• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

金砖国家绿色经济设计:金融流入、可再生能源消费与环境质量的动态关系。

Green economy design in BRICS: dynamic relationship between financial inflow, renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality.

机构信息

Guizhou Company Comprehensive Planning Office, China National Tobacco Corporation, Guiyang, China.

Western Modernization Research Center, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22505-22514. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17376-8. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-17376-8
PMID:34792773
Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) and remittances are a source of financing that allows the environment to be clean by promoting green innovation. This study empirically examines the impact of financial inflow on renewable energy consumption and environmental quality in BRICS over the period of 1991-2019. The basic results emanate from the NARDL-PMG but robustness observed through FMOLS and DOLS. A positive change in FDI has a positive effect on CO2 emissions, whereas a negative change in FDI significantly reduces CO2 emissions in the long run, while positive and negative shocks to remittance increase the renewable energy consumption in the long run. A positive shock in remittance has no significant impact on CO2 emissions, while a negative shock in remittance leads to an increase in CO2 emissions in the long run. Our results are robust to different econometric methods. The findings of the study have some implications for devising renewable energy consumption and CO2 emission reduction policies in BRICS.

摘要

外商直接投资(FDI)和汇款是一种融资来源,可以通过促进绿色创新来实现环境清洁。本研究通过 1991-2019 年的 NARDL-PMG 但通过 FMOLS 和 DOLS 观察到稳健性,实证检验了金融流入对金砖国家可再生能源消费和环境质量的影响。FDI 的正向变化对 CO2 排放有正向影响,而 FDI 的负向变化从长期来看显著降低了 CO2 排放,而汇款的正向和负向冲击都会增加可再生能源的消费从长远来看。汇款的正冲击对 CO2 排放没有显著影响,而汇款的负冲击会导致 CO2 排放从长期来看增加。我们的结果对不同的计量经济学方法具有稳健性。研究结果对制定金砖国家可再生能源消费和减少 CO2 排放政策具有一定意义。

相似文献

1
Green economy design in BRICS: dynamic relationship between financial inflow, renewable energy consumption, and environmental quality.金砖国家绿色经济设计:金融流入、可再生能源消费与环境质量的动态关系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22505-22514. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17376-8. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
2
Green finance, renewable energy, financial development, FDI, and CO nexus under the impact of higher education.绿色金融、可再生能源、金融发展、外国直接投资与高等教育的共同作用对 CO2 排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(12):33524-33541. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24582-5. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
3
The role of green finance and governance effectiveness in the impact of renewable energy investment on CO emissions in BRICS economies.绿色金融和治理效率在可再生能源投资对金砖国家 CO 排放影响中的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;358:120906. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120906. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
4
Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries.外国直接投资和可再生能源消费会影响二氧化碳排放吗?来自京都议定书附件国家的面板自回归分布滞后模型方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Nov;23(21):21669-21681. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7413-7. Epub 2016 Aug 13.
5
Fintech, green imports, technology, and FDI inflow: their role in CO2 emissions reduction and the path to COP26: a comparative analysis of China.金融科技、绿色进口、技术和外国直接投资流入:在减少二氧化碳排放和实现《联合国气候变化框架公约》第 26 次缔约方会议目标方面的作用:中国的比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10508-10520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31732-w. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
6
Energy consumption and innovation-environmental degradation nexus in BRICS countries: new evidence from NARDL approach using carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions.金砖国家能源消耗与创新-环境恶化关系研究:基于二氧化碳和氧化亚氮排放的 NARDL 方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(53):113561-113586. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29927-2. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
7
Revisiting the environmental impact of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, remittances, and economic growth: CO emissions versus ecological footprint for top remittance-receiving countries.重新审视可再生能源、不可再生能源、汇款和经济增长对环境的影响:以排放量和生态足迹为指标,对比顶级汇款接收国。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(23):63565-63579. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26812-w. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
8
The dynamic linkage between financial inflow and environmental quality: evidence from China and policy options.资金流入与环境质量之间的动态联系:来自中国的证据及政策选择
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(1):1051-1059. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15616-5. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
9
Energy consumption, CO emissions, foreign direct investment, and economic growth in Malaysia: an NARDL technique.马来西亚的能源消耗、二氧化碳排放、外国直接投资与经济增长:一种非对称自回归分布滞后(NARDL)技术
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):63096-63108. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26246-4. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Assessing the dynamic linkage between energy efficiency, renewable energy consumption, and CO emissions in China.评估中国能源效率、可再生能源消费和二氧化碳排放之间的动态联系。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(13):19540-19552. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17145-7. Epub 2021 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of natural resources, renewable energy sources, eco-innovation and carbon taxes in carbon neutrality: Evidence from G7 economies.自然资源、可再生能源、生态创新和碳税在碳中和中的作用:来自七国集团经济体的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33526. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33526. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Clarifying the relationship between green investment, technological innovation, financial openness, and renewable energy consumption in MINT.厘清MINT四国中绿色投资、技术创新、金融开放与可再生能源消费之间的关系。
Heliyon. 2023 Oct 16;9(11):e21083. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21083. eCollection 2023 Nov.