Associate Cochrane Centre, Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):CD013757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013757.pub2.
Respiratory viruses are the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) and hospitalisation in infants and young children. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the main infectious agent in this population. Palivizumab is administered intramuscularly every month during five months in the first RSV season to prevent serious RSV LRTI in children. Given its high cost, it is essential to know if palivizumab continues to be effective in preventing severe RSV disease in children.
To assess the effects of palivizumab for preventing severe RSV infection in children.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, three other databases and two trials registers to 14 October 2021, together with reference checking, citation searching and contact with study authors to identify additional studies. We searched Embase to October 2020, as we did not have access to this database for 2021.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cluster-RCTs, comparing palivizumab given at a dose of 15 mg/kg once a month (maximum five doses) with placebo, no intervention or standard care in children 0 to 24 months of age from both genders, regardless of RSV infection history. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used Cochrane's Screen4Me workflow to help assess the search results. Two review authors screened studies for selection, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We used standard Cochrane methods. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. The primary outcomes were hospitalisation due to RSV infection, all-cause mortality and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness, length of hospital stay, RSV infection, number of wheezing days, days of supplemental oxygen, intensive care unit length of stay and mechanical ventilation days.
We included five studies with a total of 3343 participants. All studies were parallel RCTs, assessing the effects of 15 mg/kg of palivizumab every month up to five months compared to placebo or no intervention in an outpatient setting, although one study also included hospitalised infants. Most of the included studies were conducted in children with a high risk of RSV infection due to comorbidities like bronchopulmonary dysplasia and congenital heart disease. The risk of bias of outcomes across all studies was similar and predominately low. Palivizumab reduces hospitalisation due to RSV infection at two years' follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 0.64; 5 studies, 3343 participants; high certainty evidence). Based on 98 hospitalisations per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 43 (29 to 62) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in mortality at two years' follow-up (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.15; 5 studies, 3343 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Based on 23 deaths per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 16 (10 to 27) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in little to no difference in adverse events at 150 days' follow-up (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.39; 3 studies, 2831 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Based on 84 cases per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 91 (71 to 117) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab probably results in a slight reduction in hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness at two years' follow-up (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.97; 5 studies, 3343 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Palivizumab may result in a large reduction in RSV infection at two years' follow-up (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.55; 3 studies, 554 participants; low certainty evidence). Based on 195 cases of RSV infection per 1000 participants in the placebo group, this corresponds to 64 (39 to 107) per 1000 participants in the palivizumab group. Palivizumab also reduces the number of wheezing days at one year's follow-up (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.44; 1 study, 429 participants; high certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that prophylaxis with palivizumab reduces hospitalisation due to RSV infection and results in little to no difference in mortality or adverse events. Moreover, palivizumab results in a slight reduction in hospitalisation due to respiratory-related illness and may result in a large reduction in RSV infections. Palivizumab also reduces the number of wheezing days. These results may be applicable to children with a high risk of RSV infection due to comorbidities. Further research is needed to establish the effect of palivizumab on children with other comorbidities known as risk factors for severe RSV disease (e.g. immune deficiencies) and other social determinants of the disease, including children living in low- and middle-income countries, tropical regions, children lacking breastfeeding, living in poverty, or members of families in overcrowded situations.
呼吸道病毒是导致婴幼儿下呼吸道感染(LRTI)和住院的主要原因。呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)是该人群中的主要感染因子。帕利珠单抗每月肌肉注射一次,共五个月,用于预防婴幼儿 RSV 季节的严重 RSV LRTI。鉴于其高成本,必须了解帕利珠单抗是否继续有效预防儿童严重 RSV 疾病。
评估帕利珠单抗预防儿童严重 RSV 感染的效果。
我们检索了 CENTRAL、MEDLINE、另外三个数据库和两个试验注册处,截至 2021 年 10 月 14 日,并通过参考文献检查、引文搜索和与研究作者联系来确定其他研究。我们检索了 Embase 截至 2020 年,因为我们无法获取 2021 年的数据库。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs),包括整群 RCTs,比较了 15 mg/kg 剂量的帕利珠单抗每月一次(最多五剂)与安慰剂、无干预或标准护理在 0 至 24 个月龄的儿童,无论 RSV 感染史如何。
我们使用 Cochrane 的 Screen4Me 工作流程来帮助评估搜索结果。两名综述作者筛选研究以进行选择,评估偏倚风险并提取数据。我们使用了标准的 Cochrane 方法。我们使用 GRADE 来评估证据的确定性。主要结局是因 RSV 感染而住院、全因死亡率和不良事件。次要结局是因呼吸道相关疾病而住院、住院时间、RSV 感染、喘息天数、补充氧气天数、重症监护病房住院时间和机械通气天数。
我们纳入了五项研究,共 3343 名参与者。所有研究均为平行 RCT,评估了 15 mg/kg 帕利珠单抗每月一次,最多五个月,与安慰剂或无干预相比,在门诊环境下,尽管一项研究也包括住院婴儿。大多数纳入的研究是在患有支气管肺发育不良和先天性心脏病等 RSV 感染高风险的儿童中进行的。所有研究的结局偏倚风险相似,主要为低风险。帕利珠单抗可降低 RSV 感染导致的住院率在两年随访时(风险比(RR)0.44,95%置信区间(CI)0.30 至 0.64;5 项研究,3343 名参与者;高确定性证据)。根据安慰剂组每 1000 名参与者中有 98 例住院,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每 1000 名参与者中有 43 例(29 至 62 例)。帕利珠单抗可能在两年随访时对死亡率几乎没有差异(RR 0.69,95%CI 0.42 至 1.15;5 项研究,3343 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。根据安慰剂组每 1000 名参与者中有 23 例死亡,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每 1000 名参与者中有 16 例(10 至 27 例)。帕利珠单抗可能在 150 天随访时对不良事件几乎没有差异(RR 1.09,95%CI 0.85 至 1.39;3 项研究,2831 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。根据安慰剂组每 1000 名参与者中有 84 例不良事件,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每 1000 名参与者中有 91 例(71 至 117 例)。帕利珠单抗可能会降低因呼吸道相关疾病而住院的发生率在两年随访时(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.62 至 0.97;5 项研究,3343 名参与者;中等确定性证据)。帕利珠单抗可能会显著降低 RSV 感染率在两年随访时(RR 0.33,95%CI 0.20 至 0.55;3 项研究,554 名参与者;低确定性证据)。根据安慰剂组每 1000 名参与者中有 195 例 RSV 感染,这相当于帕利珠单抗组每 1000 名参与者中有 64 例(39 至 107 例)。帕利珠单抗还可减少一年随访时的喘息天数(RR 0.39,95%CI 0.35 至 0.44;1 项研究,429 名参与者;高确定性证据)。
现有证据表明,帕利珠单抗预防可降低 RSV 感染导致的住院率,且死亡率或不良事件几乎没有差异。此外,帕利珠单抗可降低因呼吸道相关疾病导致的住院率,且 RSV 感染率可能大幅降低。帕利珠单抗还可减少喘息天数。这些结果可能适用于因合并症而存在 RSV 感染高风险的儿童。需要进一步研究来确定帕利珠单抗对因合并症而有发生严重 RSV 疾病风险的儿童(例如免疫缺陷)和其他社会决定因素(例如居住在低收入和中等收入国家、热带地区、缺乏母乳喂养、生活贫困、或处于拥挤环境中的家庭)的效果。