Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, China.
Department of Emergency, Fuyang People's Hospital, Fuyang, 236000, China.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 May;53(4):898-910. doi: 10.1007/s11239-021-02584-3. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
To review the literature for randomized control trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies investigating the safety and efficacy of tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched for available papers published up to September 2021. The efficacy was evaluated based on the 3-month favorable outcome [modified Rankin scale (mRS) = 0-1], functional outcome (mRS = 0-2), and the last available National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score measured in each study. Twelve studies (two RCTs and 10 prospective cohorts) and 2926 patients were included. Treatment with tirofiban or eptifibatide had no effects on the favorable outcome (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.89-1.35, P = 0.411), functional outcome (RR = 1.12, 95% CI 0.98-1.28, P = 0.010), and last available NIHSS (WMD = - 2.32, 95% CI - 5.14 to 0.50, P = 0.106), but might increase mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.71-0.99, P = 0.121). The sensitivity analyses showed that the meta-analyses were robust. There was no significant publication bias. Tirofiban did not increase the risk of ICH (P = 0. 423) and sICH (P = 0. 990) but increased the risk of fatal ICH (RR = 3.59, 95% CI 1.62-7.96, P = 0.002). Thrombolysis/thrombectomy did not influence any of the outcomes. Adding tirofiban or eptifibatide to thrombolysis/thrombectomy was not significantly associated with a favorable outcome (mRS = 0-1) nor functional outcome (mRS = 0-2) in patients with AIS at 3 months, but might be associated with mortality, possibly due to fatal ICH. The NIHSS was also not significantly different between the intervention and control groups after treatments.
检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以获取截至 2021 年 9 月发表的关于研究替罗非班和依替巴肽在急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者中的安全性和有效性的随机对照试验(RCT)和前瞻性队列研究的可用文献。根据 3 个月时的良好结局[改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)= 0-1]、功能结局(mRS=0-2)和每个研究中最后一次可用的国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分来评估疗效。纳入 12 项研究(2 项 RCT 和 10 项前瞻性队列研究)和 2926 例患者。替罗非班或依替巴肽治疗对良好结局(RR=1.09,95%CI 0.89-1.35,P=0.411)、功能结局(RR=1.12,95%CI 0.98-1.28,P=0.010)和最后一次可用 NIHSS(WMD=-2.32,95%CI-5.14 至 0.50,P=0.106)均无影响,但可能增加死亡率(RR=0.84,95%CI 0.71-0.99,P=0.121)。敏感性分析表明,荟萃分析结果稳健。无明显发表偏倚。替罗非班并未增加 ICH(P=0.423)和 sICH(P=0.990)的风险,但增加了致命性 ICH 的风险(RR=3.59,95%CI 1.62-7.96,P=0.002)。溶栓/取栓治疗不影响任何结局。替罗非班或依替巴肽联合溶栓/取栓治疗与 AIS 患者 3 个月时的良好结局(mRS=0-1)和功能结局(mRS=0-2)均无显著相关性,但可能与死亡率相关,可能与致命性 ICH 有关。治疗后,干预组和对照组的 NIHSS 也无显著差异。