• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

入院儿童中粮食不安全筛查的差异和偏差。

Disparities and Biases in Food Insecurity Screening Among Admitted Children.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.

Section of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):e304-e307. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007602.

DOI:10.1542/hpeds.2023-007602
PMID:38899389
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Food insecurity (FI) has increasingly become a focus for hospitalized patients. The best methods for screening practices, particularly in hospitalized children, are unknown. The purpose of the study was to evaluate results of an electronic medical record (EMR) embedded, brief screening tool for FI among inpatients.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study from August 2020 to September 2022 for all children admitted to a quaternary children's hospital. Primary outcomes were proportion of those screened for FI and those identified to have a positive screen. FI was evaluated by The Hunger Vital Sign, a validated 2-question screen verbally obtained in the nursing intake form in the EMR. Covariates include demographic variables of age, sex, race, ethnicity, primary language, and insurance. Statistical analyses including all univariate outcome and bivariate comparisons were performed with SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

There were 31 553 patient encounters with 81.7% screened for FI. Patients had a median age of 6.3 years, were mostly male (54.2%), White (60.6%), non-Hispanic (92.7%), English-speaking (94.3%), and had government insurance (79.8%). Younger (0-2 years), non-White, and noninsured patients were all screened significantly less often for FI (all P < .001). A total of 3.4% were identified as having FI. Patients who were older, non-White, Hispanic, non-English speaking, and had nonprivate insurance had higher FI (all P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of an EMR screening tool intended to be universal, we found variation in how we screen for FI. At times, we missed those who would benefit the most from intervention, and thus it may be subject to implementation bias.

摘要

背景和目的

食物不安全(FI)已逐渐成为住院患者关注的焦点。针对住院患者,最佳的筛查方法,尤其是针对住院儿童的筛查方法,尚未明确。本研究旨在评估一种嵌入电子病历(EMR)中的简短 FI 筛查工具在住院患者中的应用效果。

方法

这是一项 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 9 月在一家四级儿童医院进行的横断面研究,纳入所有入院儿童。主要结局为 FI 筛查比例和阳性筛查比例。FI 通过 The Hunger Vital Sign 进行评估,这是一种在 EMR 中的护理入院表单中通过口头获取的 2 个问题验证过的筛查工具。协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、民族、主要语言和保险等人口统计学变量。采用 SAS 9.4 进行所有单变量和双变量比较的统计分析。

结果

共纳入 31553 例患者,其中 81.7%接受了 FI 筛查。患者的中位年龄为 6.3 岁,男性占 54.2%,白人占 60.6%,非西班牙裔占 92.7%,英语为主要语言占 94.3%,政府保险占 79.8%。年龄较小(0-2 岁)、非白种人、无保险的患者 FI 筛查频率显著较低(均 P <.001)。共有 3.4%的患者被诊断为 FI。年龄较大、非白种人、西班牙裔、非英语为主要语言和非私人保险的患者 FI 发生率更高(均 P <.001)。

结论

尽管使用了旨在普及的 EMR 筛查工具,但我们发现 FI 的筛查方式存在差异。有时,我们会错过那些最需要干预的患者,因此这可能存在实施偏倚。

相似文献

1
Disparities and Biases in Food Insecurity Screening Among Admitted Children.入院儿童中粮食不安全筛查的差异和偏差。
Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):e304-e307. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007602.
2
Food Insecurity in a Pediatric Emergency Department and the Feasibility of Universal Screening.儿科急诊中的食物不安全状况和普遍筛查的可行性。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 27;22(6):1295-1300. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.7.52519.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Written Versus Verbal Food Insecurity Screening in One Primary Care Clinic.书面与口头食物不安全筛查在一家基层医疗诊所的应用。
Acad Pediatr. 2020 Mar;20(2):203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
5
Food Insecurity Screening of Hospitalized Patients: A Descriptive Analysis.住院患者的食物不安全筛查:描述性分析。
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;12(6):e196-e200. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006549.
6
Qualitative Study of Food Insecurity in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠肺炎疫情期间住院儿科患者食物不安全的定性研究。
South Med J. 2024 May;117(5):260-265. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001684.
7
Food Insecurity Screening and Intervention in United States Children's Hospitals.美国儿童医院的食物不安全筛查和干预。
Hosp Pediatr. 2022 Oct 1;12(10):849-857. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2022-006755.
8
Assessment of tobacco smoke exposure in the pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科烟草烟雾暴露评估。
Prev Med. 2016 Apr;85:42-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
Screening for Food Insecurity in a Pediatric Diabetes Program: Provider and Parent/Guardian Perspectives.在儿科糖尿病项目中进行粮食不安全筛查:提供者和家长/监护人的观点。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2024 Oct;63(9):1292-1299. doi: 10.1177/00099228231222987. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
10
Food Insecurity and Community-Based Food Resources Among Caregivers of Hospitalized Children.住院患儿照顾者的食物不安全状况和社区食物资源。
Hosp Pediatr. 2024 Jul 1;14(7):520-531. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2023-007597.