Ward Michael J, Shuster John L, Mohr Nicholas M, Kaboli Peter J, Mixon Amanda S, Kemmer Jennifer, Campbell Corey, McNaughton Candace D
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Vanderbilt University Department of Biomedical Informatics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2022 Jul;28(7):985-993. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0263. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of an emergency telehealth intervention in unscheduled settings (emergency department [ED] and urgent care clinic [UCC]) within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework to conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of a novel telehealth program implemented in the VHA (Hospital System) in March 2020. We compared the 3 months preimplementation (December 1, 2019 through February 29, 2020) with the 3 months postimplementation (April 1, 2020 through June 30, 2020), then followed sustainability through January 31, 2021. Qualitative data were obtained from surveys and semistructured interviews of staff and providers and analyzed with thematic analysis. Patient demographics and dispositions were similar pre- and postimplementation. The telemental health intervention was used in 319 (83%) unscheduled mental health consultations in the postimplementation phase. After implementation, we did not detect adverse trends in length of stay, 7-day revisits, or 30-day mortality. Use remained high with 82% ( = 1,010) of all unscheduled mental health consultations performed by telemental health in the sustainability phase. Staff and clinician interviews identified the following themes in the use of telemental health: (1) enhanced efficiency without compromising quality and safety, (2) initial apprehension, (3) the COVID-19 pandemic, and (4) sustainability after resolution of the COVID-19 pandemic. This mixed-methods evaluation of unscheduled telemental health implementation found that its use was feasible, did not impact the safety and efficacy of mental health consultations, and was highly acceptable and sustainable in unscheduled settings.
对退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)非预约环境(急诊科[ED]和紧急护理诊所[UCC])中的紧急远程医疗干预措施进行混合方法评估。我们使用“覆盖、效果、采用、实施、维持”(RE-AIM)框架,对2020年3月在VHA(医院系统)实施的一项新型远程医疗项目进行混合方法评估。我们将实施前的3个月(2019年12月1日至2020年2月29日)与实施后的3个月(2020年4月1日至2020年6月30日)进行比较,然后持续跟踪至2021年1月31日的可持续性情况。定性数据来自对工作人员和提供者的调查及半结构化访谈,并采用主题分析进行分析。实施前后患者的人口统计学特征和处置情况相似。在实施后阶段,319例(83%)非预约心理健康咨询中使用了远程心理健康干预措施。实施后,我们未发现住院时间、7天复诊率或30天死亡率出现不良趋势。在可持续性阶段,远程心理健康进行的所有非预约心理健康咨询中,使用率仍高达82%(n = 1010)。工作人员和临床医生访谈确定了远程心理健康使用中的以下主题:(1)在不影响质量和安全的情况下提高效率;(2)最初的担忧;(3)2019冠状病毒病疫情;(4)2019冠状病毒病疫情解决后的可持续性。这项对非预约远程心理健康实施情况的混合方法评估发现,其使用是可行的,不影响心理健康咨询的安全性和有效性,并且在非预约环境中高度可接受且可持续。