Suppr超能文献

康复锻炼和教育项目以预防非致残性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作后的血管事件(PREVENT 试验):一项随机对照试验。

Program of Rehabilitative Exercise and Education to Avert Vascular Events After Non-Disabling Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack (PREVENT Trial): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

School of Physiotherapy, 3688Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Physical Medicine, Nova Scotia Health Authority, 3688Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.

出版信息

Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Feb;36(2):119-130. doi: 10.1177/15459683211060345. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-disabling stroke (NDS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) herald the possibility of future, more debilitating vascular events. Evidence is conflicting about potency of exercise and education in reducing risk factors for second stroke.

METHODS

Three-site, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with 184 participants <3 months of NDS or TIA (mean age, 65 years; 66% male) randomized to usual care (UC) or UC + 12-week program of exercise and education (PREVENT). Primary (resting systolic blood pressure) and secondary outcomes (diastolic blood pressure [DBPrest], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], total cholesterol [TC], TC/HDL, triglycerides, fasting glucose, and body mass index) were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and 6- and 12-month follow-up. Peak oxygen consumption (VOpeak) was measured at baseline, post-intervention, 12-month assessments.

RESULTS

Significant between-group differences at post-intervention favored PREVENT group over UC: DBPrest (mean difference [MD]: -3.2 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.3, -.2, = .04) and LDL-C (MD: -.31 mmol/L, 95% CI: -.42, -.20, = .02). Trends of improvement in PREVENT group were noted in several variables between baseline and 6-month follow-up but not sustained at 12-month follow-up. Of note, VO peak did not change over time in either group.

CONCLUSION

Impact of PREVENT on vascular risk factor reduction was more modest than anticipated, possibly because several outcome variables approximated normative values at baseline and training intensity may have been sub-optimal. Further investigation is warranted to determine when exercise and education programs are viable adjuncts to pharmaceutical management for reduction of risk factors for second stroke. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: #NCT00885456.

摘要

背景

非致残性中风(NDS)和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)预示着未来更具致残性血管事件的可能性。关于运动和教育在降低第二次中风风险因素方面的效力,证据存在冲突。

方法

这是一项三地点、单盲、随机对照试验,共有 184 名 NDS 或 TIA 后<3 个月的参与者(平均年龄 65 岁,66%为男性)被随机分配至常规护理(UC)或 UC+12 周的运动和教育方案(PREVENT)。主要结局(静息收缩压)和次要结局(舒张压[DBPrest]、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇[HDL-C]、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇[LDL-C]、总胆固醇[TC]、TC/HDL、甘油三酯、空腹血糖和体重指数)在基线、干预后以及 6 个月和 12 个月随访时进行评估。峰值摄氧量(VOpeak)在基线、干预后和 12 个月评估时进行测量。

结果

干预后组间存在显著差异,PREVENT 组优于 UC 组:DBPrest(平均差异[MD]:-3.2mmHg,95%置信区间[CI]:-6.3,-.2, =.04)和 LDL-C(MD:-.31mmol/L,95% CI:-.42,-.20, =.02)。PREVENT 组在几个变量中观察到从基线到 6 个月随访的改善趋势,但在 12 个月随访时并未持续。值得注意的是,两组的 VOpeak 在整个研究过程中均未发生变化。

结论

与预期相比,PREVENT 对降低血管风险因素的影响较为有限,这可能是因为几个结局变量在基线时接近正常值,并且训练强度可能不够理想。需要进一步研究以确定运动和教育方案何时可作为药物管理的可行辅助手段,以降低第二次中风的风险因素。http://www.clinicaltrials.gov。独特标识符:#NCT00885456。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f33b/9066689/915e7512640f/10.1177_15459683211060345-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验