Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Development and Regeneration, University Hospital of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Apr;60(2):225-232. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08224-8. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
INTRODUCTION: Spasticity is a common problem in stroke patients. Treatments of spasticity often have side effects or are insufficiently effective. Dry needling (DN) has been proposed as a potential additional option to consider in the multimodal treatment of post-stroke spasticity, although questions about its safety remain. The goal of this study is to assess the safety of DN in stroke patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search in Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CIHNAL and PEDro was conducted in June 2023. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts according to the eligibility criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five articles were included in this review. Only six studies reported adverse events, all of which were considered minor. None of the included studies reported any serious adverse events. In four of the included studies anticoagulants were regarded as contra-indicative for DN. Anticoagulants were not mentioned in the other included studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature concerning the safety of DN in stroke patients. This review is the first to investigate the safety of DN in stroke patients and based on the results there is insufficient evidence regarding the safety of DN in stroke patients. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Although DN could be a promising treatment in post-stroke spasticity, further research is indicated to investigate its mechanism of action and its effect on outcome. However, before conducting large clinical trials to assess outcome parameters, the safety of DN in stroke patients must be further investigated.
简介:痉挛是脑卒中患者的常见问题。痉挛的治疗常常有副作用或效果不足。干针疗法(DN)已被提议作为脑卒中后痉挛的多模式治疗的潜在附加选择,尽管关于其安全性的问题仍然存在。本研究的目的是评估 DN 在脑卒中患者中的安全性。
证据获取:2023 年 6 月,在 Medline、Embase、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CIHNAL 和 PEDro 中进行了系统搜索。两名审查员根据入选标准独立筛选摘要。
证据综合:本综述共纳入 25 篇文章。只有 6 项研究报告了不良事件,所有这些不良事件均被认为是轻微的。纳入的研究均未报告任何严重不良事件。在纳入的 4 项研究中,抗凝剂被认为是 DN 的禁忌证。其他纳入的研究均未提及抗凝剂。
结论:关于 DN 在脑卒中患者中的安全性的文献很少。本综述是首次调查 DN 在脑卒中患者中的安全性,根据结果,DN 在脑卒中患者中的安全性证据不足。
临床康复影响:尽管 DN 可能是脑卒中后痉挛的一种有前途的治疗方法,但需要进一步研究来调查其作用机制及其对结局的影响。然而,在进行评估结局参数的大型临床试验之前,必须进一步调查 DN 在脑卒中患者中的安全性。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024-4
Physiother Theory Pract. 2024-7
J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2022-8-31
J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2024-8-31
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-9-28
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022-10
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2023-3
Pain Res Manag. 2022