Ardizzoni E, Mulders W, De Diego Fuertes M, Hayrapetyan A, Mirzoyan A, Faqirzai J, Khachatryan N, Oganezova I, Varaine F, Bastard M, Graulus P, Meehan C J, Rigouts L, de Jong B C, Decroo T, Hewison C, Van Rie A
Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Médecins Sans Frontières, Paris, France.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 May 7;69(5):e0183924. doi: 10.1128/aac.01839-24. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
Risk factors for baseline bedaquiline (BDQ) resistance, amplification during treatment, and correlations with treatment outcomes are not fully understood. This cohort included Armenian patients with multidrug-resistant TB predominantly fluoroquinolone-resistant enrolled between 2013 and 2015 in a BDQ compassionate use program. BDQ resistance at baseline and during treatment was assessed using MGIT (pDST), minimal inhibitory concentration in 7H11 (MIC), and whole-genome sequencing. Risk factors, such as treatment effectiveness or stage of the disease, were analyzed for association with baseline BDQ resistance, acquired BDQ resistance, and treatment outcome. Among 39 patients, baseline BDQ resistance was 6% (2/33) by pDST and 7% (2/29) by MIC. All four baseline isolates with an mutation were phenotypically resistant. During treatment, 48% of the patients acquired BDQ resistance by pDST, and 52% acquired mutations at various frequencies (97% in ). None of the factors significantly contributed to baseline or acquired BDQ resistance. Unfavorable treatment outcome (41%) was more frequent in the presence of acquired mutations [odds ratio (OR) 132, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.43, 2375], phenotypic BDQ resistance (OR 176, 95% CI 6.48, 2423), or MIC increase above or below the critical concentration (both OR 84.3, 95% CI 2.93, 2423) during treatment. For these highly treatment-experienced patients, low baseline prevalence but high incidence of acquired BDQ resistance was observed. Acquisition of mutations in BDQ candidate resistance genes, regardless of their frequency, or increased MICs during treatment, even below the critical concentration, should be seen as a warning sign of resistance amplification and increased risk of unfavorable treatment outcome.
基线期贝达喹啉(BDQ)耐药、治疗期间扩增的危险因素以及与治疗结果的相关性尚未完全明确。该队列纳入了2013年至2015年间在一项BDQ同情用药项目中登记的主要对氟喹诺酮耐药的亚美尼亚耐多药结核病患者。使用分枝杆菌生长指示管(pDST)、7H11中的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)以及全基因组测序评估基线期和治疗期间的BDQ耐药情况。分析治疗有效性或疾病阶段等危险因素与基线期BDQ耐药、获得性BDQ耐药及治疗结果之间的关联。在39例患者中,通过pDST检测的基线期BDQ耐药率为6%(2/33),通过MIC检测为7%(2/29)。所有4株具有 突变的基线期分离株表型耐药。治疗期间,48%的患者通过pDST获得BDQ耐药,52%的患者出现不同频率的突变( 中为97%)。没有任何因素对基线期或获得性BDQ耐药有显著影响。在治疗期间出现获得性 突变[比值比(OR)132,95%置信区间(CI)7.43,2375]、表型BDQ耐药(OR 176,95%CI 6.48,2423)或MIC高于或低于临界浓度增加(两者OR均为84.3,9 CI 2.93,2423)时,不良治疗结果(41%)更为常见。对于这些有丰富治疗经验的患者,观察到基线期患病率低但获得性BDQ耐药发生率高。无论频率如何,BDQ候选耐药基因中出现突变,或治疗期间MIC升高,即使低于临界浓度,都应被视为耐药扩增的警示信号以及不良治疗结果风险增加的标志。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025-5-7
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024-12-5
Microbiol Spectr. 2025-7
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025-8-6
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022-6-1
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021-10-18
N Engl J Med. 2020-3-5