雪貂犬牙对逆行性根管充填的组织反应：玻璃离子水门汀与牙胶加封闭剂的比较

Tissue response to retrograde root fillings in the ferret canine: a comparison of a glass ionomer cement and gutta-percha with sealer.

作者信息

Callis P D, Santini A

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Edinburgh, Scotland.

出版信息

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987 Oct;64(4):475-9. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(87)90156-3.

DOI:10.1016/0030-4220(87)90156-3

PMID:3477771

Abstract

Tissue healing was compared after apicectomy and filling of ferret lower canines with glass ionomer (Ketacfil) or gutta-percha/sealer (Tubliseal). Both materials provoked an inflammatory response after 7 days, but the response to glass ionomer was less severe. The response after 28 days was different. Mild inflammation related to the gutta-percha was still present, but no inflammation was found in relation to the glass ionomer. Bone infill was quite advanced in all specimens at 28 days but was more complete in the glass ionomer specimens, with intimate contact between the bone and cement.

摘要

对雪貂下颌尖牙进行根尖切除术并用玻璃离子水门汀（Ketacfil）或牙胶/封闭剂（Tubliseal）充填后，比较组织愈合情况。两种材料在7天后均引发炎症反应，但对玻璃离子水门汀的反应较轻。28天后的反应有所不同。与牙胶相关的轻度炎症仍然存在，但未发现与玻璃离子水门汀相关的炎症。在28天时，所有标本中的骨填充都相当明显，但在玻璃离子水门汀标本中更完整，骨与粘固剂之间紧密接触。