• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓前静脉溶栓治疗的 Meta 分析。

Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurology Stroke Research Center Fujian Medical University Union Hospital Fuzhou China.

Institute of Clinical Neurology Fujian Medical University Fuzhou China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022303. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022303. Epub 2021 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.121.022303
PMID:34779235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9075352/
Abstract

Background Whether intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy provides additional benefit for functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke remains uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of direct mechanical thrombectomy (dMT) to mechanical thrombectomy with bridging using intravenous thrombolysis (bridging therapy [BT]) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods and Results We performed a literature search in the PubMed, Excerpta Medica database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1, 2003, to April 26, 2021. We included randomized clinical trials and observational studies that reported the 90-day functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing dMT compared with BT. The 12 included studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 9 observational studies) yielded 3924 participants (mean age, 68.0 years [SD, 13.1 years]; women, 44.2%; 1887 participants who received dMT and 2037 participants who received BT). A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial and observational data revealed similar 90-day functional independence (odds ratio [OR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.19), mortality (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.36), and successful recanalization (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.76-1.14) for patients treated with dMT or BT. Compared with those in the BT group, patients in the dMT group were less likely to experience symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91; =0.008) or any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61-0.84; <0.001). Conclusions In this meta-analysis of patients with acute ischemic stroke, we found no significant differences in 90-day functional outcome or mortality between dMT and BT, but a lower rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage for dMT. These findings support the use of dMT without intravenous thrombolysis bridging therapy. Registration URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: 42021234664.

摘要

背景

在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,静脉溶栓桥接机械取栓治疗与直接机械取栓治疗相比,是否能改善功能结局仍不确定。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较急性缺血性脑卒中患者接受直接机械取栓(dMT)与机械取栓桥接静脉溶栓(桥接治疗[BT])的结局。

方法和结果

我们在 2003 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 4 月 26 日期间,在 PubMed、Excerpta Medica 数据库和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库中进行了文献检索。我们纳入了报道急性缺血性脑卒中患者接受 dMT 与 BT 治疗后 90 天功能结局的随机临床试验和观察性研究。12 项纳入的研究(3 项随机对照试验和 9 项观察性研究)共纳入 3924 名患者(平均年龄 68.0 岁[标准差 13.1 岁];女性 44.2%;1887 名接受 dMT 治疗的患者和 2037 名接受 BT 治疗的患者)。随机对照试验和观察性数据的荟萃分析显示,接受 dMT 或 BT 治疗的患者 90 天功能独立性(比值比[OR],1.04;95%置信区间[CI],0.90-1.19)、死亡率(OR,1.03;95%CI,0.78-1.36)和成功再通率(OR,0.93;95%CI,0.76-1.14)相似。与 BT 组相比,dMT 组患者发生症状性颅内出血的可能性较小(OR,0.68;95%CI,0.51-0.91;=0.008)或任何颅内出血(OR,0.71;95%CI,0.61-0.84;<0.001)的可能性较小。

结论

在这项急性缺血性脑卒中患者的荟萃分析中,我们发现 dMT 与 BT 治疗在 90 天功能结局或死亡率方面无显著差异,但 dMT 的症状性颅内出血发生率较低。这些发现支持在不进行静脉溶栓桥接治疗的情况下使用 dMT。

