Institute for Work & Health, Toronto, Ontario; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto; and the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health; and Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario.
Health Rep. 2021 Nov 17;32(11):16-27. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202101000002-eng.
There are important information gaps concerning the prevalence and distribution of infection control practices (ICPs) within workplaces continuing to operate during the COVID-19 pandemic.
To address these gaps, this paper examines the prevalence of workplace ICPs among employed respondents to Statistics Canada's Labour Force Survey in the months of July, August and September 2020 (n = 53,316). The article also seeks to identify sociodemographic, occupational and workplace factors associated with the level and type of workplace ICPs. ICPs included the reorganization of the workplace to allow for physical distancing, increased access to hand sanitizer or handwashing facilities, enhanced cleaning protocols and access to personal protective equipment. Multivariable regression models were used to examine the number of ICPs in place and the absence of specific ICPs.
Generally high levels of reported protections among workers (15% of the sample had three ICPs and 72% had four or more ICPs) were observed. However, certain subgroups of workers were less likely to have ICPs in place. These included workers who were male; those with lower levels of education, shorter job tenure, or non-permanent work; and those working in the agricultural, construction, transportation and warehousing, and education industries.
In a large sample of Canadian employees, generally high levels of workplace ICPs to reduce the transmission of COVID-19 were observed. Groups with lower levels of ICPs included workers at the start of their employment, workers with low levels of education, and certain industry groups.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间持续运营的工作场所中,感染控制实践(ICPs)的流行率和分布存在重要的信息差距。
为了弥补这些差距,本文调查了 2020 年 7 月、8 月和 9 月加拿大劳动力调查受雇受访者中工作场所 ICP 的流行率(n=53316)。本文还试图确定与工作场所 ICP 水平和类型相关的社会人口学、职业和工作场所因素。ICPs 包括重新组织工作场所以允许身体距离、增加手部消毒剂或洗手设施的使用、增强清洁协议和获得个人防护设备。使用多变量回归模型检查实施的 ICP 数量和特定 ICP 的缺失情况。
观察到工人报告的保护措施总体水平较高(15%的样本有三项 ICP,72%的样本有四项或更多 ICP)。然而,某些工人群体不太可能实施 ICP。这些群体包括男性工人;受教育程度较低、工作任期较短或非永久性工作的工人;以及从事农业、建筑、运输和仓储以及教育行业的工人。
在加拿大员工的大样本中,观察到普遍采取了高水平的工作场所 ICP 来降低 COVID-19 的传播。实施 ICP 水平较低的群体包括就业初期的工人、受教育程度较低的工人以及某些行业群体。