• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本效益分析的起源:法国与美国的比较视角

The origin of cost-benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States.

作者信息

Jiang Wei, Marggraf Rainer

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 18 Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100085, China.

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Göttingen, Platz Der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Nov 18;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00330-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12962-021-00330-3
PMID:34794465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8600932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), as a common instrument in the decision making process on how to allocate financial resources, has been widely used in various research areas and in almost all of countries over the world. However, the origin and the historical development of CBA has long been subject to neglect. We attempt to fill this gap and clarify the origin and the early development of CBA.

METHODS

A comparative analysis is used to investigate the origin and the early development of CBA in France and the USA. The comparison is focused on two questions: (1) which criteria should be applied to decide whether or not a project should be carried out, and (2) with which procedure these criteria can be used for real projects.

RESULTS

The origin of CBA can be dated back to the work of Saint-Pierre in France in 1708. Dupuit introduces the concept of consumer's surplus that founds the economic basis of CBA. These works are not taken seriously in France and do not draw attention from other countries. Hence, until the 1930s, the principle of CBA is newly proposed in the US and the Green Book marks the mature of CBA.

CONCLUSIONS

The early development of CBA in France and the US is independent from the aspects of historical background, personnel, approaches and standardization. This study could help researchers of various disciplines be sure about the history of CBA when they perform this analysis in their research areas.

摘要

背景

成本效益分析(CBA)作为决策过程中关于如何分配财政资源的一种常用手段,已在世界上几乎所有国家的各个研究领域中广泛使用。然而,CBA的起源和历史发展长期以来一直受到忽视。我们试图填补这一空白,并阐明CBA的起源和早期发展。

方法

采用比较分析的方法来研究法国和美国CBA的起源和早期发展。比较集中在两个问题上:(1)应采用哪些标准来决定一个项目是否应该实施,以及(2)这些标准可通过何种程序用于实际项目。

结果

CBA的起源可以追溯到1708年法国圣皮埃尔的著作。杜普伊特引入了消费者剩余的概念,这为CBA奠定了经济基础。这些著作在法国未受到重视,也未引起其他国家的关注。因此,直到20世纪30年代,CBA的原则才在美国被重新提出,《绿皮书》标志着CBA的成熟。

结论

CBA在法国和美国的早期发展在历史背景、人员、方法和标准化等方面是独立的。这项研究可以帮助各学科的研究人员在其研究领域进行这种分析时确定CBA的历史。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af6/8600932/4842023797aa/12962_2021_330_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af6/8600932/644e2f10da8e/12962_2021_330_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af6/8600932/4842023797aa/12962_2021_330_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af6/8600932/644e2f10da8e/12962_2021_330_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2af6/8600932/4842023797aa/12962_2021_330_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The origin of cost-benefit analysis: a comparative view of France and the United States.成本效益分析的起源:法国与美国的比较视角
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Nov 18;19(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00330-3.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
A cost-benefit analysis using contingent valuation techniques: a feasibility study in spinal surgery.使用条件价值评估技术的成本效益分析:脊柱外科的可行性研究。
Value Health. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):575-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00282.x. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
5
Use of formal benefit/cost evaluations in health system decision making.在卫生系统决策中使用正式的效益/成本评估。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 May;10(5):329-35.
6
Economic Evaluation for Health Investments En Route to Universal Health Coverage: Cost-Benefit Analysis or Cost-Effectiveness Analysis?经济评估对实现全民健康覆盖的卫生投资:成本效益分析还是成本效果分析?
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.005. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial.一项基于初级保健的认知行为方案治疗腰痛的多中心随机对照试验。背部技能训练(BeST)试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14410.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Cost-benefit analysis as a tool for decision making in environmental projects. Application to a reduction of dioxin emissions in Tarragona Province, Spain.成本效益分析作为环境项目决策的工具。应用于西班牙塔拉戈纳省二恶英排放的减少。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2004;11(5):307-12. doi: 10.1007/BF02979644.
10
Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of drug therapy.药物治疗的成本效益分析和成本效果分析。
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Apr;42(4):791-802.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy research on role of traditional medicine in emergency health system construction based on the PMC index model: evidence from China.基于PMC指数模型的传统医学在应急卫生系统建设中的作用政策研究:来自中国的证据
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04743-4.
2
Assessing the Social and Environmental Impact of Healthcare Technologies: Towards an Extended Social Return on Investment.评估医疗技术的社会和环境影响:走向扩展的社会投资回报率。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;20(6):5224. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065224.

本文引用的文献

1
An agenda for STS: Porter on trust and quantification in science, politics and society. [Review of: Porter TM. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton University Press, 1995].科学技术与社会(STS)议程:波特论科学、政治和社会中的信任与量化。[评:波特·TM。《对数字的信任:科学与公共生活中对客观性的追求》。普林斯顿大学出版社,1995年]
Soc Stud Sci. 1999 Aug;29(4):629-37. doi: 10.1177/030631299029004007.