rate of spasticity relief from baseline to 4 weeks in the DN group exceeded that in the control group and SDN groups (thumb, χ = 8.806, = 0.012; fingers 2-5, χ = 8.087, = 0.018; and wrist, χ = 8.653, = 0.013) ( < 0.05). No difference in immediate and cumulative effect was found between the control group and SDN group. The change of joints flexion angles in resting position before and after each treatment in the DN group was higher than that in the control and SDN groups ( < 0.05), but it was not significantly different between the control group and SDN group. At 4 weeks, although the change in the DN group was higher than that in the control group and SDN group, this difference was not statistically significant ( > 0.05). Dry needling can relieve varying degrees of hand spasticity instantly in post-stroke. www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1900022379.
中风后手痉挛会影响手部功能的康复。及时有效地缓解痉挛可为后期康复训练创造条件,这对患者顺利过渡到恢复期具有深远意义。为评估肌筋膜触发点干针疗法(DN)对中风患者手部痉挛的即时疗效。这是一项前瞻性、评估者盲法、多中心、随机对照研究。共210名参与者被随机分为DN组(DN,n = 70)、假干针组(SDN,n = 70)和对照组(n = 70)。DN组参与者每周在肌筋膜触发点进行5次DN治疗(每次30分钟),共4周。SDN组受试者的操作方式与DN组相同,只是针刺部位位于肌筋膜触发点相邻区域,构成假干针治疗。两组和对照组的参与者均进行常规康复治疗。主要评估指标为手部痉挛缓解的即时疗效。次要评估指标包括从基线到第4周手部痉挛缓解的累积疗效,以及干预前、干预后即刻和干预后4周休息位时腕关节、拇指及2 - 5指的屈曲角度变化。DN组不同程度痉挛患者的痉挛缓解即时有效率(拇指、2 - 5指和腕关节)高于对照组和SDN组(拇指,χ = 55.833,P < 0.001;2 - 5指,χ = 68.096,P < 0.001;腕关节,χ = 49.180,P < 0.001)(P < 0.05)。DN组从基线到4周的痉挛缓解有效率超过对照组和SDN组(拇指,χ = 8.806,P = 0.012;2 - 5指,χ = 8.087,P = 0.018;腕关节,χ = 8.653,P = 0.013)(P < 0.05)。对照组和SDN组在即时和累积疗效上无差异。DN组每次治疗前后休息位关节屈曲角度的变化高于对照组和SDN组(P < 0.05),但对照组和SDN组之间无显著差异。在4周时,尽管DN组的变化高于对照组和SDN组,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。干针疗法可即时缓解中风后不同程度的手部痉挛。www.chictr.org.cn,ChiCTR1900022379