• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速奥马珠单抗家庭自我给药途径的安全性评估

Safety Evaluation of an Expedited Omalizumab Home Self-Administration Pathway.

作者信息

Hussain Zobia, Devlin Lisa

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, GBR.

Allergy and Immunology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Nov 10;13(11):e19434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19434. eCollection 2021 Nov.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.19434
PMID:34790499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8584126/
Abstract

Introduction The Northern Ireland Regional Immunology Service (NIRIS) has developed an expedited omalizumab home self-administration pathway to reduce face-to-face clinic attendance during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This audit evaluates the safety of this pathway with a particular focus on anaphylaxis. Objectives This study aimed to retrospectively audit the records of 39 patients undertaking expedited home self-administration at NIRIS for complications, particularly emergency department attendance for anaphylaxis. The target was for 100% of patients to complete a six-month course without experiencing anaphylaxis related to omalizumab administration. Materials and methods A total of 39 records of patients who underwent expedited omalizumab self-administration were audited by a single reviewer. They were prospectively collected between March 2020 and August 2021. Clinical data were collected from the Northern Ireland Electronic Care Record (NIECR). Results Hundred percent of patients were in the process of completing or had completed a six-dose course without anaphylaxis. During the course of omalizumab, 7.6% of patients attended the emergency department. Zero percent of patients have experienced anaphylaxis triggered by omalizumab. The target of 100% patients completing the expedited pathway without omalizumab-related anaphylaxis was met. Conclusion Home self-administration of omalizumab is preferred by patients and clinicians for reducing expense, travel, and unnecessary clinical contact during the COVID-19 pandemic. An expedited omalizumab home self-administration training pathway appears to be safe in a population of Northern Irish patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). More research is needed to determine whether the expedited pathway should become the standard of care post-pandemic.

摘要

引言 北爱尔兰地区免疫服务中心(NIRIS)制定了一条简化的奥马珠单抗家庭自我给药途径,以减少2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间的面对面门诊就诊。本审计评估了该途径的安全性,特别关注过敏反应。

目的 本研究旨在回顾性审计39例在NIRIS接受简化家庭自我给药的患者的记录,以查找并发症,特别是因过敏反应而到急诊科就诊的情况。目标是100%的患者完成六个月疗程且未发生与奥马珠单抗给药相关的过敏反应。

材料和方法 由一名审阅者对39例接受简化奥马珠单抗自我给药的患者记录进行审计。这些记录于2020年3月至2021年8月期间前瞻性收集。临床数据从北爱尔兰电子护理记录(NIECR)中收集。

结果 100%的患者正在完成或已经完成了六剂疗程且未发生过敏反应。在奥马珠单抗治疗过程中,7.6%的患者到急诊科就诊。0%的患者发生了由奥马珠单抗引发的过敏反应。达到了10

