• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理学龄前喘息的血嗜酸性粒细胞:来自概念验证试验的经验教训。

Blood eosinophils in managing preschool wheeze: Lessons learnt from a proof-of-concept trial.

机构信息

National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Respiratory Paediatrics, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e13697. doi: 10.1111/pai.13697. Epub 2021 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1111/pai.13697
PMID:34783100
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Management of preschool wheeze is based predominantly on symptom patterns.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether personalizing therapy using blood eosinophils or airway bacterial infection results in fewer attacks compared with standard care.

METHODS

A proof-of-concept, randomized trial to investigate whether the prescription of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) guided by blood eosinophils, or targeted antibiotics for airway bacterial infection, results in fewer unscheduled healthcare visits (UHCVs) compared with standard care. Children aged 1-5 years with ≥2 wheeze attacks in the previous year were categorized as episodic viral wheeze (EVW) or multiple trigger wheeze (MTW). The intervention group was prescribed ICS if blood eosinophils ≥3%, or targeted antibiotics if there is positive culture on induced sputum/cough swab. The control group received standard care. The primary outcome was UHCV at 4 months.

RESULTS

60 children, with a median age of 36.5 (range 14-61) months, were randomized. Median blood eosinophils were 5.2 (range 0-21)%, 27 of 60 (45%) children were atopic, and 8 of 60 (13%) had airway bacterial infection. There was no relationship between EVW, MTW and either blood eosinophils, atopic status or infection. 67% in each group were prescribed ICS. 15 of 30 control subjects and 16 of 30 patients in the intervention group had UHCV over 4 months (p = .8). The time to first UHCV was similar. 50% returned adherence monitors; in those, median ICS adherence was 67%. There were no differences in any parameter between those who did and did not have an UHCV.

CONCLUSION

Clinical phenotype was unrelated to allergen sensitization or blood eosinophils. ICS treatment determined by blood eosinophils did not impact UHCV, but ICS adherence was poor.

摘要

背景

学龄前喘息的管理主要基于症状模式。

目的

确定使用血液嗜酸性粒细胞或气道细菌感染进行个体化治疗是否比标准护理导致更少的发作。

方法

一项概念验证、随机试验,旨在调查血液嗜酸性粒细胞指导下吸入皮质激素(ICS)或靶向抗生素治疗气道细菌感染是否比标准护理导致更少的非计划性医疗就诊(UHCV)。年龄在 1-5 岁、前一年有≥2 次喘息发作的儿童分为发作性病毒性喘息(EVW)或多种触发喘息(MTW)。如果血液嗜酸性粒细胞≥3%,干预组开具 ICS,如果诱导痰/咳嗽拭子培养阳性,则开具靶向抗生素。对照组接受标准护理。主要结局为 4 个月时 UHCV。

结果

共 60 例儿童随机分组,中位年龄 36.5(14-61)个月。中位血嗜酸性粒细胞为 5.2(0-21)%,60 例儿童中有 27 例(45%)为特应性,60 例中有 8 例(13%)有气道细菌感染。EVW、MTW 与血嗜酸性粒细胞、特应性状态或感染均无关系。每组各有 67%的患儿开具 ICS。对照组和干预组各有 15 例和 16 例在 4 个月时有 UHCV(p=0.8)。首次 UHCV 的时间相似。50%的患儿返回了依从性监测器,其中 ICS 依从性中位数为 67%。在有或没有 UHCV 的患儿中,各参数均无差异。

结论

临床表型与过敏原致敏或血嗜酸性粒细胞无关。根据血嗜酸性粒细胞确定的 ICS 治疗并未影响 UHCV,但 ICS 依从性较差。

相似文献

1
Blood eosinophils in managing preschool wheeze: Lessons learnt from a proof-of-concept trial.管理学龄前喘息的血嗜酸性粒细胞:来自概念验证试验的经验教训。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jan;33(1):e13697. doi: 10.1111/pai.13697. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
2
Electronic adherence monitoring identifies severe preschool wheezers who are steroid responsive.电子依从性监测可识别出对类固醇有反应的严重学龄前喘息患儿。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020 Sep;55(9):2254-2260. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24943. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Stability and predictiveness of multiple trigger and episodic viral wheeze in preschoolers.学龄前儿童多重触发因素与发作性病毒性喘息的稳定性和预测性
Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Jun;46(6):837-47. doi: 10.1111/cea.12660.
4
Wheeze phenotypes in young children have different courses during the preschool period.幼儿喘息表型在学龄前期间具有不同的病程。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013 Oct;111(4):256-261.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.07.002. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
5
Recurrent Severe Preschool Wheeze: From Prespecified Diagnostic Labels to Underlying Endotypes.反复发作性严重学龄前喘息:从预设的诊断标签到潜在的表型分类。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Sep 1;204(5):523-535. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3696OC.
6
Preschool wheeze is not asthma: a clinical dilemma.学龄前喘息并非哮喘:一个临床难题。
Indian J Pediatr. 2014 Nov;81(11):1193-5. doi: 10.1007/s12098-014-1500-x. Epub 2014 Jun 13.
7
Episodic viral wheeze and multiple-trigger wheeze in preschool children are neither distinct nor constant patterns. A prospective multicenter cohort study in secondary care.学龄前儿童的间歇性病毒喘息和多重触发喘息既不是独特的也不是固定的模式。一项二级保健的前瞻性多中心队列研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1439-1446. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24411. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
8
Demystifying controversies in preschool wheeze.揭开学龄前喘息争议的神秘面纱。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2023 Jul-Dec;17(11):1023-1031. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2023.2283128. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
9
Temporal stability of multitrigger and episodic viral wheeze in early childhood.婴幼儿多重触发和偶发性病毒性喘息的时间稳定性。
Eur Respir J. 2017 Nov 2;50(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00014-2017. Print 2017 Nov.
10
Neutrophilic Steroid-Refractory Recurrent Wheeze and Eosinophilic Steroid-Refractory Asthma in Children.儿童中性粒细胞类固醇难治性复发性喘息和嗜酸性粒细胞类固醇难治性哮喘。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1351-1361.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Blood Eosinophils for Prediction of Exacerbation in Preschool Children With Recurrent Wheezing.血液嗜酸性粒细胞预测学龄前反复喘息儿童的恶化。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 May;11(5):1485-1493.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.037. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Exhaled Breath Analysis for Investigating the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids and Corticosteroid Responsiveness in Wheezing Preschool Children.呼出气体分析用于研究喘息学龄前儿童吸入性糖皮质激素的使用情况及糖皮质激素反应性
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 31;11(17):5160. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175160.
3
How to Choose the Correct Drug in Severe Pediatric Asthma.
如何在重度小儿哮喘中选择正确的药物
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 2;10:902168. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.902168. eCollection 2022.