Robotic Assisted Hernia Repair in Four Nordic Countries - Status and Challenges.
作者信息
Helgstrand Frederik, Rietz Göran, Törnqvist Björn, Lambrecht Jan Roland, Gaupset Robin, Rautio Tero, Vironen Jaana
机构信息
Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Stockholm South General Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
出版信息
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Jun 27;3:13224. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13224. eCollection 2024.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Robotic Assisted Hernia Repair in Four Nordic Countries - Status and Challenges.北欧四国的机器人辅助疝气修补术——现状与挑战
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024 Jun 27;3:13224. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13224. eCollection 2024.
2
Long-term quality of life and outcomes following robotic assisted TAPP inguinal hernia repair.机器人辅助经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后的长期生活质量及预后
J Robot Surg. 2018 Jun;12(2):261-269. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0727-8. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
3
Design of a comparative outcome analysis of open, laparoscopic, or robotic-assisted incisional or inguinal hernia repair utilizing surgeon experience and a novel follow-up model.利用外科医生经验和新型随访模型设计开放式、腹腔镜式或机器人辅助切口疝或腹股沟疝修补术的对比结局分析。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Nov;86:105853. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105853. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
4
Robotic-assisted repair of complex ventral hernia: can it pay off?机器人辅助修复复杂的腹疝：是否值得？
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):45-52. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01078-3. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
5
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a comprehensive cost analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜单侧腹股沟疝修补术：全面的成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3436-3443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06606-9. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
6
Robotic-assisted repair of incisional hernia-early experiences of a university robotic hernia program and comparison with open and minimally invasive sublay technique (eMILOS).机器人辅助切口疝修补术-大学机器人疝项目的早期经验及与开放和微创经腹腔入路腹膜前修补术（eMILOS）的比较。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 12;408(1):396. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03129-3.
7
Economic assessment of starting robot-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in a single-centre retrospective comparative study: the EASTER study.在单中心回顾性对照研究中开展机器人辅助腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的经济评估：EASTER 研究。
BJS Open. 2021 Jan 8;5(1). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa046.
8
Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair: a multicenter evaluation of clinical outcomes.机器人辅助腹疝修补术：临床结局的多中心评估
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1342-1349. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5118-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
9
Current status and future perspectives of robotic inguinal hernia repair.机器人腹股沟疝修补术的现状与展望。
Surg Today. 2022 Oct;52(10):1395-1404. doi: 10.1007/s00595-021-02413-3. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
10
Safety and short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia in pioneering hospitals in Japan: A nationwide retrospective cohort study.日本开拓医院机器人辅助经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的安全性和短期结果：一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13251. doi: 10.1111/ases.13251. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
引用本文的文献
1
From Meshes to Minimally Invasive Techniques: A Comprehensive Review of Modern Hernia Repair Approaches.从补片到微创技术：现代疝修补方法的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66206. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66206. eCollection 2024 Aug.
本文引用的文献
1
The rise of robotic colorectal surgery: better for patients and better for surgeons.机器人结直肠手术的兴起：对患者和外科医生都更好。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 8;18(1):69. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01822-z.
2
Transferring laparoscopic skills to robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review.将腹腔镜技能转移到机器人辅助手术中：系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 12;18(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01757-x.
3
Short-term outcomes after open versus robot-assisted repair of ventral hernias: a nationwide database study.开放手术与机器人辅助修复腹疝的短期结果：全国数据库研究。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):233-240. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02923-8. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Laparoscopic versus robotic TAPP/TEP inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter, propensity score weighted study.腹腔镜与机器人经腹腹膜前修补术/完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝：一项多中心、倾向评分加权研究。
Hernia. 2024 Feb;28(1):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02916-7. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
5
Robotic right versus left colectomy for colorectal neoplasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助右半结肠切除术与左半结肠切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤：一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):1907-1915. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01649-0. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
6
Short-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic IPOM Versus Robot-assisted Retromuscular Repair of Small to Medium Ventral Hernias: A Nationwide Database Study.腹腔镜 IPOM 与机器人辅助后入路肌间修补术治疗小至中型腹外疝的短期疗效比较：一项全国性数据库研究。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):154-159. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005915. Epub 2023 May 22.
7
Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic primary ventral and incisional hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与机器人原发性腹侧和切口疝修补术的患者报告结局：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Apr;27(2):245-257. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02733-4. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
8
A retrospective review of a large series of groin hernia patients operated with robotically assisted laparoscopic technique (R-TAPP).回顾性分析了一系列采用机器人辅助腹腔镜技术（R-TAPP）治疗的腹股沟疝患者。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):653-658. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01474-x. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
9
Less postoperative pain and shorter length of stay after robot-assisted retrorectus hernia repair (rRetrorectus) compared with laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) for small or medium-sized ventral hernias.与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片修补术（IPOM）治疗中小尺寸腹外疝相比，机器人辅助腹直肌后入路疝修补术（rRetrorectus）术后疼痛更少，住院时间更短。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Feb;37(2):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09608-w. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
10
Open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic posterior component separation in complex abdominal wall repair.开放式与机器人辅助腹腔镜下腹膜后组件分离在复杂腹壁修复中的应用比较。
BJS Open. 2022 May 2;6(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac057.
Zotero 插件