注册网址

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/;独特标识符:42021234664。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/c923264cadf0/JAH3-10-e022303-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/6f7677753e29/JAH3-10-e022303-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/86fcd8f220c2/JAH3-10-e022303-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/ad15a9a1c7e3/JAH3-10-e022303-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/bd2bc6370cdf/JAH3-10-e022303-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/37617eb0ef25/JAH3-10-e022303-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/be97b9b94c81/JAH3-10-e022303-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/e946366675fc/JAH3-10-e022303-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/a8d30f88b117/JAH3-10-e022303-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/cb175c6f3928/JAH3-10-e022303-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/c923264cadf0/JAH3-10-e022303-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/6f7677753e29/JAH3-10-e022303-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/86fcd8f220c2/JAH3-10-e022303-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/ad15a9a1c7e3/JAH3-10-e022303-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/bd2bc6370cdf/JAH3-10-e022303-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/37617eb0ef25/JAH3-10-e022303-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/be97b9b94c81/JAH3-10-e022303-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/e946366675fc/JAH3-10-e022303-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/a8d30f88b117/JAH3-10-e022303-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/cb175c6f3928/JAH3-10-e022303-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/184e/9075352/c923264cadf0/JAH3-10-e022303-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Intravenous Thrombolysis Before Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis.急性缺血性脑卒中机械取栓前静脉溶栓治疗的 Meta 分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 7;10(23):e022303. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022303. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
Intravenous thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy in large vessel occlusions.血管内溶栓联合机械取栓治疗大动脉闭塞。
Ann Neurol. 2019 Sep;86(3):395-406. doi: 10.1002/ana.25544. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
Intravenous thrombolysis prior to endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis.血管内治疗前静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的Meta 分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Oct;43(10):5993-6002. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06233-2. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
4
Meta-analysis of direct endovascular thrombectomy vs bridging therapy in the management of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion.直接血管内血栓切除术与桥接治疗急性大血管闭塞性缺血性卒中的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;236:108070. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108070. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
5
Atrial Fibrillation and Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Adjusted Effect Estimates.经调整效应估计的急性缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术与心房颤动及临床结局的荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 19;12(24):e031733. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.031733. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
6
Endovascular thrombectomy with versus without intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急性基底动脉闭塞患者血管内血栓切除术与静脉溶栓治疗的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2024 Jun;271(6):3039-3049. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12353-w. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
7
Mechanical thrombectomy with or without thrombolysis: A meta-analysis of RCTs.机械血栓切除术联合与不联合溶栓治疗:一项 RCT 的荟萃分析。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2021 May;143(5):554-557. doi: 10.1111/ane.13390. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
8
Direct mechanical thrombectomy without intravenous thrombolysis versus bridging therapy for acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.直接机械取栓与静脉溶栓桥接治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的Meta 分析:随机对照试验研究。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Aug;16(6):621-631. doi: 10.1177/17474930211021353. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy Without vs With Intravenous Thrombolysis on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SKIP Randomized Clinical Trial.机械取栓与静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:SKIP 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):244-253. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23522.
10
[The role of intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in the treatment of large vessel occlusion strokes].[静脉溶栓在机械取栓治疗大血管闭塞性卒中前的作用]
Ideggyogy Sz. 2022 Jan 30;75(1-02):23-29. doi: 10.18071/isz.75.0023.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of bridging intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机械取栓术前桥接静脉溶栓的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Sep 3:15910199251368728. doi: 10.1177/15910199251368728.
2
Comparison of thrombectomy alone versus bridging thrombolysis in a US population using regression discontinuity analysis.在美国人群中使用回归断点分析比较单纯血栓切除术与桥接溶栓治疗。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 28;15(1):18757. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03249-4.
3
