Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
National Centre for Healthy Aging, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Apr;76(4):341-349. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-217010. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
Melbourne, Australia, successfully halted exponential transmission of COVID-19 via two strict lockdowns during 2020. The impact of such restrictions on healthcare-seeking behaviour is not comprehensively understood, but is of global importance. We explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute, subacute and emergency department (ED) presentations/admissions within a tertiary, metropolitan health service in Melbourne, Australia, over two waves of community transmission (1 March to 20 September 2020).
We used 4 years of historical data and novel forecasting methods to predict counterfactual hospital activity for 2020, assuming absence of COVID-19. Observed activity was compared with forecasts overall, by age, triage category and for myocardial infarction and stroke. Data were analysed for all patients residing in the health service catchment area presenting between 4 January 2016 and 20 September 2020.
ED presentations (n=401 805), acute admissions (n=371 723) and subacute admissions (n=15 676) were analysed. Substantial departures from forecasted presentation levels were observed during both waves in the ED and acute settings, and during the second wave in subacute. Reductions were most marked among those aged >80 and <18 years. Presentations persisted at expected levels for urgent conditions, and ED triage categories 1 and 5, with clear reductions in categories 2-4.
Our analyses suggest citizens were willing and able to present with life-threatening conditions during Melbourne's lockdowns, and that switching to telemedicine did not cause widespread spill-over from primary care into ED. During a pandemic, lockdowns may not inhibit appropriate hospital attendance where rates of infectious disease are low.
澳大利亚墨尔本在 2020 年通过两次严格的封锁成功阻止了 COVID-19 的指数传播。这种限制对医疗保健寻求行为的影响尚未得到全面了解,但具有全球重要性。我们研究了 COVID-19 大流行对澳大利亚墨尔本一家三级大都市卫生服务机构的急性、亚急性和急诊部(ED)就诊/入院的影响,涉及两次社区传播(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 9 月 20 日)。
我们使用了 4 年的历史数据和新的预测方法来预测 2020 年假设没有 COVID-19 情况下的医院活动。整体上比较了观察到的活动与预测活动,按年龄、分诊类别以及心肌梗死和中风进行比较。分析了 2016 年 1 月 4 日至 2020 年 9 月 20 日期间居住在该卫生服务区域内的所有患者的数据。
分析了 ED 就诊(n=401805)、急性入院(n=371723)和亚急性入院(n=15676)。在 ED 和急性治疗环境中,两次波次都观察到与预测就诊水平有很大差异,而在亚急性治疗中,第二次波次差异更大。80 岁以上和 18 岁以下人群的就诊人数减少最为明显。紧急情况和 ED 分诊类别 1 和 5 的就诊人数仍保持在预期水平,而类别 2-4 的就诊人数明显减少。
我们的分析表明,在墨尔本封锁期间,公民愿意并能够出现危及生命的情况就诊,而且转向远程医疗并没有导致从初级保健到 ED 的广泛溢出。在传染病率低的情况下,封锁可能不会阻止人们在大流行期间适当就医。