Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛

Postoperative Pain After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.

作者信息

Lindström Per, Rietz Göran, Everhov Åsa Hallqvist, Sandblom Gabriel

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2021 Oct 28;8:724026. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.724026. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Robot-assisted ventral hernia repair, when performed correctly, may reduce the risk for pain and discomfort in the postoperative period thus enabling shorter hospital stay. The aim of the present study was to evaluate postoperative pain following robot-assisted laparoscopic repair. The approach was selected after an intraoperative decision to complete the repair as: (1). Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair (TAPP); (2). Trans-Abdominal RetroMuscular (TARM) repair; or (3). Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) repair depending on anatomical conditions. Twenty ventral hernia repairs, 8 primary and 12 incisional, were included between 18th Dec 2017 and 11th Nov 2019. There were 8 women, mean age was 60.3 years, and mean diameter of the defect was 3.8 cm. The repairs were performed at Södersjukhuset (Southern General Hospital, Stockholm) using the Da Vinci Si Surgical System®. Sixteen repairs were completed with the TAPP technique, 2 with the TARM technique, and 2 as IPOM repair. Mean hospital stay was 1.05 days. No postoperative infection was seen, and no recurrence was seen at 1 year. At the 30-day follow-up, fifteen patients (75%) rated their pain as zero or pain that was easily ignored, according to the Ventral Hernia Pain Questionnaire. After 1 year no one had pain that was not easily ignored. The present study shows that robot-assisted laparoscopic ventral hernia is feasible and safe. More randomized controlled trials are needed to show that the potential benefits in terms of shorter operation times, earlier discharge, and less postoperative pain motivate the extra costs associated with the robot technique.

摘要

机器人辅助腹疝修补术若操作得当,可降低术后疼痛和不适的风险,从而缩短住院时间。本研究的目的是评估机器人辅助腹腔镜修补术后的疼痛情况。手术方式根据术中决定完成修补的方式选择为:(1)经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP);(2)经腹肌后修补术(TARM);或(3)腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM),具体取决于解剖情况。2017年12月18日至2019年11月11日期间纳入了20例腹疝修补术,其中8例为原发性,12例为切口疝。有8名女性,平均年龄为60.3岁,缺损平均直径为3.8厘米。修补手术在南泰利耶医院(斯德哥尔摩南部综合医院)使用达芬奇Si手术系统®进行。16例修补术采用TAPP技术完成,2例采用TARM技术,2例采用IPOM修补术。平均住院时间为1.05天。未观察到术后感染,1年时未观察到复发。在30天随访时,根据腹疝疼痛问卷,15名患者(75%)将其疼痛评为零或疼痛程度很容易被忽略。1年后,没有人有难以忽略的疼痛。本研究表明,机器人辅助腹腔镜腹疝修补术是可行且安全的。需要更多的随机对照试验来证明,在缩短手术时间、提前出院和减轻术后疼痛方面的潜在益处是否足以抵消与机器人技术相关的额外费用。

相似文献

1
Postoperative Pain After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair.机器人辅助腹腔镜腹疝修补术后疼痛
Front Surg. 2021 Oct 28;8:724026. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.724026. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

3
Robotic-assisted surgical treatment of complex giant incisional hernias: A report of 3 cases.机器人辅助手术治疗复杂巨大切口疝:3例报告
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Oct 28;49(10):1700-1705. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240293.

本文引用的文献

5
MILOS and EMILOS repair of primary umbilical and epigastric hernias.MILOS 和 EMILOS 修复脐疝和腹上疝。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):935-944. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02056-x. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
7
Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Transabdominal Preperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹疝修补术的可行性
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Apr;28(4):434-438. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0595. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
10
Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias.原发性及切口性腹壁疝的分类
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x. Epub 2009 Jun 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验