Predictive value of monocyte-to-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio (MHR) for poor prognosis after intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Tirofiban Combined With Intravenous Thrombolysis and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Matched-Control Analysis From a Nationwide Registry.低剂量替罗非班联合静脉溶栓及机械取栓治疗急性缺血性卒中的安全性和有效性:一项来自全国性登记研究的匹配对照分析
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 10;12:666919. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.666919. eCollection 2021.
2
Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Matched-Control Study.取栓与溶栓联合取栓治疗急性脑卒中患者的效果比较:一项病例对照研究。
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1589-1600. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031599. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
3
单核细胞与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值(MHR)对急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗后预后不良的预测价值
Arch Med Sci. 2024 May 28;20(6):1809-1821. doi: 10.5114/aoms/178013. eCollection 2024.
4
Risk of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.随机临床试验中机械取栓术后有症状颅内出血的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):63. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010063.
5
Outcomes and Complications Associated with Mechanical Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke.急性缺血性卒中治疗中机械取栓术的相关结局与并发症
Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2024;8(6):504-514. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
6
Bridging the Gap: Improving Acute Ischemic Stroke Outcomes with Intravenous Thrombolysis Prior to Mechanical Thrombectomy.弥合差距:在机械取栓术前通过静脉溶栓改善急性缺血性卒中的预后。
Neurol Int. 2024 Oct 22;16(6):1189-1202. doi: 10.3390/neurolint16060090.
7
Venous thrombolysis prior to mechanical thrombectomy reduces glycocalyx damage in patients with acute ischemic stroke.在进行机械取栓术之前进行静脉溶栓可减少急性缺血性中风患者的糖萼损伤。
Front Neurol. 2024 Aug 21;15:1321909. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1321909. eCollection 2024.
8
What You Always Wanted to Know about Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke but Never Dared to Ask: A Comprehensive Review.你一直想了解但却不敢问的关于急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的知识:一项综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 11;23(10):340. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310340. eCollection 2022 Oct.
9
Risk of Hemorrhagic Transformation after Mechanical Thrombectomy without versus with IV Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.机械取栓与静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中后出血性转化风险的比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Sep 9;45(9):1246-1252. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8307.
10
RE-OPEN: Randomised trial of biosimilar TNK versus TPA during endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions.重新开放:在因大血管闭塞导致的急性缺血性中风血管内治疗期间,生物类似药替奈普酶(TNK)与组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(TPA)的随机试验
BMJ Neurol Open. 2024 Mar 15;6(1):e000531. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2023-000531. eCollection 2024.
Current Status of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large Vessel Occlusion in China: A Real-World Nationwide Registry.
中国急性大血管闭塞血管内治疗的现状:一项真实世界的全国登记研究。
Stroke. 2021 Apr;52(4):1203-1212. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031869. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Effect of Endovascular Treatment Alone vs Intravenous Alteplase Plus Endovascular Treatment on Functional Independence in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The DEVT Randomized Clinical Trial.单纯血管内治疗与静脉溶栓联合血管内治疗对急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能独立性的影响:DEVT 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):234-243. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23523.
5
Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy Without vs With Intravenous Thrombolysis on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SKIP Randomized Clinical Trial.机械取栓与静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:SKIP 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):244-253. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23522.
6
In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting.在优化的三级卒中中心环境中,院内静脉溶栓治疗对机械取栓无益。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):580-586. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02727-8. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
7
Bridging Thrombolysis Achieved Better Outcomes Than Direct Thrombectomy After Large Vessel Occlusion: An Updated Meta-Analysis.大血管闭塞后桥接溶栓比直接取栓效果更好:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):356-365. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031477. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Intravenous Thrombolysis before Thrombectomy may Increase the Incidence of Intracranial Hemorrhage inTreating Carotid T Occlusion.血管内溶栓治疗在前可能会增加颈动脉闭塞取栓治疗的颅内出血发生率。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Feb;30(2):105473. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105473. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Functional and radiological outcomes after bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy in stroke patients with unknown onset: Bridging therapy versus direct thrombectomy in unknown onset stroke patients with 10-point ASPECTS.桥接治疗与直接取栓治疗对发病时间不明的脑卒中患者的功能和影像学结局:10 分 ASPECTS 评分的发病时间不明脑卒中患者的桥接治疗与直接取栓治疗比较。
Eur J Neurol. 2021 Jan;28(1):209-219. doi: 10.1111/ene.14529. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
10
Endovascular Thrombectomy with or without Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Stroke.血管内血栓切除术联合或不联合静脉内阿替普酶治疗急性脑卒中。
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 21;382(21):1981-1993. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001123. Epub 2020 May 6.