Clinic of Occupational Medicine, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
Clinic of Occupational Diseases, Ankara Gazi Mustafa Kemal Occupational and Environmental Diseases Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
Balkan Med J. 2023 Mar 8;40(2):124-130. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2023.2022-10-116. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2, the virus causing coronavirus disease-2019, is a biological hazard in workplaces. Thus, protective measures should be applied. Despite their potential role, the perspective of workplace representatives on coronavirus disease-2019 measures is rarely investigated.
To assess the perspective of workplace union representatives on coronavirus disease-2019 measures in their workplaces in the first year of the pandemic in Turkey.
A descriptive observational study.
This national descriptive study included workplace chief representatives of 33 workers’ unions. A 42-item electronic survey was used to collect data to evaluate the practice of job organization, social distancing and personal protective equipment use, sanitization, and occupational safety and health training.
The study included 509 workplace chief representatives’ responses. Results showed that several administrative measures, including suspending production or work, encouraging workers to take leave, implementing alternate work schedules, isolating any coronavirus disease-2019 case from other workers in a designated room, and avoiding face-to-face meetings, were not available in more than half of the workplaces. The mean number of available measures was significantly high (p < 0.001) in the industrial sector and workplaces with 250 or more workers. Almost all union representatives (98.8%) reported at least one diagnosis of coronavirus disease-2019 among workers, and 12.6% reported a positive history of coronavirus disease-2019-related mortality. The regression model for any history of coronavirus disease-2019 mortality in workers demonstrated a significantly increased association with workplaces with 250 or more workers compared with workplaces with less than 250 workers (odds ratio =2.99, 95% confidence interval =1.65-5.44, p < 0.001).
The results indicate failure in administrative measures and the need for improvement in medium- and small-sized workplaces and the non-industrial sector. All local and national stakeholders need to pay special attention to address these issues. Future studies should evaluate on-site coronavirus disease-2019 workplace measures and their effectiveness.
导致 2019 年冠状病毒病的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 是工作场所中的生物危害。因此,应采取防护措施。尽管它们具有潜在作用,但很少调查工作场所代表对 2019 年冠状病毒病措施的看法。
评估土耳其大流行第一年工作场所工会代表对工作场所 2019 年冠状病毒病措施的看法。
描述性观察研究。
本项全国性描述性研究包括 33 个工会的工作场所首席代表。使用 42 项电子调查收集数据,以评估工作组织、社会隔离和个人防护设备使用、消毒以及职业安全和健康培训的实施情况。
该研究包括 509 名工作场所首席代表的答复。结果表明,在超过一半的工作场所中,没有实施几种行政措施,包括暂停生产或工作、鼓励工人休假、实行轮班制、将任何 2019 年冠状病毒病病例隔离在指定房间内并避免面对面会议。在工业部门和有 250 名或以上工人的工作场所中,可提供的措施数量明显较高(p<0.001)。几乎所有工会代表(98.8%)报告称,在工人中至少有一例 2019 年冠状病毒病确诊病例,12.6%的代表报告称有与 2019 年冠状病毒病相关的死亡阳性史。在工人中任何 2019 年冠状病毒病死亡史的回归模型表明,与少于 250 名工人的工作场所相比,与 250 名或以上工人的工作场所的关联显著增加(比值比=2.99,95%置信区间=1.65-5.44,p<0.001)。
结果表明行政措施失败,需要改进中型和小型工作场所和非工业部门。所有地方和国家利益攸关方都需要特别注意解决这些问题。未来的研究应评估现场 2019 年冠状病毒病工作场所措施及其效果。