Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Preventive Cardiology and Preventive Medicine, Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
J Thromb Haemost. 2022 Mar;20(3):705-715. doi: 10.1111/jth.15595. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
The role of platelets in the pathogenesis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is receiving increasing attention; however, limited information is available on platelet function in the acute phase of the disease.
To characterize platelet function according to VTE phenotypes.
PATIENTS/METHODS: In total, 154 subjects (isolated pulmonary embolism [iPE], n = 28; isolated deep vein thrombosis [iDVT], n = 35; DVT+PE, n = 91) were included. In this study platelet function analyzer (PFA)-200, light transmission aggregometry (LTA), thrombin generation (TG) in presence (PRP) and absence (PFP) of platelets and platelet flow cytometry were investigated. LASSO regression was used to select clinical and platelet biomarkers that distinguish between VTE phenotypes.
PFA-200 results did not differ between VTE phenotypes. LTA from DVT+PE subjects showed lowest maximum aggregation after epinephrine and adenosine diphosphate compared to iPE and iDVT. Lower % of PAC-1-positive platelets after in-vitro trigger were present in DVT+PE and iPE compared to iDVT. TG in PRP had lower peak height and velocity in DVT+PE and iPE against iDVT. The results of LASSO regression for the distinction between DVT+PE vs iDVT identified 18 variables (AUC =0.93) of which 72% were platelet biomarkers. For distinction between iPE and iDVT, 10 variables were selected (AUC = 0.96) of which 50% were platelet-related. Obesity was the only variable weakly discriminating between DVT+PE vs iPE (AUC = 0.66).
This explorative study suggests an important distinction between PE-related phenotypes and iDVT when considering clinical and platelet function data. Lower platelet-dependent TG along with reduced platelet reactivity suggest higher platelet degranulation in PE-dependent phenotypes compared to iDVT.
血小板在静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)发病机制中的作用受到越来越多的关注;然而,关于疾病急性期血小板功能的信息有限。
根据 VTE 表型特征描述血小板功能。
患者/方法:共纳入 154 名受试者(孤立性肺栓塞 [iPE],n=28;孤立性深静脉血栓形成 [iDVT],n=35;DVT+PE,n=91)。在这项研究中,使用血小板功能分析仪(PFA)-200、光传输聚集测定法(LTA)、存在(PRP)和不存在(PFP)血小板的血栓酶生成(TG)以及血小板流式细胞术进行检测。使用 LASSO 回归来选择区分 VTE 表型的临床和血小板生物标志物。
PFA-200 结果在 VTE 表型之间无差异。与 iPE 和 iDVT 相比,DVT+PE 受试者的 LTA 在肾上腺素和二磷酸腺苷后显示出最低的最大聚集。与 iDVT 相比,DVT+PE 和 iPE 中体外触发后 PAC-1 阳性血小板的比例较低。PRP 中的 TG 峰高和速度在 DVT+PE 和 iPE 中低于 iDVT。LASSO 回归区分 DVT+PE 与 iDVT 的结果确定了 18 个变量(AUC=0.93),其中 72%为血小板生物标志物。区分 iPE 和 iDVT 时,选择了 10 个变量(AUC=0.96),其中 50%与血小板相关。肥胖是唯一可区分 DVT+PE 与 iPE 的弱变量(AUC=0.66)。
本探索性研究表明,在考虑临床和血小板功能数据时,PE 相关表型与 iDVT 之间存在重要区别。与 iDVT 相比,PE 相关表型中较低的血小板依赖性 TG 以及较低的血小板反应性表明,在 PE 依赖性表型中血小板脱颗粒程度更高。