Busby John, Price David, Al-Lehebi Riyad, Bosnic-Anticevich Sinthia, van Boven Job F M, Emmanuel Benjamin, FitzGerald J Mark, Gaga Mina, Hansen Susanne, Hew Mark, Iwanaga Takashi, Larenas Linnemann Désirée, Mahboub Bassam, Mitchell Patrick, Morrone Daniela, Pham Jonathan, Porsbjerg Celeste, Roche Nicolas, Wang Eileen, Eleangovan Neva, Heaney Liam G
Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Optimum Patient Care, Cambridge, UK.
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Nov 10;14:1375-1388. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S326213. eCollection 2021.
Asthma morbidity and health-care utilization are known to exhibit a steep socioeconomic gradient. Further investigation into the modulators of this effect is required to identify potentially modifiable factors.
We identified a cohort of patients with asthma from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD). We compared demographics, clinical variables, and health-care utilization by quintile of the UK 2011 Indices of Multiple Deprivation based on the location of the patients' general practice. Multivariable analyses were conducted using generalized linear models adjusting for year, age, and sex. We conducted subgroup analyses and interaction tests to investigate the impact of deprivation by age, sex, ethnicity, and treatment step.
Our analysis included 127,040 patients with asthma. Patients from the most deprived socio-economic status (SES) quintile were more likely to report uncontrolled disease (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.05) and to have an exacerbation during follow-up (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.42) than the least deprived quintile. They had higher blood eosinophils (ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.06) and decreased peak flow (ratio: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.94, 0.97) when compared to those in the least deprived quintile. The effect of deprivation on asthma control was greater among those aged over 75 years (OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.73) compared to those aged less than 35 years (OR: 1.22, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.74; p=0.019). Similarly, socioeconomic disparities in exacerbations were larger among those from ethnic minority groups (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.40, 2.68) than white patients (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.39; p=0.012).
We found worse disease control and increased exacerbation rates among patients with asthma from more deprived areas. There was evidence that the magnitude of socioeconomic disparities was elevated among older patients and those from ethnic minority groups. The drivers of these differences require further exploration.
已知哮喘发病率和医疗保健利用率呈现出明显的社会经济梯度。需要进一步调查这种效应的调节因素,以确定潜在的可改变因素。
我们从最佳患者护理研究数据库(OPCRD)中确定了一组哮喘患者。我们根据患者全科医疗的地点,按英国2011年多重剥夺指数的五分位数比较了人口统计学、临床变量和医疗保健利用率。使用广义线性模型进行多变量分析,并对年份、年龄和性别进行了调整。我们进行了亚组分析和交互作用测试,以研究年龄、性别、种族和治疗步骤对剥夺的影响。
我们的分析包括127,040名哮喘患者。与最不贫困的五分位数患者相比,社会经济地位(SES)最贫困的五分位数患者更有可能报告疾病未得到控制(比值比:1.54,95%置信区间:1.16,2.05),并且在随访期间病情加重(比值比:1.27,95%置信区间:1.13,1.42)。与最不贫困的五分位数患者相比,他们的血液嗜酸性粒细胞水平更高(比值:1.03;95%置信区间:1.00,1.06),峰值流量降低(比值:0.95,95%置信区间:0.94,0.97)。与年龄小于35岁的患者(比值比:1.22,95%置信区间:0.85,1.74;p = 0.019)相比,75岁以上患者中剥夺对哮喘控制的影响更大(比值比 = 1.81,95%置信区间:1.20,2.73)。同样,少数民族患者中病情加重的社会经济差异比白人患者更大(比值比:1.94,95%置信区间:1.40,2.68)(比值比:1.24,95%置信区间:1.10,1.39;p = 0.012)。
我们发现来自更贫困地区的哮喘患者疾病控制更差,病情加重率更高。有证据表明,老年患者和少数民族患者中社会经济差异的程度更大。这些差异的驱动因素需要进一步探索。