一项随机交叉试验比较了在 1 型糖尿病成人中使用混合闭环胰岛素输送进行中等强度、高强度和阻力运动期间的血糖控制,并对潜在的其他信号进行了分析。
A Randomized Crossover Trial Comparing Glucose Control During Moderate-Intensity, High-Intensity, and Resistance Exercise With Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery While Profiling Potential Additional Signals in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes.
机构信息
1Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
2Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
出版信息
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):194-203. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1593.
OBJECTIVE
To compare glucose control with hybrid closed-loop (HCL) when challenged by high intensity exercise (HIE), moderate intensity exercise (MIE), and resistance exercise (RE) while profiling counterregulatory hormones, lactate, ketones, and kinetic data in adults with type 1 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
This study was an open-label multisite randomized crossover trial. Adults with type 1 diabetes undertook 40 min of HIE, MIE, and RE in random order while using HCL (Medtronic MiniMed 670G) with a temporary target set 2 h prior to and during exercise and 15 g carbohydrates if pre-exercise glucose was <126 mg/dL to prevent hypoglycemia. Primary outcome was median (interquartile range) continuous glucose monitoring time-in-range (TIR; 70-180 mg/dL) for 14 h post-exercise commencement. Accelerometer data and venous glucose, ketones, lactate, and counterregulatory hormones were measured for 280 min post-exercise commencement.
RESULTS
Median TIR was 81% (67, 93%), 91% (80, 94%), and 80% (73, 89%) for 0-14 h post-exercise commencement for HIE, MIE, and RE, respectively (n = 30), with no difference between exercise types (MIE vs. HIE; P = 0.11, MIE vs. RE, P = 0.11; and HIE vs. RE, P = 0.90). Time-below-range was 0% for all exercise bouts. For HIE and RE compared with MIE, there were greater increases, respectively, in noradrenaline (P = 0.01 and P = 0.004), cortisol (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001), lactate (P ≤ 0.001 and P ≤ 0.001), and heart rate (P = 0.007 and P = 0.015). During HIE compared with MIE, there were greater increases in growth hormone (P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS
Under controlled conditions, HCL provided satisfactory glucose control with no difference between exercise type. Lactate, counterregulatory hormones, and kinetic data differentiate type and intensity of exercise, and their measurement may help inform insulin needs during exercise. However, their potential utility as modulators of insulin dosing will be limited by the pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous insulin delivery.
目的
比较高强度运动(HIE)、中等强度运动(MIE)和抗阻运动(RE)时混合闭环(HCL)对葡萄糖控制的影响,并描绘 1 型糖尿病成人的激素、乳酸、酮体和动力学数据特征。
研究设计和方法
这是一项开放标签、多站点随机交叉试验。成人 1 型糖尿病患者在运动前 2 小时和运动期间使用 HCL(美敦力 MiniMed 670G),临时目标设定为临时目标,并在运动前血糖<126mg/dL 时给予 15g 碳水化合物,以预防低血糖,随机进行 40 分钟的 HIE、MIE 和 RE。主要结局为运动后 14 小时连续血糖监测时间范围(TIR;70-180mg/dL)的中位数(四分位数间距)。运动后 280 分钟测量加速度计数据和静脉血糖、酮体、乳酸和激素。
结果
HIE、MIE 和 RE 运动后 0-14 小时的 TIR 中位数分别为 81%(67,93%)、91%(80,94%)和 80%(73,89%)(n=30),运动类型之间无差异(HIE 与 MIE,P=0.11;MIE 与 RE,P=0.11;HIE 与 RE,P=0.90)。所有运动均无血糖低于目标范围的情况。与 MIE 相比,HIE 和 RE 时分别出现更大的去甲肾上腺素(P=0.01 和 P=0.004)、皮质醇(P<0.001 和 P=0.001)、乳酸(P≤0.001 和 P≤0.001)和心率(P=0.007 和 P=0.015)升高。与 MIE 相比,HIE 时生长激素(P=0.024)增加更大。
结论
在受控条件下,HCL 提供了令人满意的血糖控制,运动类型之间没有差异。乳酸、激素和动力学数据区分了运动的类型和强度,其测量结果可能有助于了解运动期间的胰岛素需求。然而,由于皮下胰岛素输送的药代动力学,它们作为胰岛素剂量调节剂的潜在用途将受到限制。