• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机临床试验中机械取栓术后有症状颅内出血的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Risk of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Reda Abdullah, Hasanzadeh Alireza, Ghozy Sherief, Sanjari Moghaddam Hossein, Adl Parvar Tanin, Motevaselian Mohsen, Kadirvel Ramanathan, Kallmes David F, Rabinstein Alejandro

机构信息

Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):63. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010063.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci15010063
PMID:39851431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11764228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is the most dreaded complication after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to estimate and compare risks of sICH after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) depending on the location of the large vessel occlusion, concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis, timing of treatment, and core size.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were included, following a comprehensive search of different databases from inception to 1 March 2024. Random-effect models in a meta-analysis were employed to obtain the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for sICH with MT, and were then compared to other reperfusion treatment regimens, including best medical treatment and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT).

RESULTS

MT in the anterior circulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH as compared with no-MT (RR: 1.46; 95%CI: 1.03-2.07; = 0.037). The risk of sICH was comparable between the MT and MT+IVT groups (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.57-1.03; 0.079). There was no difference in sICH risk with MT as compared with no-MT within 6 h of last known well (RR: 1.14; 95%CI: 0.78-1.66; = 0.485) and beyond that time (RR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.80-2.08; = 0.252); the risk of sICH was also comparable between MT conducted within 6 h of last known well and MT conducted beyond that time ( = 0.512). The sICH risk for MT in the posterior circulation (RR: 7.48; 95%CI: 2.27-24.61) was significantly higher than for MT in the anterior circulation (RR: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.90-1.56) ( = 0.003). MT was also associated with a significantly higher sICH risk than no-MT among patients with large core strokes (RR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.09-2.66, = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

When evaluating cumulative evidence from randomized controlled trials, the risk of sICH is increased after MT compared with patients not treated with MT. Yet, the difference is largely driven by the greater risk of sICH in patients treated with MT for posterior circulation occlusions and, to a lesser degree, large core strokes. Concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis and the use of MT in the extended therapeutic window do not raise the risk of sICH.

摘要

背景

症状性颅内出血(sICH)是急性缺血性卒中再灌注治疗后最可怕的并发症。我们进行了一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析,以评估和比较机械取栓(MT)后sICH的风险,该风险取决于大血管闭塞的位置、静脉溶栓的联合使用、治疗时机和梗死核心大小。

方法

纳入自数据库建立至2024年3月1日全面检索不同数据库后的随机对照试验。荟萃分析中采用随机效应模型来获得MT治疗sICH的合并风险比(RRs)及其相应的95%置信区间(95%CI),然后与其他再灌注治疗方案进行比较,包括最佳药物治疗和静脉溶栓(IVT)。

结果

与未进行MT相比,前循环MT发生sICH的风险显著更高(RR:1.46;95%CI:1.03 - 2.07;P = 0.037)。MT组和MT + IVT组之间sICH的风险相当(RR:0.77;95%CI:0.57 - 1.03;P = 0.079)。与最后一次已知状态良好后6小时内未进行MT相比,MT发生sICH的风险无差异(RR:1.14;95%CI:0.78 - 1.66;P = 0.485),6小时以后也是如此(RR:1.29;95%CI:0.80 - 2.08;P = 0.252);最后一次已知状态良好后6小时内进行的MT与6小时以后进行的MT之间sICH的风险也相当(P = 0.512)。后循环MT发生sICH的风险(RR:7.48;95%CI:2.27 - 24.61)显著高于前循环MT(RR:1.18;95%CI:0.90 - 1.56)(P = 0.003)。在梗死核心大的患者中,MT发生sICH的风险也显著高于未进行MT的患者(RR:1.71;95%CI:1.09 - 2.66,P = 0.018)。

