Beaumont Jordan D, Smith Natalie C, Starr David, Davis Danielle, Dalton Michelle, Nowicky Alexander, Russell Mark, Barwood Martin J
School of Social and Health Sciences, Leeds Trinity University, Leeds, UK.
Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Health and Life Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK.
Obes Rev. 2022 Feb;23(2):e13364. doi: 10.1111/obr.13364. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is becoming an increasingly popular technique for altering eating behaviors. Recent research suggests a possible eating behavior trait-dependent effect of tDCS. However, studies recruit participant populations with heterogeneous trait characteristics, including "healthy" individuals who do not present with eating behavior traits suggesting susceptibility to overconsumption. The present review considers the effects of tDCS across eating-related measures and explores whether a trait-dependent effect is evident across the literature. A literature search identified 28 articles using sham-controlled tDCS to modify eating-related measures. Random effects meta-analyses were performed, with subgroup analyses to identify differences between "healthy" and trait groups. Trivial overall effects (g = -0.12 to 0.09) of active versus sham tDCS were found. Subgroup analyses showed a more consistent effect for trait groups, with small and moderate effect size (g = -1.03 to 0.60), suggesting tDCS is dependent on participants' eating behavior traits. Larger effect sizes were found for those displaying traits associated with study outcomes (e.g., heightened food cravings). "Healthy" individuals appear to be unresponsive to stimulation. Based on this meta data, future work should recruit those with eating behavior trait susceptibilities to overconsumption, focusing on those who present with traits associated with the outcome of interest.
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)正日益成为一种改变饮食行为的流行技术。最近的研究表明,tDCS可能存在依赖于饮食行为特征的效应。然而,以往研究招募的参与者群体具有异质性特征,包括未表现出易发生过度消费的饮食行为特征的“健康”个体。本综述考虑了tDCS对各种饮食相关指标的影响,并探讨了在整个文献中是否存在依赖于特征的效应。文献检索确定了28篇使用假对照tDCS来改变饮食相关指标的文章。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,并进行亚组分析以确定“健康”组和有特定特征组之间的差异。结果发现,与假刺激相比,主动tDCS的总体效应微不足道(g = -0.12至0.09)。亚组分析显示,有特定特征组的效应更为一致,效应大小为小到中等(g = -1.03至0.60),这表明tDCS依赖于参与者的饮食行为特征。对于那些表现出与研究结果相关特征(如食物渴望增强)的人,效应大小更大。“健康”个体似乎对刺激无反应。基于这些元数据,未来的研究应招募那些有过度消费饮食行为特征易感性的人,重点关注那些表现出与感兴趣结果相关特征的人。