Department of Infectious and Liver Disease, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct;32(10):896-906. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2021.19694.
To date, studies have shown inconsistent results of treatment with bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMDSC) for patients with liver cirrhosis. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of BMDSC and standard therapy for liver cirrhosis.
Articles from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to April 2018. The index included Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, total bilirubin (TBIL), prothrombin time (PT), Child-Pugh score, and all-cause mortality.
A total of 9 studies with a total of 424 patients with liver cirrhosis were included in final meta-analysis. BMDSC therapy was associated with lower MELD within 3 months (P = .010), while it had no significant impact on MELD after 6 months (P = .074). There were no differences between BMDSC and standard therapy for ALT within 3 months (P = .336) and after 6 months (P = .379). BMDSC did not affect albumin level within 3 months (P = .196) and after 6 months (P = .840). BMDSC reduced the TBIL level within 3 months (P = .037) and was not associated with the TBIL level after 6 months (P = .914). There were no differences between BMDSC and standard therapy for PT within 3 months (P = .167) and after 6 months (P = .484). The Child-Pugh scores within 3 months (P = .342) and after 6 months (P = .133) were not associated with BMDSC treatment for liver cirrhosis patients. Finally, the BMDSC was not associated with the risk of all-cause mortality, as compared with standard therapy (P = .622).
BMDSC treatment for patients with liver cirrhosis could improve short-term MELD and TBIL, but not the risk of mortality, as compared with standard therapy.
迄今为止,关于骨髓来源的干细胞(BMDSC)治疗肝硬化患者的研究结果并不一致。本研究旨在比较 BMDSC 与标准疗法治疗肝硬化的疗效和安全性。
检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆从成立到 2018 年 4 月的文章。索引包括终末期肝病模型(MELD)、丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、白蛋白、总胆红素(TBIL)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、Child-Pugh 评分和全因死亡率。
最终纳入了 9 项研究,共 424 例肝硬化患者。BMDSC 治疗 3 个月内 MELD 较低(P =.010),但 6 个月后 MELD 无显著影响(P =.074)。3 个月内(P =.336)和 6 个月后(P =.379),BMDSC 与标准疗法对 ALT 无差异。3 个月内(P =.196)和 6 个月后(P =.840),BMDSC 对白蛋白水平无影响。BMDSC 降低 3 个月内的 TBIL 水平(P =.037),6 个月后与 TBIL 水平无关(P =.914)。3 个月内(P =.167)和 6 个月后(P =.484),BMDSC 与标准疗法对 PT 无差异。3 个月内(P =.342)和 6 个月后(P =.133),Child-Pugh 评分与肝硬化患者的 BMDSC 治疗无关。最后,与标准疗法相比,BMDSC 治疗与全因死亡率无关(P =.622)。
与标准疗法相比,BMDSC 治疗肝硬化患者可改善短期 MELD 和 TBIL,但不能降低死亡率。