结论

在评估随机对照试验的累积证据时,与未接受MT治疗的患者相比,MT后sICH的风险增加。然而,这种差异在很大程度上是由后循环闭塞接受MT治疗的患者中sICH风险更高以及梗死核心大的患者中sICH风险稍高所驱动的。静脉溶栓的联合使用以及在延长治疗窗内使用MT不会增加sICH的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/32e985c2194d/brainsci-15-00063-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/3381c35b26de/brainsci-15-00063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/a5afc448cdbd/brainsci-15-00063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/4f67d5b1b612/brainsci-15-00063-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/411a4575d226/brainsci-15-00063-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/2ed1416715b3/brainsci-15-00063-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/32e985c2194d/brainsci-15-00063-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/3381c35b26de/brainsci-15-00063-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/a5afc448cdbd/brainsci-15-00063-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/4f67d5b1b612/brainsci-15-00063-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/411a4575d226/brainsci-15-00063-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/2ed1416715b3/brainsci-15-00063-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ce2b/11764228/32e985c2194d/brainsci-15-00063-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.随机临床试验中机械取栓术后有症状颅内出血的风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Brain Sci. 2025 Jan 11;15(1):63. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15010063.
2
Comparison of Risk Factors, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Posterior vs. Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion.后循环与前循环大血管闭塞机械取栓的危险因素、安全性及疗效结果比较
Front Neurol. 2021 Jun 22;12:687134. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.687134. eCollection 2021.
3
Mechanical thrombectomy alone versus with thrombolysis for ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.单纯机械取栓与联合溶栓治疗缺血性卒中:随机试验的荟萃分析
Interv Neuroradiol. 2023 Feb 3:15910199231154331. doi: 10.1177/15910199231154331.
4
Intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion; should we cross that bridge? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 36,123 patients.血管内溶栓桥接机械取栓治疗大动脉闭塞性急性缺血性脑卒中;我们是否应该跨越那座桥?一项纳入 36123 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov;43(11):6243-6269. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06283-6. Epub 2022 Jul 23.
5
Bridging May Increase the Risk of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Thrombectomy Patients With Low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score.低 Alberta 卒中项目早期计算机断层扫描评分的取栓患者中,桥接治疗可能增加症状性颅内出血的风险。
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):1098-1104. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030508. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy versus mechanical thrombectomy alone for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and updated meta-analysis of clinical trials.静脉溶栓联合机械取栓与单纯机械取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中的系统评价和临床试验更新荟萃分析。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2024 Aug;30(4):550-563. doi: 10.1177/15910199221140276. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
7
Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions.机械取栓与联合取栓和静脉溶栓治疗串联病变的安全性结局。
Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2522-2533. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.042966. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
8
Influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis on outcome after failed mechanical thrombectomy: ETIS registry analysis.静脉溶栓治疗对机械取栓失败后结局的影响:ETIS 注册研究分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):688-692. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017867. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with pre-intravenous thrombolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机械取栓联合静脉溶栓治疗的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurol. 2021 Jul;268(7):2420-2428. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-09778-4. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
10
Bridging thrombolysis improves survival rates at 90 days compared with direct mechanical thrombectomy alone in acute ischemic stroke due to basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1096 patients.与单纯直接机械取栓术相比,桥接溶栓可提高基底动脉闭塞所致急性缺血性卒中患者90天的生存率:一项对1096例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Oct;15(10):1039-1045. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019510. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comment on "Symptoms, Imaging Features, Treatment Decisions, and Outcomes of Patients with Top of the Basilar Artery Syndrome: Experiences from a Comprehensive Stroke Center".对《基底动脉尖综合征患者的症状、影像学特征、治疗决策及预后:来自一家综合性卒中中心的经验》的评论
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Jun;42(3):1126-1127. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02264-7. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Global burden of stroke: dynamic estimates to inform action.全球卒中负担:为行动提供信息的动态评估
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Oct;23(10):952-953. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00363-6.
2
Global burden of stroke attributable to high systolic blood pressure in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019.1990 - 2019年204个国家和地区中因收缩压升高导致的全球卒中负担
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Apr 26;11:1339910. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1339910. eCollection 2024.
3
Trial of Thrombectomy for Stroke with a Large Infarct of Unrestricted Size.
急性大血管闭塞性卒中血管内治疗随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2024 May 9;390(18):1677-1689. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314063.
4
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke from 1990 to 2019: A temporal trend analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.全球、区域和国家 1990 年至 2019 年卒中负担变化趋势分析:基于 2019 年全球疾病负担研究
Int J Stroke. 2024 Jul;19(6):686-694. doi: 10.1177/17474930241246955. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
5
Endovascular Thrombectomy With or Without Thrombolysis for Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.血管内血栓切除术联合或不联合溶栓治疗中风:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurohospitalist. 2024 Jan;14(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/19418744231200046. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
6
Real-world safety and efficacy endovascular treatment versus standard medical treatment for basilar artery occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.真实世界中基底动脉闭塞的血管内治疗与标准药物治疗的安全性和有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Jan;236:108096. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108096. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
7
Endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke with established large infarct: multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.急性缺血性脑卒中伴大梗死的血管内血栓切除术: 多中心、开放标签、随机试验。
Lancet. 2023 Nov 11;402(10414):1753-1763. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02032-9. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
8
A meta-analysis and systematic review of endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management for acute basilar artery occlusion.急性基底动脉闭塞血管内血栓切除术与药物治疗的荟萃分析和系统评价。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Nov;234:107986. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107986. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
9
Effect of endovascular therapy in large anterior circulation ischaemic strokes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.血管内治疗对大动脉环前部缺血性卒中的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Dec;8(4):932-941. doi: 10.1177/23969873231196381. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
10
Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials.静脉溶栓在大血管前循环卒中血管内治疗中的价值:六项随机试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Lancet. 2023 Sep 16;402(10406):965-974. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01142-X. Epub 2023 Aug 25.