Suppr超能文献

儿科急诊中的食物不安全状况和普遍筛查的可行性。

Food Insecurity in a Pediatric Emergency Department and the Feasibility of Universal Screening.

机构信息

Seattle Children's Research Institute, Emergency Department Research Team, Seattle, Washington.

University of Washington, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 27;22(6):1295-1300. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.7.52519.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Children with food insecurity (FI) experience adverse health outcomes due to inadequate quantity or quality of food. Food insecurity may be high among families seeking emergency care. The Hunger Vital Sign (HVS) is a two-question validated tool used to screen families for FI. Our goal in this study was to assess prevalence of FI among emergency department (ED) patients, patient-level risk factors for FI, and the feasibility of screening.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of FI in the ED. Parents or guardians of ED patients and adult patients (18 years or older) were approached for screening using the HVS during screening periods spanning weekdays/weekends and days/evenings. All ED patients were eligible, excluding siblings, repeat visits, critically ill patients, minors without a guardian, and families that healthcare staff asked us not to disturb. Families answered the HVS questions verbally or in writing, based on preference. Families with positive screens received information about food resources. We summarized patient and visit characteristics and defined medical complexity using a published algorithm. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess FI risk factors.

RESULTS

In July-August 2019, 527 patients presented during screening periods: 439 agreed to screening, 18 declined, 19 met exclusions, and 51 were missed. On average the screening tool required five minutes (range 3-10 minutes) to complete. Most families (328; 75%) preferred to answer in writing rather than verbally. Overall, 77 participants (17.5%) screened positive for FI. In regression analyses, FI was associated with self-reported race/ethnicity (combined variable) of African American or Black (odds ratio [OR] 5.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13-12.77), Hispanic (OR 3.47, 95% CI, 1.48-8.15), or mixed/other (OR 3.81, 95% CI, 1.54-9.39), compared to non-Hispanic white. FI was also associated with public insurance type (OR 5.74, 95% CI, 2.52-13.07, reference: private insurance), and each year of increasing patient age (OR 1.05, 95% CI, 1.01-1.09). There were no associations between FI and medical complexity or preferred language.

CONCLUSION

Food insecurity was common among our ED patients. Race and ethnicity, insurance status, and increasing patient age were associated with increased odds of FI. Efforts to include universal FI screening for ED patients with immediate connection to resources will enhance overall care quality and address important health needs.

摘要

简介

由于食物数量或质量不足,食物不安全的儿童会出现不良健康后果。寻求紧急护理的家庭中可能存在较高的食物不安全问题。饥饿生命体征(HVS)是一种经过验证的用于筛查家庭食物不安全的两问工具。我们在这项研究中的目标是评估急诊科(ED)患者中食物不安全的流行率、患者层面的食物不安全风险因素以及筛查的可行性。

方法

这是一项 ED 中食物不安全的横断面分析。在筛查期间,ED 患者的父母或监护人以及成年患者(18 岁或以上)会接受 HVS 筛查,筛查期横跨工作日/周末和白天/晚上。所有 ED 患者都符合条件,排除兄弟姐妹、重复就诊、重病患者、无监护人的未成年人以及医护人员要求我们不要打扰的家庭。根据患者的偏好,家庭通过口头或书面形式回答 HVS 问题。对阳性筛查家庭提供食物资源信息。我们总结了患者和就诊特征,并使用已发表的算法定义了医疗复杂性。多变量逻辑回归用于评估食物不安全的风险因素。

结果

在 2019 年 7-8 月的筛查期间,共有 527 名患者就诊:439 名同意筛查,18 名拒绝,19 名符合排除标准,51 名被遗漏。平均而言,筛查工具需要五分钟(范围 3-10 分钟)完成。大多数家庭(328 个;75%)更喜欢书面回答而不是口头回答。总的来说,77 名参与者(17.5%)筛查为食物不安全。在回归分析中,食物不安全与自我报告的种族/族裔(综合变量)为非裔美国人或黑人(比值比[OR]5.21,95%置信区间[CI]2.13-12.77)、西班牙裔(OR 3.47,95%CI,1.48-8.15)或混合/其他(OR 3.81,95%CI,1.54-9.39)有关,而非非西班牙裔白人。食物不安全也与公共保险类型(OR 5.74,95%CI,2.52-13.07,参考:私人保险)和患者年龄的每年增加(OR 1.05,95%CI,1.01-1.09)有关。食物不安全与医疗复杂性或首选语言之间没有关联。

结论

我们的 ED 患者中食物不安全很常见。种族和族裔、保险状况以及患者年龄的增加与食物不安全的几率增加有关。为 ED 患者提供普遍的食物不安全筛查并立即为他们提供资源,将提高整体护理质量并解决重要的健康需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffc9/8597682/84e28c2460a0/wjem-22-1295-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验