Chovanec Kelli, Arsene Camelia, Gomez Cheryl, Brixey Molly, Tolles Diana, Galliers Jennifer Wheaton, Kopaniasz Renee, Bobash Tiffany, Goodwin Lamar
ProMedica Health System, Care Navigation, Toledo, OH, USA.
ProMedica Cancer Institute, ProMedica Flower Hospital, Sylvania, OH, USA.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Dec;18(6):332-338. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12548. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
An evidence-based practice (EBP) approach to implementing change is relevant and pertinent to the strategy to improve outcomes for hospitalized patients with central venous catheters (CVC). As health systems endeavor to achieve the ambitious goals of improving the patient experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing the cost of health care, it is imperative to understand the impact of a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) on outcomes.
The purpose of the study was to contribute to the evidence of the association of CLABSI with the outcomes of hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, and mortality rates for hospitalized patients.
A retrospective study was conducted, including all hospitalized patients with a CVC within four hospitals in an integrated health system in northwest Ohio and southeast Michigan. The sample population was stratified into two groups, CLABSI and no CLABSI, and the outcomes of interest for each group were compared.
The findings substantiate the association between CLABSI and the hospital mortality rate, LOS, and readmission. Patients with a CVC who develop a CLABSI were 36.6% more likely to die in the hospital and 37.0% more likely to be readmitted compared with patients with a CVC who did not develop a CLABSI. In addition, hospital LOS increased an average of 2 days compared with patients without CLABSI. This study evokes implications for EBP change to reduce the rate of CLABSI and for quality improvement during in-hospital care.
There is an association between CLABSI and hospital mortality rate, LOS, and 30-day readmission outcomes, presenting a profound sense of urgency for EBP change. There were potential variances in processes or practice relative to insertion, maintenance, and removal in the hospitals studied, representing an opportunity to examine the best practices in the hospitals that are performing well. Implementation of EBP requires selecting effective and innovative strategies, with a focus on stakeholder involvement and needs.
采用基于证据的实践(EBP)方法来实施变革,与改善中心静脉导管(CVC)住院患者的治疗效果策略相关且切题。随着医疗系统努力实现改善患者护理体验、增进人群健康以及降低医疗成本这些宏伟目标,了解中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)对治疗效果的影响至关重要。
本研究的目的是为CLABSI与住院患者的住院时长(LOS)、再入院率和死亡率之间的关联提供证据。
进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了俄亥俄州西北部和密歇根州东南部一个综合医疗系统内四家医院的所有CVC住院患者。样本人群分为两组,即CLABSI组和非CLABSI组,并对两组的相关治疗效果进行比较。
研究结果证实了CLABSI与医院死亡率、住院时长和再入院之间的关联。与未发生CLABSI的CVC患者相比,发生CLABSI的CVC患者在医院死亡的可能性高36.6%,再次入院的可能性高37.0%。此外,与未发生CLABSI的患者相比,住院时长平均增加了2天。本研究引发了对EBP变革以降低CLABSI发生率以及对住院护理期间质量改进的思考。
CLABSI与医院死亡率、住院时长和30天再入院治疗效果之间存在关联,这凸显了EBP变革的紧迫性。在所研究的医院中,与导管插入、维护和拔除相关的流程或实践可能存在差异,这为研究表现良好的医院的最佳实践提供了契机。实施EBP需要选择有效且创新的策略,重点是利益相关者的参与和需求。