Centre for Tuberculosis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Centre for Tuberculosis, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;22(4):496-506. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00470-9. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
BACKGROUND: Bedaquiline improves outcomes of patients with rifampicin-resistant and multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis; however, emerging resistance threatens this success. We did a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis evaluating the epidemiology, genetic basis, and treatment outcomes associated with bedaquiline resistance, using data from South Africa (2015-19). METHODS: Patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis starting bedaquiline-based treatment had surveillance samples submitted at baseline, month 2, and month 6, along with demographic information. Culture-positive baseline and post-baseline isolates had phenotypic resistance determined. Eligible patients were aged 12 years or older with a positive culture sample at baseline or, if the sample was invalid or negative, a sample within 30 days of the baseline sample submitted for bedaquiline drug susceptibility testing. For the longitudinal study, the first surveillance sample had to be phenotypically susceptible to bedaquiline for inclusion. Whole-genome sequencing was done on bedaquiline-resistant isolates and a subset of bedaquiline-susceptible isolates. The National Institute for Communicable Diseases tuberculosis reference laboratory, and national tuberculosis surveillance databases were matched to the Electronic Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Register. We assessed baseline resistance prevalence, mutations, transmission, cumulative resistance incidence, and odds ratios (ORs) associating risk factors for resistance with patient outcomes. FINDINGS: Between Jan 1, 2015, and July 31, 2019, 8041 patients had surveillance samples submitted, of whom 2023 were included in the cross-sectional analysis and 695 in the longitudinal analysis. Baseline bedaquiline resistance prevalence was 3·8% (76 of 2023 patients; 95% CI 2·9-4·6), and it was associated with previous exposure to bedaquiline or clofazimine (OR 7·1, 95% CI 2·3-21·9) and with rifampicin-resistant or MDR tuberculosis with additional resistance to either fluoroquinolones or injectable drugs (pre-extensively-drug resistant [XDR] tuberculosis: 4·2, 1·7-10·5) or to both (XDR tuberculosis: 4·8, 2·0-11·7). Rv0678 mutations were the sole genetic basis of phenotypic resistance. Baseline resistance could be attributed to previous bedaquiline or clofazimine exposure in four (5·3%) of 76 patients and to primary transmission in six (7·9%). Odds of successful treatment outcomes were lower in patients with baseline bedaquiline resistance (0·5, 0·3-1). Resistance during treatment developed in 16 (2·3%) of 695 patients, at a median of 90 days (IQR 62-195), with 12 of these 16 having pre-XDR or XDR. INTERPRETATION: Bedaquiline resistance was associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Rapid assessment of bedaquiline resistance, especially when patients were previously exposed to bedaquiline or clofazimine, should be prioritised at baseline or if patients remain culture-positive after 2 months of treatment. Preventing resistance by use of novel combination therapies, current treatment optimisation, and patient support is essential. FUNDING: National Institute for Communicable Diseases of South Africa.
背景:贝达喹啉可改善利福平耐药和耐多药(MDR)结核病患者的治疗效果;然而,新出现的耐药性威胁着这一成果。我们通过南非(2015-19 年)的数据进行了一项横断面和纵向分析,评估了与贝达喹啉耐药相关的流行病学、遗传基础和治疗结局。
方法:开始接受贝达喹啉为基础的治疗的耐药结核病患者在基线、第 2 个月和第 6 个月提交了监测样本,同时还提供了人口统计学信息。对培养阳性的基线和基线后分离物进行表型耐药性测定。合格的患者年龄在 12 岁及以上,基线时培养阳性样本,或者如果样本无效或为阴性,则在基线样本提交用于贝达喹啉药物敏感性检测后的 30 天内提交样本。对于纵向研究,第一个监测样本必须对贝达喹啉表现出表型敏感性才能纳入。对贝达喹啉耐药分离株和贝达喹啉敏感分离株的一部分进行全基因组测序。国家传染病研究所结核病参考实验室和国家结核病监测数据库与电子耐药结核病登记处相匹配。我们评估了基线耐药率、突变、传播、累积耐药发生率以及与耐药相关的风险因素与患者结局的比值比(OR)。
结果:2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日,有 8041 名患者提交了监测样本,其中 2023 名患者纳入了横断面分析,695 名患者纳入了纵向分析。基线时贝达喹啉耐药率为 3.8%(2023 名患者中的 76 名;95%CI2.9-4.6),与之前使用过贝达喹啉或氯法齐明(OR7.1,95%CI2.3-21.9)以及耐利福平或 MDR 结核病且对氟喹诺酮类药物或注射类药物有额外耐药性(预广泛耐药结核病:4.2,1.7-10.5)或两者均耐药(广泛耐药结核病:4.8,2.0-11.7)相关。Rv0678 突变是表型耐药的唯一遗传基础。在 76 名耐药患者中,有 4 名(5.3%)和 6 名(7.9%)患者的基线耐药可归因于之前使用过贝达喹啉或氯法齐明和原发性传播。在基线耐药的患者中,成功治疗结局的可能性较低(0.5,0.3-1)。在 695 名患者中,有 16 名(2.3%)在治疗期间出现耐药,中位时间为 90 天(IQR62-195),其中 12 名患者患有预广泛耐药或广泛耐药结核病。
解释:贝达喹啉耐药与较差的治疗结局相关。应优先在基线时快速评估贝达喹啉耐药性,特别是当患者之前曾接触过贝达喹啉或氯法齐明时,或者如果患者在 2 个月的治疗后仍培养阳性。通过使用新的联合疗法、当前的治疗优化和患者支持来预防耐药性至关重要。
资金来源:南非国家传染病研究所。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017-5-24
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025-7-15
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025-8-6
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025-4-22
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025-5-7