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900b/8584126/5fbec4cff826/cureus-0013-00000019434-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900b/8584126/a4a181c4b82a/cureus-0013-00000019434-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900b/8584126/5fbec4cff826/cureus-0013-00000019434-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900b/8584126/a4a181c4b82a/cureus-0013-00000019434-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/900b/8584126/5fbec4cff826/cureus-0013-00000019434-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety Evaluation of an Expedited Omalizumab Home Self-Administration Pathway.快速奥马珠单抗家庭自我给药途径的安全性评估
Cureus. 2021 Nov 10;13(11):e19434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19434. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Rapid transition to home omalizumab treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria during the COVID-19 pandemic: A patient perspective.在新冠疫情期间慢性自发性荨麻疹患者快速过渡到家庭使用奥马珠单抗治疗:患者视角
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Oct;14(10):100587. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100587. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Estimation of Health and Economic Benefits of Clinic Versus Home Administration of Omalizumab and Mepolizumab.评估奥马珠单抗和美泊利珠单抗在诊所与家庭管理中的健康和经济效益。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020 Feb;8(2):565-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.037. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
4
Multicentre experience of home omalizumab treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria.多中心家庭奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹的经验。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2020 Nov;27(6):367-368. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001914. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
5
The impact of home treatment and self-administration of omalizumab on chronic urticaria.奥马珠单抗家庭治疗及自我给药对慢性荨麻疹的影响
World Allergy Organ J. 2022 Dec 7;15(12):100725. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100725. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria with an inadequate response to H1-antihistamines: an expert opinion.对H1抗组胺药反应不足的慢性自发性荨麻疹的治疗:专家意见
Eur J Dermatol. 2017 Feb 1;27(1):10-19. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2016.2905.
7
A retrospective analysis omalizumab treatment patterns in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: a real-world study in Belgium.一项奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的回顾性分析:比利时真实世界研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jan;34(1):127-134. doi: 10.1111/jdv.15684. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Treatment response to omalizumab in patients with refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria.奥马珠单抗治疗难治性慢性自发性荨麻疹患者的应答。
Int J Dermatol. 2018 Apr;57(4):417-422. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13935. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
9
Efficacy of omalizumab treatment for pediatric chronic spontaneous urticaria: A multi-center retrospective case series.奥马珠单抗治疗儿童慢性自发性荨麻疹的疗效:一项多中心回顾性病例系列研究。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2020 Nov;37(6):1051-1054. doi: 10.1111/pde.14360. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
10
Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Refractory to Conventional Therapy: An Italian Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Suggestions for Long-Term Maintenance Strategies.奥马珠单抗治疗常规治疗难治性慢性自发性荨麻疹:一项意大利回顾性临床分析及长期维持策略建议
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2018 Jun;8(2):291-301. doi: 10.1007/s13555-018-0240-7. Epub 2018 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid transition to home omalizumab treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria during the COVID-19 pandemic: A patient perspective.在新冠疫情期间慢性自发性荨麻疹患者快速过渡到家庭使用奥马珠单抗治疗:患者视角
World Allergy Organ J. 2021 Oct;14(10):100587. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100587. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
2
A Hybrid Virtual Fracture Clinic is Safe and Efficacious in the COVID-19 Era: Stay at Home and Save Lives.混合虚拟骨折诊所在新冠疫情时代是安全有效的:居家保命。
Cureus. 2021 May 5;13(5):e14849. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14849.
3
Hand Trauma Virtual Clinics Prove Effective During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
手部创伤虚拟诊疗在 COVID-19 大流行期间效果显著。
Hand (N Y). 2023 Mar;18(2):349-354. doi: 10.1177/15589447211017210. Epub 2021 May 31.
4
Self-administration of omalizumab: why not? A literature review and expert opinion.奥马珠单抗的自我给药:为什么不?文献回顾和专家意见。
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2021 Apr;21(4):499-507. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1882990. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
5
The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Adult and Pediatric Allergy & Immunology Services in the UK National Health Service.新冠疫情对英国国民保健制度中成人群体和儿童过敏与免疫学服务的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Feb;9(2):709-722.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.11.038. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
6
Patients'/Caregivers' Perspectives on Telemedicine Service for Advanced Cancer Patients during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Exploratory Survey.新冠疫情期间晚期癌症患者/照顾者对远程医疗服务的看法:一项探索性调查
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;26(Suppl 1):S40-S44. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_145_20. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
7
Satisfaction with the use of telehealth during COVID-19: An integrative review.COVID-19 期间对远程医疗使用的满意度:一项综合综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2020 Nov;2:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2020.100008. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
8
The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: a systematic review based on current evidence.新冠疫情期间远程医疗的作用:基于现有证据的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 1;20(1):1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4.
9
Biological agents for severe asthma: the evolution of the at-home self-injection approach.严重哮喘的生物制剂:家庭自我注射方法的演变。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug;20(4):421-427. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000656.
10
Switching to teleconsultation for rheumatology in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: feasibility and patient response in India.在 COVID-19 大流行之后转向风湿病学的远程咨询:在印度的可行性和患者反应。
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Sep;39(9):2757-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05200-6. Epub 2020 May 30.